Answers
The meaning of the phrase, " the law behind the law, " is that there are underlying values that apply when enforcing a law.
The " the law behind the law, " is important because it contributes to the proper application of the law.
What is the " the law behind the law "?The phrase "the law behind the law" refers to the underlying principles or values that guide the interpretation and application of a particular law. These principles or values may not be explicitly stated in the law itself, but they provide a framework for understanding the purpose and intent of the law.
The law behind the law is important because it helps to ensure that the law is applied consistently and fairly, and that it serves the intended purpose of promoting justice and fairness. It also helps to ensure that the law is interpreted in a way that is consistent with the values and principles of the society that it serves.
Find out more on the law at https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Think of the ways that Nationalist sentiment has an effect on life in contemporary America. Please look beyond the easy "Trumpism" stereotypes, and instead discuss what self-proclaimed nationalists believed before he ever came along. Why is this ideology so appealing to so many people?
Answers
Answer:
nationalism is the concept of pride for your country, nationalists believe in the America first idea, and that nothing could ever top the individual liberties, policies, and freedoms of America
Name and explain the purpose of one law/legislation that protects citizens
against the specific human right violation you have chosen.
Answers
Answer:
Domestic Violence Act and Criminal Law Act
Explanation: the Domestic Violence Act No 116 of 1998 and Criminal Law Act No 32 of 2007. Both are framed to protect women against any form of violence in South Africa
d.
injunction.
conversion.
20. Under specific circumstances some individuals are immune from liability
for defamation of character, even if the statements were made with
malice. Which individual or circumstance is not immune from liability?
a. lawyer during a trial.
b.
d.
legislator during a political campaign.
witnesses during a court hearing.
legislator during legislative meetings.
Answers
The individual or circumstance that is not immune from liability for defamation of character is a. lawyer during a trial.
How are lawyers not immune ?Lawyers have a duty to zealously advocate for their clients, but they are also bound by professional ethics and rules of conduct. If a lawyer makes defamatory statements about an opposing party during a trial, they may be subject to liability for defamation, regardless of the circumstances.
Additionally, lawyers can be subject to disciplinary action by the state bar if they violate ethical rules, including rules against making false or defamatory statements.
Find out more on defamation of character at https://brainly.com/question/20948017
#SPJ1
11. Write a short story of a fictitious crime and describe how soil evidence
helped link a suspect to the crime scene or victim.
12. Describe physical characteristics of soil that could heln distinguish
Answers
Answer:
Here is the short story:
The blood spilled on the floor and led to the greasy and spilled oil can on the other side of the garage. Mr. Link was just murdered, the knife was gone, however. I questioned 3 suspects. Mark said he was making some noodles for lunch, and didn't hear anything over the loud music. Scarlett said she was listening to stray kid's new hit, "oddinary". Melanie said she was playing with Mr. Link's son, Randy, and she heard a scream. She thought it might be Scarlett's music. "What were you doing," Mark asked. "I was at work and came out to find this. I looked at Mark. "Show me the kitchen." The kitchen was clean, and the noodles were ready and hot. "When were you making this?" I asked. "Oh, around 11:00." I looked at the time. It was 2:00. I dialed 911. "Say hi to jail," I said.
Explanation:
The evidence was the time. It was 11:00 when he made it, and 2:00 when he was done, and his noodles were still hot, which means that he must've lied about the time in order to trip him off. The scream was Mr. Link, and the music drained it all out for Scarlett.
a sexual assault victims restricted/unrestricted report will be maintained for reference for what minmum number of years
Answers
It is significant to note that, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific agency in charge of keeping the reports, different jurisdictions may have different retention rules for sexual assault reports. However, generally speaking, reports of sexual assault are kept on file for a long time—often for many years.
For instance, the Department of Defense (DOD) in the US has specific policies regarding the storage of reports of sexual assault, both restricted and unrestricted reports. DoD guidelines state that reports of sexual assault that are restricted must be kept for at least 50 years, while reports that are unrestricted must be kept for at least 75 years.It is also important to keep in mind that reports of sexual assault may occasionally be kept forever, particularly if they are related to an active criminal investigation or if the victim requests that they be kept for a longer time.In order to maximise their chances of obtaining support and justice, sexual assault victims should be aware of the retention procedures in place at the organisation in charge of keeping their report. Furthermore, it is crucial that agencies keep accurate and thorough records of all reported sexual assaults because doing so can help victims get the support they need and help hold offenders accountable.Because of this, reports of sexual assault are typically kept on file for a long time—often for many years.
Learn more about sexual assault victim here: https://brainly.com/question/1970589
#SPJ4
The tendency to desire and seek out positive outcomes and avoid negative ones would best be considered a(n)
Answers
Answer:
⠀Positive one.
FOLLOW ME
MARK BRAINLIEST
According to "social disorganization theory," disorganized communities contribute to criminal behavior. "Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens. Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes? What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"? Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The belief associated with social disorganization theory is that crimes often arise from society with destructive ecological conditions. Crime in itself is measured differently among societies. So crime rates are often linked and associated with some neighborhood because of their ecological characteristics. Weak housing, language barrier, unemployment, and other factors could affect the crime rate in certain societies depending on the law of that society.
"Labeling theory" argues that society labels those who do not fit the roles of law-abiding citizens because society sets up an acceptable behavior that is used as laid down rules for acceptable behavior. Deviance is any behavior that is good or bad depending on how it is socially constructed and considered as acceptable behaviors.
Now, to the set of questions above:
Do you think that society labels people from disorganized communities regardless of their involvement in crimes?
ANS:
Yes. Society views location as instrumental in influencing people's behavior. Since for instance, criminal behaviors are mostly learned behaviors, people from disorganized communities are generally considered capable of getting involved in illegal activities.
What problems could arise if society labels law-abiding citizens who belong to disorganized communities as "criminals"?
ANS:
1. Sometimes, the label given to someone could increase their tendencies for making mistakes.
2. It could impact their self-esteem.
3. It could make them start getting involved in crime.
4. It could affect their employment eligibility if they desire to seek employment out of their neighborhood.
5. It could affect how their peers see them and relate to them.
Would such citizens receive fair treatment and equal opportunities?
ANS:
NO. Since it is perceived that people of the same age group, language and other factors may share similar characteristics because they are in the same society, that would generally affect and limit opportunities and limit their fair treatment in the society.
What’s an event that involves matter and energy
Answers
what was the supreme court’s main decision in palko v. connecticut? palka was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy. palka’s sentence should be reversed. palka could not be convicted because of his fifth amendment rights. palka’s conviction and execution should be upheld.
Answers
In the case of Palko v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court's main decision was that Palko's conviction and execution should be upheld. The correct option is D.
The principal conclusion reached by the Supreme Court in Palko v. Connecticut was that Palko's conviction and execution should stand. The Fifth Amendment's ban on a person being tried twice for the same crime is at issue in this case, which deals with double jeopardy protection. The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment was not applicable to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court concluded. As a result, Palko's conviction and execution were ruled appropriate under the given situation.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Palko v. Connecticut here:
https://brainly.com/question/14000842
#SPJ4
is a type of classification that is nonpunitive in nature but requires the separation of inmates from the general population due to the threat that they may pose to themselves, staff, other inmates, or institutional order.2
Answers
Administrative Segregation is a type of classification that is nonpunitive in nature but requires the separation of inmates from the general population due to the threat that they may pose to themselves, staff, other inmates, or institutional order.
It is also referred to as "ad seg" or "solitary confinement". It is a form of confinement in which an inmate is held in a cell for 23 hours a day with limited human interaction, exercise, and access to educational and recreational programs.
Administrative segregation is used in correctional facilities as a management tool to address specific concerns related to the safety and security of the institution.
Inmates may be placed in administrative segregation if they pose a threat to themselves or others, if they have a history of violence or disruptive behavior, or if they are believed to be involved in gang activity.
In some cases, inmates may also be placed in administrative segregation for their own protection.
It is important to note that administrative segregation is intended to be a temporary measure, and inmates should be returned to the general population as soon as the threat they posed has been addressed.
Additionally, prolonged isolation can have negative psychological effects, including anxiety, depression, which is why correctional staff must be vigilant in monitoring the mental health of inmates in administrative segregation.
In conclusion, administrative segregation is a type of classification used in correctional facilities to address safety and security concerns. While it is nonpunitive in nature, it can have negative psychological effects on inmates and should be used sparingly and only as a last resort.
For more question on "Administrative Segregation" :
https://brainly.com/question/29807797
#SPJ11
a legal way that designates someone else to make healthcare decisions when he/she is unable to do so
Answers
A legal way that designates someone else to make healthcare decisions when he/she is unable to do so is through a document called a healthcare power of attorney. This is a legal document that allows an individual (referred to as the "principal") to appoint a trusted person (referred to as the "agent" or "attorney-in-fact") to make healthcare decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so due to a medical condition or incapacity.
To create a healthcare power of attorney, the principal must be of sound mind and able to make their own decisions at the time of signing. The document must also be signed in the presence of witnesses or a notary public, depending on the state's requirements. The agent is obligated to make healthcare decisions in accordance with the principal's wishes and preferences, as stated in the document or otherwise communicated to the agent.
In addition to a healthcare power of attorney, some states also recognize a living will, also known as an advance directive. This is a document that allows an individual to specify their end-of-life wishes in advance, such as whether or not they want life-sustaining treatments to be used if they become terminally ill or in a permanent vegetative state. A living will can work in conjunction with a healthcare power of attorney to ensure that the principal's wishes are carried out in the event that they are unable to communicate their wishes themselves.
It is important to note that each state has its own laws regarding healthcare powers of attorney and living wills. It is recommended that individuals consult with an attorney or healthcare professional to ensure that their wishes are properly documented and legally binding.
To know more about attorney:
https://brainly.com/question/31007374
#SPJ11
You are driving in a municipal area and have turned onto the entrance ramp for an expressway;
A: You should signal for merging only when you start to merge.
B: When you merge onto the expressway, you don't need to signal unless you see other traffic.
C: At the start of the ramp you should begin checking for an opening in traffic, and start signaling
for your turn.
Answers
One should follow all the road rule while driving, while turning to entrance ramp of an expressway on should at the start of the ramp check for opening in the traffic and start signaling for their turn.
What is good driving and bad driving?Good driving means being on alert while driving the vehicle and following all the road safety rules like: vision clarity while driving. Bad driving means the bad habits which need to be avoided while driving: don't drink and drive.
While driving in a municipal area and have turned onto the entrance ramp for an expressway the one should at the start of the ramp check for opening in the traffic and start signaling for their turn.
Therefore, it can be said that option C aptly describes the above statement.
Learn more about good driving and bad driving here:
https://brainly.com/question/14893886
A man decided to steal a car he saw parked on a hill. After he got in and started the engine, the car began rolling down the hill. The man quickly discovered that the car's brakes did not work. He crashed through the window of a store located at the bottom of the hill. The man was charged with larceny of the car and with the crime of malicious damage to property. At trial, the judge instructed the jury that if the jury found both that the man was guilty of larceny of the car and that the damage to the store was the result of that larceny, then it should also find him guilty of malicious damage to property. The man was convicted on both counts. On appeal, he argued that the conviction for malicious damage to property should be reversed because the instruction was not a correct statement of the law.
Required:
Should the man's conviction be affirmed?
Answers
The man's conviction for malicious damage to property should be affirmed based on the given information and the judge's instruction to the jury.
The man's actions of stealing the car and subsequently crashing it into the store resulted in both the crime of larceny (stealing the car) and the malicious damage to property (damaging the store). The judge correctly instructed the jury that if they found the man guilty of larceny and determined that the damage to the store was a result of that larceny, then they should also find him guilty of malicious damage to property.
In this case, the man's act of stealing the car directly led to the chain of events that caused damage to the store. Therefore, his conviction for malicious damage to property is justified under the principle of causation. The instruction provided by the judge accurately reflects the legal connection between the two offenses, and the jury's decision to convict the man on both counts is consistent with the law.
Based on these considerations, the man's conviction for malicious damage to property should be affirmed.
To know more about malicious damage, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30927916#
#SPJ11
if a mind reader reads another mindreaders mind whose mind are they reading
Answers
Answer:
Each other's minds(?)
But, perhaps, the second mindreader is not reading the first mindreader's mind, so, the first mindreader is reading the second mindreader's mind.That made no sense.I hope this helped at all.
What major legislation encouraged thousands of immigrants to settle land in the western united states?.
Answers
The primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
What all acts were introduced to set the Western region of the US?It was said that the act was carried out or passed in order to promote economic progress and the expansion of the American West.
It should be noted that the Homestead Act of 1862, which Congress is said to have passed, granted 160 acres of federal land to anyone who would agree to farm the land.
Due to the 160 acres of land that the Homestead Act gave settlers, it is known to have promoted significant migration to the West.
The Homestead Act was therefore a key piece of legislation that encouraged numerous immigrants to buy land in the western United States.
Therefore, the primary piece of legislation that attracted tens of thousands of immigrants to buy land in the Western United States was the Homestead Act.
For more information on Homestead Act, refer to the following:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487
#SPJ4
(a) What is the definition of a contract?
(b) What are the required elements?
Answers
Answer: A contract is a written agreement that you follow by. For example an NBA Player signs a Contract to a Team and he has to play there for the amount of time with their rules and plays for the amount of money said.
The required elements of a contract are, offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, legality, and sometimes a written instrument
Explanation:
This is Ethics class question.
How does the legal inequity of America's past affect inequity
that remains across ethnic lines today? please answer it in essay
form and cited it.
Answers
The racial inequality that was prevalent in America's past has remain across the ethnic lines of today and we can see from the incidents from the various incidents that took place in America. Even though great leaders have fought for the inequality still we could identify such acts for instance during the George Floyd's case.
Racial inequality in a society refers to the unequal distribution of resources, power, and economic opportunity across races. While the discussion of racial inequality in the United States is often focused on economic inequality, racial inequality manifests itself in a variety of ways that impact the well-being of all Americans both individually and collectively. This includes disparities in wealth, education, employment, housing, mobility, health, incarceration rates, and other areas.
Learn more about inequality, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28774329
#SPJ4
allow bartenders and bar owners to be held liable for a plaintiff’s injury although the bartender or bar owner did not directly cause the plaintiff’s injury.
Answers
In some cases, bartenders and bar owners can be held liable for a plaintiff's injury even if they did not directly cause the injury. This is typically known as "dram shop liability" or "social host liability."
Dram shop liability refers to the legal responsibility of a bar or restaurant that serves alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person who then causes harm to others. In these cases, the bar or restaurant can be held liable for the injuries caused by the intoxicated person.Social host liability, on the other hand, applies to individuals who host private parties or events where alcohol is served.
If a host continues to serve alcohol to a visibly intoxicated guest who subsequently causes harm to others, the host can be held responsible for the injuries.The basis for holding bartenders and bar owners liable in these situations is the recognition of their duty to exercise reasonable care in serving alcohol and preventing harm to others. By serving alcohol to a visibly intoxicated person, they may be seen as contributing to the person's impairment and the resulting harm caused.
It's important to note that dram shop liability laws vary by jurisdiction, so the specific rules and standards may differ depending on the state or country. It is recommended to consult local laws and legal professionals for specific guidance in a particular jurisdiction.
To know more about liability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31356106
#SPJ11
what is a attorneys attempt to exclude a juror
Answers
Peremptory challenge
Explanation:
Jurors aren't selected, they are not discarded, which is not exactly the same. Jurors are selected from a pool of registered voters, or registered, etc. (the selection pool varies in different states). The process of selecting possible juries is called voire dire, and attorneys have two ways for discarding jurors:
Challenged for cause and discharge: jurors can be discarded based on personal biases or conflicts of interest.
Peremptory challenge: attorney's representing each side may discharge a certain number of jurors without any specific reason at all.
Answer:
Peremptory Challenge is an attorneys secondary attempt to exclude a juror!
Explanation:
Hope it helped♡ :)
URGENT!!!!
List four (4) costs of criminal behavior by a private security force (business costs or individual costs).
Answers
In conclusion Legal costs, Reputational costs, Financial costs, Personal costs
What are they in brief?
Legal costs: If a private security force engages in criminal behavior, the business or individuals involved may face legal costs such as fines, lawsuits, and even criminal charges.
Reputational costs: Criminal behavior by a private security force can damage the reputation of the business or individuals involved, leading to a loss of trust among customers and the community.
Financial costs: Criminal behavior may lead to loss of clients, contracts, and revenue for the business or individuals involved.
Personal costs: Criminal behavior can have personal costs for the individuals involved, including the loss of their jobs, damage to their reputation, and even imprisonment.
To know more about Criminal Behavior visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30562171
#SPJ1
Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong?
Answers
Answer:::: True.
Explain your answer:
How many out of the thirteen states had to ratify the Constitution in order for it to become the supreme law of the land?.
Answers
The process outlined in the Constitution for ratification sparked heated debate in the states. The Constitution would go into effect after nine of the thirteen state legislatures ratified it; unanimity was not required.
According to Article VII, the document would not become legally binding until nine of the thirteen states ratified it. Beginning on December 7, five states ratified it in quick succession: Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut.The Framers of the Constitution believed that any combination of nine states would constitute a majority of American citizens. Even if all five of the most populous states refused to ratify, the remaining nine would still constitute a majority of the electorate.To know more about ratification of Constitution refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28331681
#SPJ4
Are indigent criminal defendants in Luzerne County receiving their constitutionally protected right to counsel?
Answers
The states Luzerne and localities use a variety of strategies, including public defender programs, assigned counsel, and contract attorney systems, to the provide indigent defense services.
If it is determined that you lack the financial means to hire an attorney, a public defense will be assigned on your behalf. For contempt, Luzerne, and revocation cases, eligibility is taken as given. If you appear to have the financial means to hire your own attorney, the public defender may decline to represent you. The indigent defendants frequently have to spend a lot of time waiting in the jail before speaking with a lawyer.
To learn more about defense, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/12252825
#SPJ1
To interpret the meaning of the Constitution____________ is used. (а) Constituent Assembly Amendment(b) Constituent Assembly Meetings(c) Constituent Assembly Debates(d) None of the above
Answers
Answer:
c number Constituent Assembly Meetings
In RA9184 or the Government Procurement Act, the term Government Underspending refers to a scenario when a certain agency was not able to spend all of its allotted budget for a certain year leading to a low "Budget Utilization". If a budget is unused, the government therefore was not able to perform its duty of providing the country with good services and can lead to low infrastructure project, low employment and corruption. Underspending can happen for one of the following reasons: a. Failed Bidding where bidders and suppliers either are reluctant to bid to the project. b. Poor planning by the Procurement Agency and Bidding Committee. c. Intentional corruption to allot the money for bonuses rather than for projects. This is the reason why senators are proposing to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and just resort to a negotiated bidding where the Government will eliminate the competitive bidding and will just give the rights of doing the projects to big corporations. In your opinion, a. What will be the pros and cons of the proposed Law? b. Do you agree with the proposal? Explain your answer.
Answers
No, I disagree with the proposal to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and favor big corporations for projects.
The proposed law to abolish the Bidding Process of the Procurement Law and resort to negotiated bidding has potential pros and cons. Pros include faster project implementation, involvement of big corporations, and reduced corruption.
However, there are cons such as limited competition, potential for inflated costs, decreased transparency, and favoring big corporations over small businesses.
I do not agree with the proposal as it may undermine fair competition, transparency, and accountability, while potentially excluding smaller businesses and increasing the risk of corruption in procurement processes.
Preserving the Bidding Process promotes fairness, efficiency, and integrity in government procurement.
Learn more about Procurement Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019470
#SPJ4
1. How does social learning theory differ from the psychoanalytic theory? Consider the implications of each theoretical model for responding to delinquent youth.
Answers
Answer and Explanation:
The theory of social learning states that the actions and ways of acting of young delinquents are the result of living with delinquent adults. This is because children have the ability to repeat the behavior of adults, taking for themselves the activities they do. Thus, according to this theory, young delinquents are victims of an inhospitable environment where they live with criminal adults and end up learning these practices.
Psychoanalytic theory, on the other hand, asserts that the acts, activities and personalities of young deliquesentes are innate elements of their id, ego and superego. This indicates that the criminal activities in which they are involved have been reasoned by their own minds and that, therefore, it is necessary to understand their personalities to reach a conclusion about their crimes.
T/F,A group of individuals who have a general interest in the environment have sufficient standing to file a class-action lawsuit against a company polluting a waterway.
Answers
Answer: False
Explanation: A class action lawsuit requires more than just a general or concern about the subject at hand. Class action lawsuits require both a basis of measurable monetary damages to a group of people effected directly by the company or there actions and some measure of malicious intent.
Note: malicious in this case does not necessarily mean the company caused damages to create harm - just that there was some level of awareness to the issue being brought up but no action was taken to prevent/stop/or report the issue
(though it certainly does still apply if the company DID intend for there to be actual harm - which is exceedingly rare)
When not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio
for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in
cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor
per 5 minors.
Answers
It is TRUE that the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
What is the proper minors-supervisor ratio?In Philadelphia, the proper ratio for the supervision of minors is one supervisor for 5 minors.
However, in the remaining states, one supervisor can supervise up to twenty minors.
Thus, it is TRUE that when not part of a school-endorsed function, the proper ratio for supervising minors is one supervisor per 20 minors except in cities of the first class (Philadelphia) where it is one supervisor per 5 minors.
Learn more about the supervision of minors at https://brainly.com/question/23509933
#SPJ1
What is one change you wish tech companies would make to help accomplish this goal?
Answers
Answer:
I'll make a healthy work environment in the organization, as there is a workload on employees. I'll try not to put more pressure on them, by which they might make mistakes in their work. So to avoid these problems, I'll let them work freely.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU PLEASE MARK IT AS BRAINLIESTAssume that you are an assistant buyer at Hollister. The fall merchandise has come in and your boss has
asked you to price the new crew neck sweaters at 75% above cost. Each sweater costs $26.00 wholesale.
What is the retail price? If Holister sold 350 sweaters per day what was the amount of total sales per day?
What is the profit on the sweaters if they sold that amount per day for the week? (assume they are open for 7
days)
Answers
Answer:
$45.50
$15,925 (TOTAL), $507(PROFIT)
$3549
Explanation:
75%=.75
.75*26= 19.5
19.50+26.00= 45.50
350*45.5= 15925 or 19.5*26.00=507 not sure which one you actually want.
507*7 (days)= 3549
Hope this helps:) Have a good day!