The legal description method that uses compass headings and directions is called the "metes and bounds" method.
This method is commonly used to describe and define the boundaries of a piece of land or property. It relies on a combination of linear measurements (metes) and directional instructions (bounds) to outline the shape and size of the property.
In the metes and bounds method, a starting point (point of beginning) is established, typically described by a monument or a reference point. From there, the surveyor or property owner follows a series of lines, using compass headings (such as north, south, east, and west) and distances to delineate the boundaries of the property. Additionally, specific landmarks or natural features may be referenced, such as rivers, trees, or roads, to further define the boundaries.
This method has been used for centuries and is still employed in many regions, particularly in areas with irregular or non-rectangular property shapes. It requires a skilled surveyor or land professional to accurately interpret and follow the metes and bounds descriptions to identify and locate the boundaries of the property.
To know more about "metes and bounds" method. , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23857679
#SPJ11
The legal description method that uses compass headings and directions is the metes and bounds method.
Explanation:Legal descriptions
in real estate primarily use two methods: the
metes and bounds
method and the
rectangular survey system
. The metes and bounds method uses
compass headings and directions
to describe the boundaries of a property. For example, it may state that the boundary starts at a specific point and then runs north for a certain distance, then turns and runs east for another distance. The rectangular survey system, on the other hand, uses a grid of
township, range, and section numbers
to describe the location and boundaries of a property.
Learn more about Legal Descriptions here:https://brainly.com/question/36608452
What is the first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples like
me?
The first policy that impacts Indigenous peoples is the Doctrine of Discovery.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the first policy that impacted Indigenous peoples. The Doctrine of Discovery, which emerged in the fifteenth century, provided a legal foundation for European claims to land in the Americas, Africa, and Australia. Indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and self-determination were disregarded by this colonial system, which was based on the belief that Indigenous peoples were subhuman and incapable of governing themselves. As a result, Indigenous peoples were frequently exploited, enslaved, and subjected to cultural genocide.
To know more about genocide visit:
brainly.com/question/32013150
#SPJ11
Which of the following are situations in which sexual abuse should be reported to law enforcement?
Answer: Any case where the crime is believed to have occurred
Explanation:
you didn't include the options but sexual abuse is a crime therefore it should always be reported.
Subraya la opción cuya serie de palabras tiene el mismo significado. A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Answer:
A) viejo, remoto, antiguo, arcaico, añejo
b) aumentar, incrementar, disminuir, crecer, ampliar
c) defender, atacar, proteger, cuidar, resguardar
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
Are police officers allowed too much discretion? Why is discretion a necessary element of policing?Or is it?
PRIMARY PREVENTION IN SCHOOLS
You're charged with devising a school-based intervention
For students who are at risk of deviance based on a
biological trait theory.
• How would you identify a student as "at-risk"?
• What aspects of the school environment might trigger crime?
. Based on this information, how might you design a school-based
intervention to reduce deviance in this specific at-risk population?
Biological - genetic, evolutionary, neurophysiological, biochemical
a
Answer:
I would suggest the following steps for devising a school-based intervention for at-risk students based on biological trait theory:
1. Identification of at-risk students: To identify at-risk students, the school authorities can use various screening tools such as behavioral checklists, teacher ratings, psychometric assessments, and medical histories. Students having a family history of criminal behavior, ADHD or impulsivity issues, or any other genetic or neurophysiological predisposition towards deviant behavior can be considered at-risk.
2. Assessment of triggers in the school environment: The school environment can have significant influences on a student's behavior. Identifying triggers such as peer pressure, bullying, academic pressure, and inadequate social support can help to develop effective intervention strategies to mitigate these triggers.
3. Designing a school-based intervention: Based on the identification of at-risk students and assessment of triggers, a school-based intervention can be devised to reduce deviant behavior in this specific at-risk population. Some potential strategies could include:
- Increased teacher and peer support: Providing additional support and mentoring to at-risk students can help to alleviate academic pressure and bullying. Positive peer relationships can help to boost self-esteem and decrease the risk of deviant behavior.
- Character education programs: Character education programs can promote a positive school culture that emphasizes respect, responsibility, and empathy. By teaching students essential life skills, social, and emotional competence can foster healthy behaviors and positive decision-making.
- Skill-building workshops: Offering workshops on problem-solving, conflict resolution, goal setting, and anger management can help students develop essential life skills to manage their behavior and lead productive lives.
In summary, a school-based intervention plan designed to address the biological trait theory of deviant behavior can be an effective strategy to reduce the risk of such situations in at-risk students. However, it is crucial to identify the specific needs of each student and tailor interventions to their specific requirements.
Are the courts more trustworthy than elected officials ?
What law prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business?
The law that prohibits the giving or accepting of payment for referrals of federally funded business is the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS).
The AKS is a federal law that makes it a criminal offense to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or receive any remuneration to induce or reward referrals of items or services reimbursable by a federal health care program, such as Medicare or Medicaid.
The purpose of the AKS is to prevent fraud and abuse in federal health care programs by ensuring that referrals are based on the best interests of patients and not on financial incentives. The AKS applies to a wide range of healthcare providers, suppliers, and vendors who do business with the federal government.
To learn more about business here
https://brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
if a neighbor accidentally backed his car into the fence that divides your property, destroying a large section of it, and you sued your neighbor in court for damages, you would be the:
If a neighbor accidentally backed his car into the fence that divides your property, destroying a large section of it, and you sued your neighbor in court for damages, you would be the: "Plaintiff"
Who is a Plaintiff?
Plaintiff is the party who brings a legal action or in whose name it is brought as opposed to the defendant, the party who is being sued. Plaintiff and defendant are terms usually used in civil cases and/or a civil lawsuit. These can be anything from personal injury claims to negligence, to breach of contract, and family law cases.
Therefore, if a neighbor accidentally backed his car into the fence that divides your property, destroying a large section of it, and you sued your neighbor in court for damages, you would be the: "Plaintiff"
To know more about a Plaintiff, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Which court would be the first to determine the constitutionality of a local law?
The first court that would determine the constitutionality of a local law is the trial court. The trial court is the court that first hears and rules on a lawsuit. It's also known as a district court, superior court, or circuit court, depending on the state.
The trial court's primary responsibility is to determine the facts and apply the law to those facts in order to reach a judgment or decision. When a local law is challenged as unconstitutional, the first court to determine its constitutionality is the trial court. The trial court will hear arguments from both sides and make a ruling on whether or not the law is constitutional. If either side disagrees with the trial court's decision, they may appeal the decision to a higher court. The appellate court will then review the trial court's decision and determine whether it was made in accordance with the law. If the appellate court disagrees with the trial court's decision, it may reverse or modify the decision. If the appellate court upholds the trial court's decision, the ruling becomes final and binding.
In conclusion, the trial court is the first court that would determine the constitutionality of a local law.
For more such questions on trial court
https://brainly.com/question/30259708
#SPJ11
For this assignment, you will describe and compare the powers and responsibilities of each branch of the federal government. To do this, you will complete the following steps:
Reflect: Identify the institutions, powers, and responsibilities of each branch of the federal government.
Analyze: Answer questions about the roles each branch plays in carrying out the powers of government.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.
Based on what you've learned about the three branches of the federal government, answer the following questions. If you need help remembering the details about each branch, go back through the contents of this unit. This section is worth 9 points.
1. List the responsibilities and powers of each branch of the federal government. (6 points)
Branch of government
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Responsibilities
Powers (identify at least two powers for each branch)
2. Describe at least one way in which the executive branch is able to influence the actions of the legislative branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the judicial branch. (1 point)
3. Describe at least one way in which the legislative branch is able to influence the actions of the judicial branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the executive branch. (1 point)
4. Describe at least one way in which the judicial branch is able to influence the actions of the legislative branch and at least one way in which it is able to influence the actions of the executive branch. (1 point)
Now that you have reflected on the powers and responsibilities of each branch, answer the following questions. This section is worth 11 points.
1. The federal government creates the laws that govern the entire nation. Compare the role each branch of government plays in this process and explain which branch plays the most important role in creating laws. (3 points)
2. The federal government is responsible for enforcing laws and carrying out policies. Compare the role each branch of government plays in this process and explain which branch plays the most important role in enforcing laws and carrying out policies. (3 points)
3. The federal government was established by the U.S. Constitution, which created a system of check and balances. Compare the ways each branch balances out the other branches' powers and explain how the judicial branch plays a critical role in maintaining the system of checks and balances. (3 points)
4. Based on what you have learned, which branch of government do you believe has the most power overall? Support your opinion with examples. (2 points)
A legislature is a deliberative assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entity such as a country or city. Legislatures form important parts of most governments; in the separation of powers model, they are often contrasted with the executive and judicial branches of parliamentary government.
Laws enacted by legislatures are usually known as primary legislation. In addition, legislatures may observe and steer governing actions, with authority to amend the budget involved.
The members of a legislature are called legislators. In a democracy, legislators are most commonly popularly elected, although indirect election and appointment by the executive are also used, particularly for bicameral legislatures featuring an upper chamber.
The executive is the branch of government exercising authority in and holding responsibility for the governance of a state. The executive executes and enforces law.
In political systems based on the principle of separation of powers, authority is distributed among several branches —an attempt to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a single group of people. In such a system, the executive does not pass laws or interpret them . Instead, the executive enforces the law as written by the legislature and interpreted by the judiciary. The executive can be the source of certain types of law, such as a decree or executive order
The judiciary is the system of courts that interprets, defends, and applies the law in the name of the state. The judiciary can also be thought of as the mechanism for the resolution of disputes. Under the doctrine of the separation of powers, the judiciary generally does not make statutory law or enforce law, but rather interprets, defends, and applies the law to the facts of each case. However, in some countries the judiciary does make common law.
In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation, the provisions of the constitution, treaties or international law. Judges constitute a critical force for interpretation and implementation of a constitution, thus in common law countries creating the body of constitutional law.
A legislative body is responsible for the ongoing power to enact laws for a political unit, such as a nation or city. Usually referred to as primary legislation, laws passed by legislatures.
What is The legislative branch?The legislative branch can approve presidential appointments, manage the budget, impeach the president, and force him or her to resign from office by using their power and authority.
The ability to veto laws that the legislative branch adopts belongs to the executive branch and the president. The judicial branch has the power to invalidate legislation that the legislative branch has passed.
When state laws and regulations are found to be incompatible with a higher standard, such as primary legislation, courts having judicial review authority may revoke those laws and regulations.
Learn more about the legislative branch, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8338696
#SPJ3
Why is evidence of a habit considered admissible in many cases? Because it shows that a person has a pattern of truthfulness or untruthfulness. Because it shows that someone is not likely to be the type of person to engage in a specific activity. Because it shows that someone is likely to have been in a specific place at a certain time. Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Answer:
Because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
Explanation:
Evidence of a habit is considered admissible in many cases in court because it shows that a regular pattern of behavior results in evidence that is easy to prove.
This is because, the habit of a person is used to prove that the conduct of such person during a given occasion is consistent with his/her habits.
can you anonymously report someone to immigration online?
The answer is Yes, you can anonymously report someone to immigration online. We take all reports of suspicious activity seriously and you can choose to remain anonymous.
Reporting online includes following online steps:
Discover and gather as much information as you can regarding your reports.Then stablish private internet connection to connect with.Then go to ICE website (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)Fill and complete the Homeland security investigation (HSI) tip form.And lastly submit your tip and make a digital copy of your report for your own records.Note: Don't provide wrong or false information to harass someone for your own wrong intentions.
To know more about ICE website:
brainly.com/question/29847417
#SPJ4
Question 6 of 10
What is one major problem created by globalization?
Answer:
Since developing countries like China and India can offer same products at cheaper rates, developed countries like the US are also bound to reduce their prices to stay in the competition.
Explanation:
hope this helped lol
consider the following passages that seem to describe aspects of the magna carta. more than one of these passages is accurate. however, at least one is not accurate. select all the passages that are true. group of answer choices this document is credited with establishing the principle that the english government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law, which is the essential idea upon which the united states constitution is based. the magna carta is the original source of the bedrock idea in the united states constitution that all people owe a debt of public service in exchange for their freedom; in fact, the united states constitution directly borrowed the privileges and freedoms clause from the famous twelfth paragraph in the magna carta. english king john reluctantly agreed to sign and place his seal on the great charter at runnymeade, england in 1215 in order to essentially make peace between himself and a group of disaffected english noblemen and barons. it was the great survey of much of england, completed in 1086 by order of the english king william i, the document marked a revolutionary step forward in recording public records, which allowed for improved government administration.
In order to essentially make peace with a group of disgruntled English noblemen and barons, English King John grudgingly consented to sign and put his mark on the Great Charter in 1215 at Runnymeade, England.
The fundamental premise on which the United States Constitution is based that the English government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law was established by this text. The United Kingdom includes the nation of England. With Wales to the west and Scotland to the north, it has shared land borders. Northwest and southwest, respectively, are the Irish Sea and the Celtic Sea. The English Channel to the south and the North Sea to the east divide it from mainland Europe. Over 100 smaller islands, including the Isles of Scilly and the Isle of Wight, are part of the country, which takes up five-eighths of the North Atlantic island of Great Britain.
Learn more about England here
https://brainly.com/question/21221749
#SPJ4
the process of petitioning a legislature to introduce a bill. It was part of the Populist Party's platform in 1891, along with referendum and recall. These all intended to make the people more responsible for their laws and allow them to make political decisions rather than the legislature.
Answer:
initiative
Explanation:
Michael is a Fijian citizen. He left Fiji in 2021 to work as a chef on super yachts based in European ports. He is employed by a company based in and resident of France. His salary is paid into Fijian bank account.
The yachts cruise the world and on occasions they come into Fijian waters. He is a single man and does not own a residence overseas but spends approximately three months of the year in France when the yachts require maintenance. Michael returns to Fiji twice yearly to visit family, friends and for holidays. He does not own his own home in Fiji and stays with his parents on visits.
Required:
Discuss whether Michael is a Fijian resident for tax purposes.
Michael is not a Fijian resident for tax purposes, though the length of his stay in Fiji is not stated.
What is a resident taxpayer in Fiji?A resident taxpayer in Fiji is a person who earns income and is present in Fiji for a period of 183 or more days in a 12-month period.
Michael spends his time on French yachts that cruise the world and Michael occasionally visits Fiji. Michael also spends three months in France. We are not sure he spends up to three months in Fiji
Since the company that employs Michael is a resident of France, Michael is not a Fijian resident.
Thus, Michael is technically a resident in France, and for tax purposes, his earnings should be subject to France taxation, not Fiji's.
Learn more about international tax residency at https://brainly.com/question/14994967
#SPJ1
Which of the following BEST describes the “rule of four”?
A.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.
B.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.
C.
It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision on the Court.
D.
The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case
Answer:
i think its B
Explanation:
You are an off-duty officer who has just completed a three-mile run. You decide to cool off and rest under a big oak tree. You sit down under the tree and see a brown wallet close by. Curiosity gets the best of you, and you open the waller. Interestingly enough, you find credit cards, identification, and $300 in cash. Nobody else is around. What would you do?
If I make a report in good faith and dad determines I am wrong, I can be held liable.
Liability may arise if a report made in good faith leads to harm or if negligence in information gathering is proven.
If an individual makes a report in good faith, meaning they genuinely believe the information they are providing is accurate and reliable, but their dad determines that they are wrong, there are certain circumstances in which they can be held liable. One such circumstance is if the report leads to tangible harm or negative consequences for others based on the erroneous information. If the report causes financial loss, reputational damage, or any form of harm to individuals or entities, the person who made the report may be held responsible for the resulting damages.Additionally, liability may arise if it can be proven that the individual was negligent in gathering or verifying the information before making the report. While good faith provides some level of protection, it does not absolve individuals of the responsibility to exercise reasonable care and diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the information they are reporting.It is important to note that liability in such cases would generally be determined through legal processes and would depend on the specific laws and regulations applicable in the relevant jurisdiction.The complete question should be In what circumstances can an individual be held liable if they make a report in good faith, but their dad determines that they are wrong?
For more questions on Liability
https://brainly.com/question/14921529
#SPJ8
We are going to cancel the regional sales meeting …………. the big snowstorm has shut down airports and all major airlines are grounded.
A. although
B. despite
C. unless
D. since
The word that best completes the underlined word from the given sentence is:
D. SinceFrom the given question, we can see that an action is about to be taken, but there is a problem that cannot allow them to proceed. This problem is a bug snowstorm which has stopped all vehicular and air travel.
As a result of this, we need to use a word that highlights this problem and shows the reason why the regional sales meeting cannot proceed as planned.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D because the transitional word "Since" is used to show why the meeting could not take place.
Read more here:
https://brainly.com/question/12644119
Does the state pay tor the cost of an individuak that has probation
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!
Which of the following factors can complicate analysis of post-mortem cooling
the victim's size
the victim's nationality
whether the victim is found face up or down
whether the victim had a heavy or light meal tast
Answer:
I think it would be the first one
Explanation:
If that doesn't work and you have another attempt then try the last one because I can't be to certain
The following factor can complicate analysis of post-mortem cooling is whether the victim is found face up or down. Thus option (c) is correct.
What is Post mortem cooling?
Algor mortis, the cooling of the body postmortem, is the result of a cessation in thermoregulation. As body temperature is controlled by the hypothalamus, this homeostatic feature can no longer be maintained after death.
Post mortem cooling of the body is one of the pertinent parameters in estimation of time since death during the early postmortem period.
Purpose of this is to analyze some of the existing methods, compare obtained results and determine which method gives more precise results of the estimation of time since death.
Learn more about postmortem cooling here:
https://brainly.com/question/2112396
#SPJ2
Postmortem changes refer to various processes that occur in a body after death producing a variety of effects. These changes can be divided into early and late time periods, the latter represented by decomposition, however the entire process represents a continuum.
What are the two due processes of law within the Constitution?
Answer:
Due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments can be broken down into two categories: procedural due process and substantive due process. Procedural due process, based on principles of fundamental fairness, addresses which legal procedures are required to be followed in state proceedings.
Question 5 (1 point)
Salutary neglect is the British government's policy of deliberately being lax on their enforcement of parliamentary laws on the colonies to
promote colonial prosperity
O True
O False
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Yes, that is a common interpretation of the term "salutary neglect." Salutary neglect refers to a British policy of loosely enforcing the laws and regulations governing the American colonies in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. This policy was partly driven by a desire to promote economic prosperity in the colonies, as the British government believed that a thriving colonial economy would ultimately benefit the British Empire as a whole.
Under salutary neglect, the British government generally allowed the colonies to govern themselves and make their own economic decisions, without interference from British authorities. This led to a period of relative autonomy and prosperity for the American colonies, but it also contributed to a sense of independence and self-reliance among the colonists.
However, it's worth noting that the policy of salutary neglect was not always consistent or deliberate. It was partly a result of the British government's preoccupation with other matters, such as conflicts with France and Spain. Additionally, some British officials did attempt to enforce certain laws and regulations in the colonies, which led to tensions between the colonists and British authorities.
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
Which department or organization would you approach if your human rights have been violated?
Answer:
A Human Rights commission
Explanation:
Human rights commissions are commissions set up by the FCC or International Criminal Court. The ICC will make sure the boards are independent and non partisan. You should approach the ICC to appoint a Human Rights commission to you. You can also file a civil case with your local court.
Heyyo,
Answer:
The human rights commission.
Explanation:
The human rights commission is the organisation or department to approach if the human rights had been violated.
A human rights commission, also known as a human relations commission, is a body set up to investigate, promote or protect human rights.
Hope it helps :)
Have a great day!!
Explain Section 21. Patentable Inventions
Answer:
Patentable Inventions. — Any technical solution of a problem in any field of human activity which is new, involves an inventive step and is industrially applicable shall be Patentable. It may be, or may relate to, a product, or process, or an improvement of any of the foregoing. (Section 21).
Explanation:
notice of intent to file a complaint for summary ejectment
Notice of content to File Complaint for Summary Ejection.
What is notice of content?
This notice serves as formal notification that we intend to file a complaint for summary ejectment against you for non-payment of rent and/or violation of lease terms.
You have failed to pay rent for the property located at [address] on [date] and have continued to occupy the property without consent.
You have also violated the terms of the lease agreement by [insert specific violation(s)].
We demand that you vacate the property immediately and failure to do so will result in legal action being taken against you.
Please contact us within [insert number of days] days to discuss a resolution or to vacate the property.
If you do not vacate the property or contact us within the specified time frame, we will file a complaint for summary ejectment in court and seek legal action to remove you from the property.
To learn more about lease agreement refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29237426
#SPJ4
The Safety Responsibility Law was designed to remove irresponsible drivers from Georgia highways and to protect insured motorists from uninsured motorists. True are false
Answer: True
Explanation:
This law, enacted in 1945, aims to exclude irresponsible drivers from driving and to protect insured drivers from the uninsured ones. To do so, the law states that those who fail to satisfy a claim for damages caused by a motor vehicle crash must have their driving license suspended for one year. The main goal of the law is to avoid having people suffering injuries in crashes caused by uninsured motorists, and it ends up encouraging motorists to purchase liability insurance.
Jessica and Emma are full-time employees at the Benjamin Limited Liability Company. They went to a coffee house named New Heaven Café near their office in the lunch time. Jessica ordered one coffee for her and a bottle of beer for her friend. Emma drank about half of the bottle, which was made of dark glass and labelled with white bold words.
When Emma poured the remainder of the beer into a tumbler, she found a stranger. At this point, the decomposed remains of a snail floated out. She was shocked and suffered a severe painful stomach. She had to spend a week in hospital. The doctor confirmed that her stomach problems might have been caused by the inferior quality beer.
The Western Beverages company which manufactured and supplied beer to New Heaven Café confirmed that their manufacturing process was controlled strictly, which had never caused any incidents like that.
Emma’s boss was very angry when she had a week leave in busy days at work. She explained that she had an urgent health problem. However, the boss was insistent with his intention; she was fired on the first day she was back to work. Emma is so upset and needs some legal advice.
Requirements:
Emma has approached you for some legal advice. Write a report outlining the following:
Explain the above legal issues with reference to the English legal system, decided and recorded case law.
The assignment will be assessed by reference to the following criteria:
1. Emma confuses as to whether there is a contract between her and the beer
manufacturer. Explain the essential elements of contract.
2. Advise Emma whether she may successfully sue the Western Beverages company
for negligence. Explain the essential elements to claim for negligence.
3. Advise Emma of her legal position with regards to Benjamin Limited Liability
Company. Explain the different types of dismissal.
Contract refers to an agreement between two or more party to carry out a duty in return for consideration
1. Yes, there is a contract between him and the beer company because he paid a sum for the beer and the company is responsible for producing good and healthy beer.
2. Yes, Emma can sue the company because she has suffered damage from use of the beer. She suffered health-wise and loss her job because of health issue arising from use of the beer.
3. Since the dismissal is done harshly, he can seek for resolution with the management to retain him back.
Read more about Contract element
brainly.com/question/8116487