find the sum express your answer in simplest form 3a-9/b-2 + 5a-7/b-2

Based on the ratings system and the summarize() and mean() functions, the code chunk to add is summarize(mean(Rating)) and the mean rating is 3.185933.

To find the mean rating, the complete code should be trimmed_flavors_df %>% summarize(mean(Rating)).

This code would allow you to see the mean rating of your data by combining the summarize() and mean() functions such that you can display summary statistics.

Because of the "mean()" function, the statistic that will be displayed is the mean rating which in this case would be 3.185933.

Find out more on code chunks at https://brainly.com/question/28209816

#SPJ1

The expected net payoff E(m) is equal to m + 10.5 and the optimal value of m is 20.

To calculate the expected net payoff, we need to determine the probabilities of stopping at each value from 1 to 20 and calculate the corresponding payoff for each case.

Let's denote the expected net payoff as E(m), where m is the threshold value at which the gambler decides to stop.

(a) To calculate the expected net payoff E(m), we sum the probabilities of stopping at each value multiplied by the payoff for that value.

E(m) = (1/20) * m + (1/20) * (m + 1) + (1/20) * (m + 2) + ... + (1/20) * 20

Simplifying the equation:

E(m) = (1/20) * (m + (m + 1) + (m + 2) + ... + 20)

E(m) = (1/20) * (20 * m + (1 + 2 + ... + 20))

E(m) = (1/20) * (20 * m + (20 * (20 + 1)) / 2)

E(m) = (1/20) * (20 * m + 210)

E(m) = m + 10.5

Therefore, the expected net payoff E(m) is equal to m + 10.5.

(b) To find the optimal value of m, we need to maximize the expected net payoff E(m).

Since E(m) = m + 10.5, we can see that the expected net payoff is linearly increasing with m.

Therefore, the optimal value of m would be the maximum possible value, which is 20.

Hence, the optimal value of m is 20.

To learn more about expected net payoff visit:

brainly.com/question/30429228

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is 14/11

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean score for the first four matches is 44. The team will need to score 44 points in the next match to maintain the same mean score.

The given scores of the first four matches of a basketball team are 43, 55, 41 and 37 points.

We are supposed to find the mean of these scores in order to calculate the score that the team needs to maintain the same mean score.

Step 1: We can find the mean of the four scores by adding the four scores and then dividing by the number of scores.

Here we have four scores.

So we add them and then divide by 4:

Mean score = (43 + 55 + 41 + 37) / 4

= 176 / 4

= 44.

Hence, the mean of the first four scores is 44.

Step 2: To find out what score the team needs to maintain the same mean score, we will add the score in the next match and then divide by 5 (the new number of scores).

The mean score should remain at 44, so:

(43 + 55 + 41 + 37 + x) / 5

= 44

Here, we will find the value of x, which will be the score needed in the next match:

43 + 55 + 41 + 37 + x = 220 (multiplying both sides by 5)

⇒ 176 + x = 220 (adding both sides by -176)

⇒ x = 44

Therefore, the team will need to score 44 points in the next match to maintain the same mean score of 44.

So, the answer is:

The mean score for the first four matches is 44.

The team will need to score 44 points in the next match to maintain the same mean score.

To know more about mean score visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15931564

#SPJ11

Answer:

The value of x depends on the amount the length is going to run to.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and the strength and direction of the correlation cannot be determined without the specific values of the sum of products and the sums of squares of X and Y differences.

(a) To calculate Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), we need to calculate the following values:

Step 1: Calculate the mean (average) of the age (X) and attitudes towards the police (Y).

Mean of X (age): (19 + 26 + 21 + 39 + 20 + 44 + 50 + 28 + 57 + 31 + 42 + 28 + 22 + 65 + 70) / 15 = 36.13

Mean of Y (attitudes towards the police): (2 + 6 + 3 + 6 + 4 + 6 + 8 + 5 + 8 + 7 + 9 + 1 + 9 + 8) / 15 = 5.67

Step 2: Calculate the difference between each X value and the mean of X (age) (X - X_mean) and each Y value and the mean of Y (attitudes towards the police) (Y - Y_mean).

For example, for respondent A: (19 - 36.13) = -17.13 and (2 - 5.67) = -3.67

Step 3: Calculate the product of the differences obtained in Step 2 for each respondent.

For example, for respondent A: (-17.13) * (-3.67) = 62.7871

Step 4: Calculate the square of the differences obtained in Step 2 for each respondent.

For example, for respondent A: (-17.13)^2 = 293.7369 and (-3.67)^2 = 13.4689

Step 5: Sum up the products obtained in Step 3 and the squares obtained in Step 4.

Sum of products: 62.7871 + ... (sum of the products for all respondents)

Sum of squares of X differences: 293.7369 + ... (sum of the squares of X differences for all respondents)

Sum of squares of Y differences: 13.4689 + ... (sum of the squares of Y differences for all respondents)

Step 6: Calculate the correlation coefficient using the formula:

r = [Sum of products / sqrt(Sum of squares of X differences * Sum of squares of Y differences)]

(b) To determine the strength and direction of the correlation:

- The strength of the correlation is indicated by the magnitude of the correlation coefficient (r). If r is close to 1 or -1, it indicates a strong correlation, while values close to 0 indicate a weak correlation.

- The direction of the correlation is determined by the sign of the correlation coefficient. A positive r value indicates a positive correlation (as one variable increases, the other tends to increase), while a negative r value indicates a negative correlation (as one variable increases, the other tends to decrease).

Learn more about sum of products here:-

https://brainly.com/question/27973769

#SPJ11

Answer:

(2, 2) and (3, 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

as x increases by 1, y increases by 2. so, just add 2 to the last y value to get the answer.

Answer:

2         4

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in the x value give into the equation to get the y vaule so 2(2)-2=4-2=2

then 2(3)-3=6-2=4

Hope this helps! :)

True, Reinforcement Learning (RL) with linear function approximation may not work effectively on environments having a continuous state space.

The reason behind this is the complexity and high dimensionality of continuous state spaces, which often makes it difficult for a linear function to capture the underlying structure of the environment accurately.
Linear function approximation involves using a linear combination of features to estimate the value function or the optimal policy in RL. While this approach works well for discrete state spaces and simple problems, it struggles to handle continuous state spaces where the relationships between states and actions are more complex and nonlinear.
In such environments, a more sophisticated function approximation technique, such as neural networks or kernel-based methods, might be required to learn and generalize from continuous state spaces effectively. These methods can capture nonlinear relationships, enabling better performance in challenging environments.
In summary, although RL with linear function approximation can work in some cases, it might not be effective in environments with continuous state spaces due to the complexity and high dimensionality involved. More advanced function approximation techniques are typically necessary for successful learning in such situations.

To leran more about linear function, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/29205018

#SPJ11

Answer:

32h=d

Step-by-step explanation:

yea, this is big brain time lol

also edge lol

The solution to this problem is (s2+1)Y(s)−2s−1=2s2+4 .

We let  L[y(t)]=Y(s) . With that, tabular Laplace-transform laws entail

L[y′]=sY(s)−y(0)=sY(s)−2

L[y′′]=s2Y(s)−sy(0)−y′(0)=s2Y(s)−2s−1

∴L[y′′+y]=(s2+1)Y(s)−2s−1 .

Since the Laplace transform of  sin(kt)  is  ks2+k2 , we have

(s2+1)Y(s)−2s−1=2s2+4 .

This equation readily solves to  Y(s)=2s3+s2+8s+6(s2+1)(s2+4) . We compute its partial fraction decomposition as  Y(s)=2s+53s2+1+−23s2+4 .

Our final step is to use tabular Laplace-transform laws ( sin(kt)↦ks2+k2 , and  cos(kt)↦ss2+k2 ) to get  y(t)=2cost+53sint−13sin(2t) . One can check that this indeed satisfies the initial value problem.

For more information about laplace transform, visit

https://brainly.com/question/14701796

#SPJ4

Answer:

We have 4 ways of solving one-step equations: Adding, Substracting, multiplication and division. If we add the same number to both sides of an equation, both sides will remain equal. If we subtract the same number from both sides of an equation, both sides will remain equal.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of bears:beans: buttons in the simplest form is 7:3:2

Mathematicians use the term "ratio" to compare two or more numbers. It serves as a comparison tool to show how big or tiny an amount is in relation to another.

Weight of sweet bag = 120g

Cost of a sweet bag = 0.89 euros

Number of gummy bears = 14

Number of jelly beans = 6

Number of chocolate buttons = 4

The ratio of bears:beans:buttons = 14:6:4

Dividing the ratio by 2 throughout we get:

Ratio of bears:beans:buttons = 7:3:2

So, In its simplest form, the ratio of bears to beans to buttons is 7:3:2.

Learn more about ratios:

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ9

The total radius of a cone with a radius of 4in and a height of 12in is 8in.

The total radius of a cone is the sum of the radius of the base and the slant height of the cone. The slant height of a cone can be found using the Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the slant height is equal to the sum of the square of the height and the square of the radius of the base.

So, to find the total radius of the cone, we need to calculate the slant height and add it to the radius of the base.

Slant height = sqrt(radius² + height²)

= √(4² + 12²)

= √(160)

= 12.65in (rounded to two decimal places)

Total radius = radius + slant height

= 4in + 12.65in

= 16.65in

≈ 8in (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the total radius of the cone is approximately 8 inches.

Learn more about cone

https://brainly.com/question/30253224

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete! Complete question along with answer and step by step explanation is provided below.

Question:

Most individuals are aware of the fact that the average annual repair cost for an automobile depends on the age of the automobile. A researcher is interested in finding out whether the variance of the annual repair costs also increases with the age of the automobile. A sample of 26 automobiles 4 years old showed a sample standard deviation for annual repair costs of $120 and a sample of 23 automobiles 2 years old showed a sample standard deviation for annual repair costs of $100. Let 4 year old automobiles be represented by population 1.

State the null and alternative versions of the research hypothesis that the variance in annual repair costs is larger for the older automobiles.

At a 0.01 level of significance, what is your conclusion? What is the p-value?

Answer:

Null hypotheses = H₀ = σ₁² ≤ σ₂²

Alternative hypotheses = Ha = σ₁² > σ₂²

Test statistic = 1.44

p-value = 0.1954

0.1954 > 0.01

Since the p-value is greater than the given significance level therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

We can conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variance in annual repair costs is larger for older automobiles.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let σ₁² denotes the variance of 4 years old automobiles

Let σ₂² denotes the variance of 2 years old automobiles

State the null and alternative hypotheses:

The null hypothesis assumes that the variance in annual repair costs is smaller for older automobiles.

Null hypotheses = H₀ = σ₁² ≤ σ₂²

The alternate hypothesis assumes that the variance in annual repair costs is larger for older automobiles.

Alternative hypotheses = Ha = σ₁² > σ₂²

Test statistic:

The test statistic is given by

Test statistic = σ₁²/σ₂²

Test statistic = 120²/100²

Test statistic = 1.44

p-value:

The degree of freedom corresponding to 4 years old automobiles is given by

df₁ = n - 1  

df₁ = 26 - 1  

df₁ = 25

The degree of freedom corresponding to 2 years old automobiles is given by

df₂ = n - 1  

df₂ = 23 - 1  

df₂ = 22

Using Excel to find out the p-value,  

p-value = FDIST(F-value, df₁, df₂)

p-value = FDIST(1.44, 25, 22)

p-value = 0.1954

Conclusion:

When the p-value is less than the significance level then we reject the Null hypotheses

p-value < α   (reject H₀)

But for the given case,

p-value > α

0.1954 > 0.01

Since the p-value is greater than the given significance level therefore, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.

We can conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that the variance in annual repair costs is larger for older automobiles.

Answer: 3 7/12

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Solving the whole number

4-1=3

2. Solving the fraction parts

3/4 - 1/6=

Find the LCM. The LCM is 12 so we rewrite the factions like this:

9/12-2/12=7/12

3. Add.

3+ 7/12= 3 7/12

Hey there!

4 3/4 - 1 1/6

= 19/4 - 7/6

= (19 × 6) - (7 × 4) / 4 × 6

19 × 6 = 114

7 × 4 = 28

= 114 - 28 / 4 × 6

4 × 6 = 24

114 - 28 / 24

114 - 28 = 86

= 86/24

= 3 7/12

Answer: 86/24 OR 3 7/12

Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!

~Amphitrite1040:)

The number of days in which Meena would be able to complete the work alone is 24 days.

In order to determine the number of days in which Meena would be able to complete the work alone, we would have to assign variables to the amount of time taken by Mala, Meena, and Vinay, and then translate the word problem into an algebraic equation as follows;

Note: Combined work rate = 1/x + 1/y + 1/z

Based on the information provided, we have the following equations that models the work rate by each person;

1/(x + y) = 10 ⇒ 1/10 = x + y    ........equation 1.

1/(y + z) = 12 ⇒ 1/12 = y + z    ........equation 2.

1/(x + z) = 15 ⇒ 1/15 = x + z    ........equation 3.

x + y + y + z + x + z = 1/10 + 1/12 + 1/15

2(x + y + z) = 15/60

2(x + y + z) = 1/4

x + y + z = 1/8

From equation 2, we have:

x + (y + z) = 1/8

x + 1/12 = 1/8

x = 1/8 - 1/12

x = 1/24

x = 24 days.

Read more on work here: brainly.com/question/28622215

#SPJ1

Therefore, visually interpreting histograms can be a powerful tool for data analysis, but it is important to be aware of their strengths and limitations.

Histograms are an effective way to display data graphically. They are used to show how often certain values or ranges of values appear in a data set. Visual interpretation of histograms has many strengths and limitations. Some of the strengths of visually interpreting histograms are that they are easy to read and understand, they provide a clear picture of how the data is distributed, and they can help identify outliers or gaps in the data. However, some of the limitations of visually interpreting histograms are that they can be influenced by the number of bins chosen, the way the data is grouped, and the choice of the scale used. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider these factors when interpreting a histogram. In conclusion, visually interpreting histograms can be a powerful tool for data analysis, but it is important to be aware of their strengths and limitations.

Therefore, visually interpreting histograms can be a powerful tool for data analysis, but it is important to be aware of their strengths and limitations.

To know more about statement visit :

https://brainly.com/question/27839142

#SPJ11

1 standard deviation =  8 inches. the answer is OPTION E

We know that 99.7% of American men have heights between 5'0" and 7'0". Since height is normally distributed, we can use the empirical rule to estimate the standard deviation.

According to the empirical rule, 99.7% of the data falls within 3 standard deviations of the mean. Therefore, we can say that the range of heights from 5'0" to 7'0" is 3 standard deviations.

We can use this information to estimate the standard deviation as follows:

Range of heights = 7'0" - 5'0" = 2 feet

3 standard deviations = 2 feet

1 standard deviation = 2/3 feet

1 foot = 12 inches

Therefore, 1 standard deviation = 2/3 * 12 inches = 8 inches

So, our estimate of the standard deviation of the height of American men is 8 inches. Therefore, the answer is OPTION E in the given options.

To know more about standard deviation refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Complete question

If the heights of 99.7% of American men are between 5'0"

and 7'0", what is your estimate of the standard deviation of

the height of American men? (Assume the heights of

American Men are Normally Distributed).

A.) 1"

B.) 2"

C.) 4"

D.) 6"

E.) 8"

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

120 is the starting value, aka the price of the painting in 2014 before it is increased.

The correct answer is option C, when the distribution of the data is approximately symmetric and bell-shaped.

According to the Empirical Rule, also referred to as the 68-95-99.7 Rule, for a normal distribution, roughly 68% of the data will lie within one standard deviation of the mean, 95% of the data will lie within two standard deviations of the mean, and 99.7% of the data will lie within three standard deviations of the mean.

Only when the distribution of the data is symmetric and bell-shaped does this rule hold.

The Empirical Rule cannot be used to estimate percentages if the data is skewed to the left or right.

The Empirical Rule can be used to predict the population from which the data were taken, making it a useful tool when examining data with a normal distribution.

It's crucial to remember that this rule is merely an estimation and may not be correct depending on whether the data follows a normal distribution.

Complete Question:

The empirical rule can be used to estimate some specific percentages _______.

Select one:

A. when the distribution of the data is skewed to the right.

B . when the distribution of the data is skewed to the left.

C. when the distribution of the data is approximately symmetric and bell-shaped.

D. when the distribution of the data has any shape.

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27820465

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) = b im doing  the test.

2)=The correct option is C) A coordinate plane is shown with a line crossing through the y axis at negative 3 and the x axis at 2.

3) its a

4)b

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

5/2.5 = x/4

Cross Multiply

2.5x=20

Divide

8

A(x,y) becomes A'(y,-x):

So:

x(-5, 8) ------------>x'(8,5)

For a 90 Degree Rotation counter clockwise:

A(x,y) becomes A' (-y,x)

Therefore:

A(1,5)----------->A'(-5,1)

B(3,6)----------->B'(-6,3)

C(5,2)------------>C'(-2,5)

D(3,1)------------->D'(-1,3)

The Number of terms in the expression 8 - 4c is 2.

An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two or more numbers and variables.

Terms are added or subtracted to make a polynomial. They're composed of variables and constants all in multiplication.

We are given an expression as;

8 - 4c

Here c is the variable.

The first one is 8 and the second one is 4c

Therefore, number of terms are 2

Learn more about equations here;

https://brainly.com/question/25180086

#SPJ1

We can draw the trapezoid as follows

Recall that the area of a trapezoid of the shape

Is given by the formula

In our case, we have b=1/5, B = 2/7 and the area is 17/420. So we have the following equation

so we need to solve this equation for h.

We start by solving this operation

Recall that given two fractions a/b and c/d we have

Taking a=2, b=7, c=1 and d=5, we get

So we have the equation

Now, recall that givens numbers a,b,c where b and c are not zero, we have that

In our case, lets take a=17, b=35 and c=2. So we have

So we have the equation

We can divide both sides by 17, so we get

So if we multiply both sides by 70, we get

So the height of the trapezoid is h=1/6 cm.

the percent error in Clara's estimate is approximately 8.0%, which means her estimate differs from the actual length by 8.0%.

Clara estimated the length of a hiking trail to be 5.75 kilometers, but the actual length is 6.25 kilometers. We need to calculate the percent error in Clara's estimate, rounding to the nearest tenth of a percent.

The percent error can be calculated using the formula: (|Estimated Value - Actual Value| / Actual Value) × 100%.

In this case, Clara's estimated value is 5.75 kilometers and the actual value is 6.25 kilometers.

Applying the formula, we have: (|5.75 - 6.25| / 6.25) × 100% = (0.5 / 6.25) × 100% ≈ 0.08 × 100% ≈ 8.0%.

Therefore, the percent error in Clara's estimate is approximately 8.0%, which means her estimate differs from the actual length by 8.0%.

To learn more about percent error, click here:

brainly.com/question/30545034

#SPJ11

The market research survey conducted by Professor Leung indicates an unfavorable market based on the determined results, even though the expected monetary value (EMV) is given as 67740.

The given information states that the EMV (Expected Monetary Value) is $67,740. Additionally, it is mentioned that the market research survey will produce unfavorable results.

The EMV represents the expected monetary value, which is a measure of the potential financial outcome associated with a decision or event. In this case, the EMV of $67,740 suggests the potential financial value or benefit that Humber could gain from conducting the market research survey.

However, the statement also indicates that the results of the survey will be unfavorable. This implies that the market conditions or outcomes indicated by the survey will not be beneficial for Humber. The specific details about the nature of the unfavorable market conditions or the potential impact on Humber's decision-making are not provided, but it suggests that the survey results may not lead to desirable outcomes for the company.

To learn more about Monetary Value - brainly.com/question/13164540

#SPJ11