Three people each have a tendency to lie 1/3 of the time. There is a coin flip that they all see. They all say it's Heads. What's the probability it is actually Heads

Change management is a significant challenge for many organizations during enterprise system implementation due to various factors such as resistance to change, organizational culture, lack of employee engagement, and inadequate communication and training.

During enterprise system implementation, organizations typically undergo significant changes in processes, roles, and technologies. This can lead to resistance from employees who may be accustomed to existing ways of working. Resistance to change can hinder the adoption and utilization of the new system, affecting its success.

Organizational culture also plays a role. If the organization has a rigid or hierarchical culture that is resistant to change or lacks a culture of innovation and learning, it becomes difficult to implement and integrate the new system effectively.

Lack of employee engagement and involvement in the implementation process can further impede change. Employees need to understand the reasons behind the change, how it will benefit them and the organization, and be provided opportunities for input and feedback.

Inadequate communication and training can be a major obstacle. Employees must be informed about the changes, their roles and responsibilities, and be provided with sufficient training to effectively use the new system. Insufficient communication and training can lead to confusion, frustration, and resistance.

Overall, change management is crucial during enterprise system implementation to address these challenges and ensure a smooth transition, user acceptance, and successful adoption of the new system.

To know more about innovation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30929075#

#SPJ4

Using it's concept, there is a 0.726 = 72.6% probability that all 4 cards have distinct characters (letters or numbers).

A probability is given by the number of desired outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes.

A standard deck is given by 4 suits of 13 cards, each with either a number from 1 to 10 or one letter from A, Q or K, hence:

Hence the probability is given by:

p = 48/51 x 45/50 x 42/49 = 0.726.

0.726 = 72.6% probability that all 4 cards have distinct characters (letters or numbers).

More can be learned about probabilities at https://brainly.com/question/14398287

#SPJ1

The third term and fourth term has a sum of 108.

Let's use the formula for the nth term of an exponential sequence:

\(a_n = a_1 * r^{(n-1)}\)

where \(a_1\) is the first term, r is the common ratio, and n is the term number.

We're given that the second term is 9, so we know:

\(a_2 = a_1 * r = 9\)

We're also given that the fourth term is 81, so we know:

\(a_4 = a_1 * r^3 = 81\)

We can use the equation for \(a_2\) to solve for \(a_1\):

\(a_1 * r = 9\\a_1 = 9 / r\)

Substituting this expression for \(a_1\) into the equation for \(a_4\), we get:

\((9 / r) * r^3 = 81\\r^2 = 9\\\)

r = 3 or r = -3

Since we have a common ratio, we can find the third term using either value of r:

\(a_3 = a_2 * r = 9 * 3 = 27\)

Now we can find the sum of the third and fourth terms:

\(a_3 + a_4 = 27 + 81 = 108\)

Therefore, the sum of the third term and fourth term is 108.

Learn more about exponential sequence

brainly.com/question/20320358

#SPJ11

To solve the given integro-differential equation, we can use the Laplace transform method.

First, we take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation and solve for the transformed function Y(s). Then, we inverse Laplace transform Y(s) to obtain the solution y(t) in the time domain.

To convert the integro-differential equation into an initial value problem, we differentiate the equation with respect to t multiple times until the integral term disappears. This results in a differential equation involving derivatives of y(t) only. We can then solve this initial value problem by finding the solution that satisfies the given initial condition.

Finally, we compare the solution obtained from the initial value problem with the solution obtained using the Laplace transform method to verify that they are the same.

To solve part i), we apply the Laplace transform to both sides of the integro-differential equation. After solving for the transformed function Y(s), we take the inverse Laplace transform to obtain y(t).

For part ii), we differentiate the integro-differential equation with respect to t, removing the integral term. We continue differentiating until the equation involves only derivatives of y(t). This results in an initial value problem that can be solved by finding the solution that satisfies the given initial condition.

In part iii), we solve the initial value problem obtained in part ii) to find the solution y(t). We compare this solution with the one obtained from the Laplace transform method in part i) to ensure they are identical, thus confirming the correctness of the solution.

To learn more about differential click here:

brainly.com/question/31383100

#SPJ11

The Implied Equity Risk Premium (ERP) is generally considered a better predictor of future equity risk premium

Implied Equity Risk Premium is derived from the current market prices of stocks and other securities. It represents the difference between the expected rate of return on equities and the risk-free rate of return. Investors' expectations about future returns are embedded in market prices, so the implied ERP reflects the collective wisdom and expectations of market participants. It takes into account current market conditions, investor sentiment, and other relevant factors, making it a forward-looking indicator.

On the other hand, historical geometric average and historical arithmetic average equity risk premium are calculated based on past performance data. While historical averages provide valuable insights into the past behavior of equity risk premium, they may not fully capture the changing dynamics of the market or reflect future expectations.

Learn more about implied ERP at

https://brainly.com/question/31829257

#SPJ4

1)  06x10^-6

2) 5.4x10^6

3)  6x10^1

4) 9x10^-3

The conjecture of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 is that these are prime numbers. The complete sequence is  2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31 .

Any natural number higher than 1 that is not the product of two smaller natural numbers is known as a prime number (or a prime).

The given numbers and their factors are:

2 = 2 × 1

3 = 3 × 1

5 = 5 × 1

7 = 7 × 1

11 = 11 × 1

13 = 13 × 1

17 = 17 × 1

Hence we can conclude that all the numbers given are prime numbers.

The next prime numbers are : 17 ,19 , 23 , 29 , 31 .

To learn more about prime number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13665423

SPJ1

Answer:

y=-16

Step-by-step explanation:

2(y-4)-5(y+8)=0  (distribute the 2 and the negative 5)

2y-8-5y-40=0   (combine like terms)

-3y-48=0    (add 48 to both sides)

-3y=48     (divide both sides by -3)

y=-16

Hope this helps :)

I suppose * is supposed to denote a binary operation with the given definition,

a * b = (a - b)²

as opposed to multiplication, so that, for instance, 1 * 1 = (1 - 1)² = 0.

Using the definition of *, you have

2 * 5 = (2 - 5)² = (-3)² = 9

90 minutes he spend walking .

The greatest power of a variable in a linear equation is always equal to 1. A one-degree equation is another name for it. A linear equation with one variable is typically expressed as Ax + B = 0. Here, the variables x and A and B are constants and coefficients, respectively. A linear equation with two variables often has the form Ax + By = C. Here, the variables are x and y, the coefficients are A and B, and the constant is C. Equations with a degree of 1 are regarded as linear equations. This demonstrates that there are no variables in a linear equation with an exponent bigger than one.

System of equations!

Let x equal minutes walking,

y equal minutes biking.

First equation will be (4.2)x + (5.1)y = 531 for the total amount of calories. Second equation will be x + y = 120 (converted 2 hours into minutes for convenience). Solve for y in the second equation to get y = 120 - x.

You can then plug (120 - x) in for y in the first equation.

Solve for x

4.2x + 5.1(120 - x) = 531

4.2x + 612 - 5.1 x = 531

612 - 531 = 0.9 x

x = 81 / 0.9

x = 90 min.

learn more about the linear equation here :

brainly.com/question/13738061

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 5

y = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 4y = 17

2x + 5y = 25

We multiply the first equation by -2

-2x - 8y = -34

2x + 5y = 25

-3y = -9

y = 3

Now we put 3 in for y and solve for x

x + 4(3) = 17

x + 12 = 17

x = 5

Let's Check the answer

5 + 4(3) = 17

5 + 12 = 17

17 = 17

So, x = 17 and y = 3 is the correct answer.

Answer:

$1,650

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we need to find how much she paid the whole year. 27,700-x=7900. If we subtract 7900 from each side and add x to each side, we get 19,800=x. Therefore, she paid $19,800 in rent the whole year. Since there are 12 months in a year, and each month she paid the same, she paid $1,650 in rent each year, for 19800/12=1650

Answer:

50-15.20 = 34.8 - 8p

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of the angle θ₁, located in Quadrant IV with sin(θ₁) = -13/85, is such that cosθ₁ = 84/85.

In the given scenario, the angle θ₁ is located in Quadrant IV and sin(θ₁) is given as -13/85. We can use the trigonometric identity to determine the value of cosθ₁.

Using the Pythagorean identity sin²θ + cos²θ = 1, we can substitute sin(θ₁) = -13/85:

(-13/85)² + cos²θ₁ = 1

Simplifying:

169/7225 + cos²θ₁ = 1

cos²θ₁ = 1 - 169/7225

cos²θ₁ = (7225 - 169)/7225

cos²θ₁ = 7056/7225

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

cosθ₁ = √(7056/7225)

Since the angle θ₁ is located in Quadrant IV where cosθ₁ is positive, the value of cosθ₁ is:

cosθ₁ = √(7056/7225)

Simplifying the square root:

cosθ₁ = 84/85

Therefore, the value of the angle cosθ₁ is 84/85.

Learn more about trigonometric identity here: https://brainly.com/question/31484998

#SPJ11

The complete question is:

The angle θ₁ is located in Quadrant IV and  sin(θ₁) = -13/85. What is the value of the angle cosθ₁?

The magnitude of the vertical force applied to the horizontal leg in the equivalent force system.

To determine the magnitude of the vertical force applied to the horizontal leg, we need to find the vertical component of the given force system. Looking at the diagram, we observe that the force system consists of a vertical force at point A and a horizontal force at point B. We can use trigonometry to find the vertical component of the force at point A.

Let's denote the magnitude of the force at point A as F_A and the angle it makes with the horizontal leg as θ. The vertical component of the force can be calculated using the formula: Vertical component = F_A * sin(θ).

Since the vertical component of the force should be equal to the force we are trying to find, we can set up the equation: Vertical component = F_vertical.

Now, we can substitute the given values into the equation and solve for F_vertical. Once we have the value, we can round it off to the nearest whole number, as instructed.

Please note that without specific values or angles provided in the problem statement or accompanying diagram, it is not possible to provide a precise numerical answer.

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

a) ∠PQR=65° (alternate interior angles theorem)

∠PRQ = 60° (linear pair)

x = 55° (angles in a triangle add to 180°)

b) ∠APQ and ∠PQR are congruent alternate interior angles.

The expected number of times that both coins have come up tails will be 0.5 or 50%.

The probability of both coins coming up tails on a single flip is 1/4, since each coin has a 1/2 probability of coming up tails and the events are independent. If we flip the coins n times, the number of times both coins come up tails is a binomial random variable with parameters n and 1/4.

The expected value of a binomial random variable is given by np, where p is the probability of success on a single trial. In this case, we have p = 1/4, so the expected number of times that both coins come up tails in n flips is n(1/4). Therefore, if we flip the coins twice simultaneously, the expected number of times that both coins come up tails is (2)*(1/4) = 0.5.

To learn more about coins, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29869268

#SPJ11

Answer:

Britta will accrue approximately $535.63 in interest during the 2.5-year non-payment period.

To calculate the interest accrued during the 2.5-year non-payment period, we can use the formula for simple interest:

Interest = Principal * Rate * Time

In this case:

Principal = $5,000 (the loan amount)

Rate = 4.29% (expressed as a decimal, 0.0429)

Time = 2.5 years

Plugging in these values into the formula, we have:

Interest = $5,000 * 0.0429 * 2.5

Calculating the interest, we get:

Interest = $535.63

This gives us the equation -2x + y = 0 and 4x - 3y = 0, which has the solution x = y/2. Therefore, the eigenvector for λ = 3 is v2 = [1; 2].

a) To find matrix A with eigenvalues 1 and 4 and corresponding eigenvectors v1 and v2 respectively, we can use the formula A = PDP^-1 where P is the matrix of eigenvectors and D is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues.

We know that v1 and v2 are eigenvectors with eigenvalues 1 and 4 respectively, so we can set up the following equations:

Av1 = 1v1 and Av2 = 4v2

Multiplying both sides of each equation by P^-1, we get:

PDv1 = v1 and PDv2 = 4v2

Therefore, P = [v1 v2] and D = [1 0; 0 4], which gives us the matrix A = PDP^-1.

b) To find matrix B with eigenvalues 1 and 3, we can use the same formula A = PDP^-1. However, we don't know the eigenvectors yet. To find them, we can use the characteristic polynomial of B, which is (1-λ)(3-λ) = 0. This gives us eigenvalues λ = 1 and λ = 3.

To find the eigenvectors for λ = 1, we need to solve the equation (B-λI)v = 0, which gives us:

(B-1I)v = 0
[0 1; 1 2][x; y] = [0; 0]

This gives us the equation x + y = 0, so the eigenvector for λ = 1 is v1 = [1; -1].

To find the eigenvectors for λ = 3, we need to solve the equation (B-λI)v = 0, which gives us:

(B-3I)v = 0
[-2 1; 4 -3][x; y] = [0; 0]


Using these eigenvectors and the formula A = PDP^-1, we can find the matrix B = PDP^-1 where P = [v1 v2] and D = [1 0; 0 3].

To learn more about : eigenvector

https://brainly.com/question/17079851

#SPJ11

Answer:

the answer is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 3x+4=22

2. subtract 4 from both sides

3x+4=22

     -4=22

           -4

3. rewrite the equation   3x=18

4. divide 3 from both sides

3x/3=18/3

hint: 3x/3 cancels out so you just have x

5. divide 18 by 3

6.x=6

1) If you want to calculate how much larger the output elasticity with respect to labor is in 1989 versus 1983, you can split the data into two datasets, one for each year, and estimate the output elasticity with respect to labor for each dataset.

2) You can compute a Wald statistic using the equation,  W = (β1,1989 - β1,1983)^2 / [Var(β1,1989) + Var(β1,1983)]

1) Split the data into two separate datasets, one for 1983 and another for 1989, and calculate the output elasticity with respect to labor for each dataset. Then you can compare the two elasticities to determine how much larger the elasticity is in 1989 relative to 1983.

To calculate the output elasticity with respect to labor, you can use the following formula:

Output elasticity with respect to labor = (% change in output) / (% change in labor)

You can estimate the percentage changes in output and labor using the data from each year, and then use the formula above to calculate the output elasticity with respect to labor for each year.

2) To compute a Wald statistic to test the null hypothesis that the intercept and the two elasticities are the same in 1983 as in 1989, you can use the following steps:

Step 1: Estimate the two regression models separately for each year (i.e., 1983 and 1989) using the data from each year.

Step 2: Use the estimated coefficients from each regression model to construct the null hypothesis that the intercept and the two elasticities are the same in 1983 as in 1989.

Step 3: Estimate a new regression model that combines the data from both years and includes a dummy variable for year (i.e., 1983 = 0, 1989 = 1). The regression model should take the form:

Output = β0 + β1 Labor + β2 Land + β3 Year + ε

Step 4: Compute the Wald statistic for the null hypothesis using the following formula:

W = (β1,1989 - β1,1983)^2 / [Var(β1,1989) + Var(β1,1983)]

where β1,1989 and β1,1983 are the estimates of the output elasticity with respect to labor for 1989 and 1983, respectively, and Var(β1,1989) and Var(β1,1983) are the variances of these estimates.

Step 5: Compare the computed Wald statistic to a critical value from the chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom. If the computed Wald statistic exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis that the intercept and the two elasticities are the same in 1983 as in 1989.

Learn more about elasticity here

brainly.com/question/20594319

#SPJ4

The range in which the usage vary is from 682.77  kilowatt-hours to 2867.11  kilowatt-hours.

Given the charge of electricity charge is 6.434 cents  per​ kilowatt-hour.

Fixed customer charge = ​$7.81

Bill range = $51.74 to ​$​192.28

Since every value is in $ , we will first convert cents to dollar

per​ kilowatt-hour charge will be $6.434/100    ( as $1 = 100 cents )

per​ kilowatt-hour charge = $ 0.06434    …(1)

Lets us first find the lower range of usage

Last year's lowest bill was $51.74 (including the customer charge)

So last year lowest bill = $51.74-$7.81  = $43.93   …(2)

We know that (per KWh charge)x(no. of KWh used)=Total bill. …(3)

Substituting the values from (1) & (2) we get

(0.06434)x(no. of KWh used)=$43.93

no. of KWh used=\(\frac{43.93}{0.06434} = 682.77 KWh\)

Similarly we will solve for maximum KWh used

Lets us find the maximum range of usage

Last year's highest bill was $192.28 (including the customer charge)

So last year highest bill = $192.28-$7.81  = $184.47   …(4)

Substituting the value of (1) & (4) in (3) we get

(0.06434)x(no. of KWh used)=$184.47

no. of KWh used=\(\frac{184.47}{0.06434} =2867.11 KWh\)

Therefore ,  the The range in which the usage vary is from 682.77 kilowatt-hours to 2867.11  kilowatt-hours.

Learn more about Ratio here https://brainly.com/question/17489069

#SPJ4

Answer:

Decimal: 9.5

Improper Fraction: 19/2

Percent: 950%

Rounded: 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Can I be brainliest? TYSMM

Answer:

360 × 3 ÷ 8 = 135

360 - 135 = 225

Answer:

73

Step-by-step explanation:

65+42=107 and 180-107=73

Answer:

x= -1.8

Step-by-step explanation:

4x-22=9x+2(1-4x)

2(1 - 4x)

so you have to distribute

new equation

4x-22=9x+2-8x

you combine like terms on the right

9x + 2 -8

+8. +8

17x+2

new equation

4x-22=17x+2

-4x. -4x

-22=13x + 2

-2. -2

-24=13x

-24÷13= - 1.8

X= -1.8

Answer:

\(4x - 22 = 9x + 2 - 4x \\ - x = 24 \\ x = - 24\)

Answer:

7*3=21

8-5=3

21+3-24

Step-by-step explanation: