Using the partial fractions technique, the function f(x) = x3 can be written as a sum of partial fractions X4+73x2+576 f(x) = X3 X4+73x2+576 Therefore, the integral of the function f(x) is | ) F(x) dx = +C.

Since, distribution is skewed right even after we remove the outlier (600) from the data set. The median is a good measure regardless of whether the outlier is included.

We have a data set represents the dollar amounts of donations collected at the entrance to a free museum during one hour. The data present in above figure. Now, first we determine the median. As we know, median of a data set is equals to the middle value of data set, so sometimes it is called middle value. It is the value which separates upper and lower halves of data sample or population etc. First we ordered the data values in ascending order. In case odd number of data values, median = middle value and in case of even number of terms, median = mean of two middle terms. Now, here data values in ascending order are 1,5,5,5,5,5,10,10,10,15,600. That is total data values = 11 ( odd) , so median

= 6th value = 5.

So, regardless of whether the outlier is included median is good measure in this situation.

For more information about median , visit :

https://brainly.com/question/26177250

#SPJ4

The sequence of natural numbers that leaves a remainder of 3 when divided by 10 is:

3, 13, 23, 33, 43, 53, 63, 73, 83, 93, 103, 113, ...

\(\huge{\mathfrak{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{I\:hope\:this\:helps\:!\:\:}}}}\)

♥️ \(\large{\underline{\textcolor{red}{\mathcal{SUMIT\:\:ROY\:\:(:\:\:}}}}\)

Answer:

x=13

Step-by-step explanation:

Logical expression that is equivalent to: b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

We should analyze each option and compare them to the original statement. The given statement is:

∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

Now let's analyze each option:

a. Not provided.
b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y)): This expression is identical to the given statement, so it is equivalent.
c. ∀y∃x(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression is not equivalent to the given statement because it uses ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y).
d. ∃x∀y(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression swaps the order of quantifiers (∃ and ∀) and uses ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y), so it's not equivalent to the given statement.
e. ∀x∃y(¬P(x)∨¬Q(x,y)): This expression swaps the order of quantifiers (∃ and ∀) but it also has ¬Q(x,y) instead of Q(x,y), so it's not equivalent to the given statement.

After analyzing each option, we can conclude that the logical expression equivalent to the given statement is:

Your answer: b. ∃y∀x(¬P(x)∨Q(x,y))

Learn more about Logical expression.

brainly.com/question/30038488

#SPJ11

Answer:

the New Cone Volume is 0.1875 litres & the Volume of frustum is 11.8125 litres.

Step-by-step explanation:

According To Question,

We have Given A Right Circular Cone, Volume = 12 Litres .

Now, Let The Radius Of the base be r & the height be h .

Volume of Cone = 1/3×π×r²×h

thus, 1/3×π×r²×h=12

π×r²×h=36 → Equation. 1

Now, The new Cone is cut from the Plane Parallel to a base a quarter the way down from the vertex of the base. then the cone is cut at 1/4 from the base . So the Height of new Cone is h/r and the radius is r/4 .

Then, Volume Of new Cone=1/3×π×(r²/16)×(h/4)  ⇔ (Put Value From Equ. 1)

V= 12/64  ⇔ 0.1875 litres of new cone volume .

Then, the volume of Frustum = 12-0.1875 = 11.8125 litres

Answer:

m<DBC = 109

Step-by-step explanation:

8x-27=6x+7

8x=6x+34

2x=34

x=17

8(17)-27= 109

Answer: 109

Step-by-step explanation:

i'm not entirely sure of this answer as its been a while since ive done problems like this, however, i think the steps to solve are setting (8x-27) equal to (6x+7). Once you do that, you can solve for x. Substitute x into angle DBC to find the answer.

After solving the equations, the cost of parasailing will be 99.75 and the cost of surfing will be equal to 75.25.

Mathematical actions are called expressions if they have at least two terms that are related by an operator and include either numbers, variables, or both.

Adding, subtraction, multiplying, and division are all reflection coefficient operations. A mathematical operation such as reduction, addition, multiplication, or division is used to integrate terms into an expression.

The given information in the question is,

Assume the cost of parasailing is x and the cost of surfing is y.

x + y = 175

Total number of people in Parasailing = 16 people

Total number of people in Surfing = 20 people

Total collection done by resort = $3,101

16x + 20y = 3,101

So, the equations will be,

16x+20y=3,101            (i)

x + y = 175                  (ii)

Now, multiply the equation (ii) by 16 and solve the equation,

16x+20y=3,101

16x+16y= 2,800

4y = 301

Now, find the value of y,

y = 301/4

y = 75.25

Then, the value of x will be equal to,

x + y = 175

x+75.25 =175

Solve for x:

x=175-72.25

x = 99.75

To know more about expression:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ2

It seems that your question is not complete, the complete question should be:

A vacation resort offers surfing lessons and parasailing. If a person takes a surfing lesson and goes parasailing, she will pay $175. There are 16 people who go parasailing and 20 people who take surfing lessons. On a Friday, the resort collects a total of $3,101 for activities. How much does each activity cost?

Main answer: RP* = RP.

Supporting answer:

RP* is defined as the set of languages L for which there exists a polynomial-time Turing machine M that, on input w, halts with probability at least 1/2 if w is not in L, and halts with probability at least 1 - 2-l|w| if w is in L. This definition is almost identical to the definition of RP, except that the probability of error is reduced from 1/2 to 2-l|w|. However, RP* and RP are equivalent.

To see that RP* is a subset of RP, note that if a language L is in RP*, then there exists a polynomial-time Turing machine M and a polynomial p such that (i) if we L, then Prųe{0,1 }p(w) [M accepts (w,t)]21-(1/2)lwl and (ii) if w & L, then Prge{0,1}P(w) [M rejects (w,t)] = 1. This means that M can be used as a randomized algorithm for L with error probability at most 1/2. Therefore, L is in RP.

To see that RP is a subset of RP*, note that if a language L is in RP, then there exists a polynomial-time Turing machine M and a constant c such that (i) if we L, then Prųe{0,1}c|w|[M accepts (w,t)] >= 1/2 and (ii) if w & L, then Prge{0,1}P(w) [M rejects (w,t)] < 1/2. By setting p(n) = c * 2n, we obtain a Turing machine M' that satisfies the conditions of RP*. Therefore, L is in RP*.

Know more about polynomial-time here:

https://brainly.com/question/32571978

#SPJ11

One example of such a series is the harmonic series with alternating signs:

∑n1(−1)nn= −1/1 + 1/2 − 1/3 + 1/4 − 1/5 + ...

This series alternates between positive and negative terms, with the magnitude of each term decreasing as n increases. Therefore, we can choose c

n

to be the absolute value of each term, which is always less than 0.0000001 for sufficiently large n.

Additionally, we know that the limit of the sequence of terms is zero, since the terms approach zero as n goes to infinity. However, the series still diverges, as shown by the alternating series test. Therefore, this series satisfies the conditions given in the problem.

Learn more about series here:

https://brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

a) There is not enough evidence to conclude that cars get significantly better fuel economy with premium gasoline.

In order to test the belief that premium gasoline provides better fuel economy, a study was conducted using 10 cars from a company fleet. Each car was randomly assigned either regular or premium gasoline, and the mileage for each tankful was recorded. The data was analyzed to determine if there is a significant difference in fuel economy between the two types of gasoline.

To evaluate this, a paired t-test can be used since the same cars were tested with both types of gasoline. The null hypothesis would be that there is no difference in fuel economy between regular and premium gasoline, while the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a significant difference.

The results of the study would be analyzed using the appropriate statistical test, such as a paired t-test, to determine the p-value. If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (e.g., 0.05), then there would be evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in fuel economy.

Learn more about Gasoline.

brainly.com/question/14588017

Answer:

Explanation:

According to the factor theorem, if we set x+1 to zero, the substitute the x value into the polynomial, if we get a value of zero, then x+1 is a factor of the polynomial, otherwise, it is not

We start by setting x+1 to zero:

Substitute -1 into the polynomial:

This shows that (x+1) is a factor of the polynomial

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

m is number of miles

A: 45+0.21m (45 is the initial cost)

B: 28+0.38m (28 is the initial cost)

To know how in many miles the cost will be equal,

45+0.21m=28+0.38m

0.38m-0.21m=45-28

0.17m=17

m=17/0.17 = 100

So, at 100 miles the cost will be same for company A and B.

Answer: yes

Step-by-step explanation:

it does have a proportional relationship because as the number of days goes on the number of sales increases. it's a direct relationship

Answer:

x = 13.5

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to use the law of sines

sin 27      sin 34

-------  = --------

11            x

Using cross products

x sin 27 = 11 sin 34

x = 11 sin 34/ sin 27

x=13.54901

To the nearest tenth

x = 13.5

Step-by-step explanation:

just keep in mind :

i = sqrt(-1)

that is all we need to know.

from there we know the forever repeating group of 4 "power of i" values :

i¹ = i

i² = sqrt(-1)² = -1

i³ = i²×i = -1×i = -i

i⁴ = i²×i² = -1×-1 = 1

and this repeats now over and over again with the following powers :

i⁵ = i⁴×i = 1×i = i

i⁶ = i⁴×i² = 1×-1 = -1

i⁷ = i⁴×i³ = 1×-i = -i

i⁸ = i⁴×i⁴ = 1×1 = 1

and so on and so on ...

so,

i⁸¹ = i⁸⁰×i = (i⁴)²⁰×i = 1²⁰×i = 1×i = i

i⁵² = (i⁴)¹³ = 1¹³ = 1

i⁹⁹ = i⁹⁶×i³ = (i⁴)²⁴×i³ = 1²⁴×-i = 1×-i = -i

i⁶⁶ = i⁶⁴×i² = (i⁴)¹⁶×i² = 1¹⁶×-1 = 1×-1 = -1

for such questions always look for the modulo (remainder) result when dividing the exponent by 4. and then use the first list or table above.

The completed statement is: A group element x is its own inverse if and only if |x| = 2.

"A group element x is its own inverse if and only if |x| = 2."

Here's a step-by-step explanation:

1. A "group" is a set of elements with a specific binary operation that satisfies certain conditions, like closure, associativity, having an identity element, and every element having an inverse.

2. An "element" is a member of the group, denoted by x in this case.

3. An "inverse" is an element that, when combined with another element using the group operation, results in the identity element of the group.

4. The statement says that x is its own inverse, meaning that when you combine x with itself using the group operation, you get the identity element.

5. |x| represents the order of the element x, which is the smallest positive integer n such that x^n results in the identity element.

6. When x is its own inverse, combining x with itself (x^2) will give the identity element, meaning |x| = 2.

Learn more about group element at: brainly.com/question/5460947

#SPJ11

The SAS states that two triangles that have two pairs of corresponding congruent sides and a pair of corresponding included congruent angles are congruent.

The RHS congruence criterion states that two right triangles that have a congruent pair of hypotenuses and a congruent pair of corresponding sides are congruent.

The SAS congruence criterion is a postulate that shows that if two triangles have two pairs of corresponding congruent sides and a pair of corresponding included congruent angles, then both triangles are equal or congruent to each other.

What is the RHS Congruence Criterion?

The RHS stands for "right angle-hypotenuse-side". This congruence criterion states if two right triangles have congruence hypotenuses and a pair of corresponding congruent sides, then the two right triangles congruent to each other.

In summary, SAS congruence criterion proves that two triangles with two pairs of corresponding congruent sides and a pair of corresponding included congruent angles are congruent, while the RHS congruence criterion proves that two right triangles are congruent if they have equal pair of hypotenuses and a congruent pair of corresponding sides.

Learn more about the SAS and RHS congruence criterions on:

https://brainly.com/question/19026601

#SPJ1

On solving the provided question, by properties of parallel lines we got to know that -  1 - A  2 - C  3 - B  4 - D

When two or more lines cross the intersection line, alternate exterior angles result. These angles are created on a number of sides outside the transverse lines. Any two parallel lines that cross one another create two angles with the horizontal line. In the area between the parallel lines, interior angles are formed, while alternate exterior angles are formed in the area outside the parallel lines.

Matches are -

1 - A

2 - C

3 - B

4 - D

To know more about alternate exterior angles visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2279752

#SPJ1

Answer: an altitude at sea level

Answer:

The answer to the given question is - ¹/₂

Step-by-step explanation:

Given;

\(\frac{2}{5} \times -\frac{3}{7} - \frac{1}{14} - \frac{3}{7} \times \frac{3}{5}\)

Before we apply the distributive property, perform the multiplication operation.

\((\frac{2}{5} \times -\frac{3}{7}) - \frac{1}{14} - (\frac{3}{7} \times \frac{3}{5} )\\\\\frac{-6}{35} - \frac{1}{14} - \frac{9}{35}\)

Now, apply the distributive property, to obtain the final answer,

In distributive property, the following rule is applied;

ax + ay = a(x + y)

\(\frac{-6}{35} - \frac{1}{14} - \frac{9}{35} = \frac{-1}{7} (\frac{6}{5} + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{9}{5} )= \frac{-1}{7} (\frac{12 + 5+ 18}{10} )= \frac{-1}{7} (\frac{35}{10} ) = \frac{-35}{70} = \frac{-1}{2}\)

Therefore, the answer to the given question is - ¹/₂

Answer:

2nd answer choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

The inequality is x-5 greater/equal to -2 which if you simplify gives you x>= 3 and since the second answer choice has a filled-in dot which means equal to and the arrow goes to the right which means greater than.

Step-by-step explanation: To solve for x in this inequality,

your goal is the same as it would be if you were solving an

equation, to get x by itself on one side.

Since 5 is being subtracted from x, add 5 to both sides of the inequality.

On the left, the -5and +5 cancel out and on the right, -2 + 5 is 3.

So we have x ≥ 3.

When graphing, start with a closed dot at +3 because x is

not just greater than +3, it's equal to it as well.

Then draw an arrow to the right, like I have done below.

The statement "Walking on four legs is a sufficient condition for being a dog" is false.

Walking on four legs is not a sufficient condition for being a dog because there are other animals that walk on four legs but are not dogs. A counterexample would be a cat, which is a common example of an animal that walks on four legs but is not a dog. There are also various other animals like horses, cows, and elephants that walk on four legs but are not dogs.

Therefore, walking on four legs is not enough to determine if an animal is a dog, as there are multiple species that fit this description.

Learn ore about sufficient condition statements

brainly.com/question/14619759

#SPJ11

Answer:

comparing the means of three or more groups

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

440m

Step-by-step explanation:

First you would square root the value 12100 to get one of the length of the square.

\(\sqrt{121000}\)=110m

A square has four sides so,

110*4=440m

Answer:

440m

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula of a square's field : a square

So, area is 12,100. Then, let's take this value into the square root.

Now, we found the one edge of this square which is 110m

For finding perimeter, a square has a 4 edge. So, we multiple 110 x 4 = 440m.

The information needed through Email from Alyssa to Stuart to create a personalized budget is:

What is Personalized Budget?

A personal budget, or household budget, simply tracks a household’s money in versus money out. Though a budget can be used to help an individual or family spend less and save more, it is, at its most basic, a planning and tracking tool.

Hello! It was so great catching up with you at the supermarket! You

mentioned that you might be able to help me create a personalized budget.

I am currently employed as a director at a day care center on the corner of 1st and Main Street. My birthday is on June 3. My largest expense is my mortgage payment of $1,200 per month. I picked a house in this neighborhood because it is close to work. Last year, my annual salary was $40 030. Please let me know if you can help!

Thank you,

Alyssa Palmer

Thus, from the above letter, Stuart will need the following;

Learn more about personalized budget from:

https://brainly.com/question/3095918

#SPJ1

Answer:

Infinite amount of solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write systems of equations

4x - y = 7

3y - 12x = -21

Step 2: Rewrite

-y = 7 - 4x

y = 4x - 7

Step 3: Solve for x

Here we see that we would have infinite amount of solutions.

Answer: infinite solutions. Just took the quiz

Step-by-step explanation:

Let \(\(a\)\) and \(\(b\)\) be integers such that \(\(ab = 4\)\). We want to prove that \(\((a - b)^3 - 9(a - b) = 0\).\)

Starting with the left side of the equation, we have:

\(\((a - b)^3 - 9(a - b)\)\)

Using the identity \(\((x - y)^3 = x^3 - 3x^2y + 3xy^2 - y^3\)\), we can expand the cube of the binomial \((a - b)\):

\(\(a^3 - 3a^2b + 3ab^2 - b^3 - 9(a - b)\)\)

Rearranging the terms, we have:

\(\(a^3 - b^3 - 3a^2b + 3ab^2 - 9a + 9b\)\)

Since \(\(ab = 4\)\), we can substitute \(\(4\)\) for \(\(ab\)\) in the equation:

\(\(a^3 - b^3 - 3a^2(4) + 3a(4^2) - 9a + 9b\)\)

Simplifying further, we get:

\(\(a^3 - b^3 - 12a^2 + 48a - 9a + 9b\)\)

Now, notice that \(\(a^3 - b^3\)\) can be factored as \(\((a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2)\):\)

\(\((a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2) - 12a^2 + 48a - 9a + 9b\)\)

Since \(\(ab = 4\)\), we can substitute \(\(4\)\) for \(\(ab\)\) in the equation:

\(\((a - b)(a^2 + 4 + b^2) - 12a^2 + 48a - 9a + 9b\)\)

Simplifying further, we get:

\(\((a - b)(a^2 + 4 + b^2) - 12a^2 + 39a + 9b\)\)

Now, we can observe that \(\(a^2 + 4 + b^2\)\) is always greater than or equal to \(\(0\)\) since it involves the sum of squares, which is non-negative.

Therefore, \(\((a - b)(a^2 + 4 + b^2) - 12a^2 + 39a + 9b\)\) will be equal to \(\(0\)\) if and only if \(\(a - b = 0\)\) since the expression \(\((a - b)(a^2 + 4 + b^2)\)\) will be equal to \(\(0\)\) only when \(\(a - b = 0\).\)

Hence, we have proved that if \(\(ab = 4\)\), then \(\((a - b)^3 - 9(a - b) = 0\).\)

To know more about satisfies visit-

brainly.com/question/16993710

#SPJ11

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

g (h(6))   :

   h (6) =  3 ( 6^2) + 2 = 110

   then g (110) =   sqrt (110)

h (g(5))

    g(5) = sqrt 5

        then h( sqrt5) = 3 ( sqrt5)^2 + 2 = 17

Walking is not safe on the path whenever rabbits have been seen in the area, and berries are ripe along the path. This is formalized by using the →(if-then) and ∧(logical and) operators.

Given information and corresponding atomic propositions:

We need to formalize the given statements in terms of atomic propositions r, b, and w, which are defined as follows:

r: Rabbits have been seen in the area.

b: Berries are ripe along the path.

w: Walking on the path is safe.

Now, let us formalize each of the given statements in terms of these atomic propositions:

a) Berries are ripe along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area.

b: Rabbits have not been seen in the area, and walking on the path is safe, but berries are ripe along the path.

c: If berries are ripe along the path, then walking is safe if and only if rabbits have not been seen in the area.

d: It is not safe to walk along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area, and the berries along the path are ripe.

e) For walking on the path to be safe, it is necessary but not sufficient that berries not be ripe along the path and for rabbits not to have been seen in the area.

Walking is not safe on the path whenever rabbits have been seen in the area, and berries are ripe along the path.

The formalizations in terms of atomic propositions are:

a) b ∧ ¬r.b) ¬r ∧ w ∧

b.c) (b → w) ∧ (¬r → w).

d) ¬w ∧ ¬r ∧

b.e) (¬r ∧ ¬b) → w.b ∧

Berries are ripe along the path, but rabbits have not been seen in the area.

This is formalized by using the ∧(logical and) operator.

(¬r ∧ ¬b) → w: It means For walking on the path to be safe, it is necessary but not sufficient that berries not be ripe along the path and for rabbits not to have been seen in the area.

For more related questions on area:

https://brainly.com/question/1631786

#SPJ8