The world peacekeeping body formed after wwii was called the:________

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say that the major factor in spurring on Iran's development of nuclear weapons in the 1980s was the victory of the Revolutionary forces in Iran, that overthrew the Shah, the last one that ruled over Iran. So in 1981, after the civil war ended, Iran authorities decided to continue the development of nuclear weapons as a way to defend the sovereignty of the country. In that time, the Soviet Union decided to support Iran sending expert scientists to help Iran to develop its own research program.

no explanation but Europe. don't read the explanation

Answer:

because he was being a good person to the union

Explanation:

and the confederacy hated the union (brainliest)

Answer:

The private property of citizens shall not be taken without legal process and compensation.

Explanation:

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution was approved in 1791 and integrated different rights related to crime and civil cases. In terms of private property, this amendment state private property can only be seized by the government for public use if there are a legal process and compensation, this is explained by the Eminent domain in which government has authority over all the national territory, which means it can take any private land. However, in most cases, the government needs first to go through a legal process to show the importance or reasons for taking property and also the government needs to compensate the owner that means paying for the property and the damages taking the property might cause to the owner.

hope this helped!

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

different contexts and time periods. Therefore, it is important to specify the particular event or time frame you are referring to. However, I can provide a general overview of historical events that have had significant impacts on these countries.

Japan:

Impact: Japan experienced significant impacts from World War II, including widespread destruction, loss of life, and economic devastation. The country had to rebuild its infrastructure and economy from scratch.

Punishment: After World War II, Japan was occupied by Allied forces, led by the United States. The occupation aimed to demilitarize and democratize the country, and certain Japanese officials and military leaders were held accountable for war crimes.

Benefit: Over time, Japan managed to rebuild its economy and became one of the world's leading industrial and technological powers. The country has enjoyed a high standard of living, technological advancements, and global influence.

France:

Impact: France has been affected by numerous historical events, including World War II and the colonial era. These events have had social, political, and economic impacts on the country.

Punishment: France faced repercussions after its defeat in World War II, and some French officials and collaborators were held accountable for their actions. Additionally, France has faced criticism and demands for reparations for its colonial policies and actions in countries such as Algeria.

Benefit: France has a rich cultural heritage and has made significant contributions to art, literature, philosophy, and science. The country has also enjoyed economic prosperity and is one of the world's top tourist destinations.

Russia:

Impact: Russia has experienced a series of significant events that have shaped its history, such as the Russian Revolution, the Cold War, and the collapse of the Soviet Union. These events have had profound political, social, and economic impacts on the country

Punishment: During the Soviet era, political repression, purges, and gulags were used as forms of punishment by the Soviet government against perceived enemies of the state. Additionally, Russia faced economic hardships and political challenges during the transition from communism to a market-based economy.

Benefit: Russia has vast natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals, which have contributed to its economic strength. The country also possesses a rich cultural heritage and has made significant contributions to literature, music, and science.

It is important to note that this is a general overview, and the impacts, punishments, and benefits can vary depending on the specific time frame and context being discussed.

Answer: Vladimir Lenin

Explanation:

The expression that was not a feature of the Democratic-Republican Party is Only the leaders of the army rule the country.

Democracy can be described as the political system that focus on the type of the government by the people as well as the government for the people which believe is electing the representatives that will represent the people as well as their interest in government.

It should be noted that in this type of the government, only elected leaders is allowed to rule the country because those leaders were the one that was been choosing by the masses and the public trust them that they will help to understand what the masses want and help them to achieve this.

In conclusion , people will have the freedom to express themselves incase the government are doing things that is against the interest of the public at large.

Therefore, option A is correct.

Read more about Democratic at:

https://brainly.com/question/3710021

#SPJ1

Check the missing options:

Only the leaders of the army rule the country.

only elected leaders rule the country.

people have the freedom to express.

Answer:

one reason was that the intolerable acts resulted in the closing of the city's (boston's) harbor

Explanation:

one act that was a part of the intolerable acts was the boston port act. this act closed the boston harbor, which prevented trade from happening and cut off supplies carried by ships from coming. imagine being one of the colonists living in boston back then and not being able to trade or get your supplies anymore. this was just one of several reasons why the intolerable acts of 1774 angered colonists so much.

hope this helps!

Answer:

A reason the intolerable acts of 1774 angered colonists was because it prevented all trade in the Colonies.

The intolerable act was a trade restriction that was passed by the British parliament in the Colonies. This act stopped every form of trade from taking place in the Colonies till the tea that was destroyed in the Boston tea party was replaced.

This led to a lot of outrage by the colonists. This was part of what led to the American revolution.

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

I think it's b

The brutality of World War I led writers such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway to question the positive, optimistic picture of humanity with which they had grown up.

The most well-known American writers of the previous century include Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald (who was actually only known as "Scott").

Friend, coworker, reader, critic, traveler, expat, "Lost Generation" member...

More than just a talent for the written word, Fitzgerald and Hemingway were close friends. Fitzgerald and Hemingway had public, turbulent, and alcohol-filled lives—both together and apart—and were at once the closest of friends and the most envious of rivals.

Know more about Fitzgerald click:

https://brainly.com/question/28744363

#SPJ4

: Although many of the leaders of the Scientific Revolution had been Christians, the Catholic Church reacted towards the motion with hostility. The Church perceived many scientific discoveries as heresy.

But 4 centuries ago, the concept of a heliocentric photo voltaic machine was once so controversial that the Catholic Church classified it as a heresy, and warned the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei to abandon it.

The Church felt threatened ("both its teachings and authority were below attack"), and attacked some prominent scientists. Bruno was burned at the stake. Galileo was once made to resign his beliefs.

Learn more about Roman Catholic Church here;

https://brainly.com/question/1276486

#SPJ1

Answer:

first man came

good morning

Eggs come from chickens and chickens come from eggs: that’s the basis of this ancient riddle. But eggs – which are just female sex cells – evolved more than a billion years ago, whereas chickens have been around for just 10,000 years. So the riddle is easily solved…or is it?

Taken at face value, there is no doubt that the egg came before the chicken. We tend to think of eggs as the shelled orbs laid by birds from which their chicks hatch – unless we eat them first. But all sexually reproducing species make eggs (the specialised female sex cells). That’s 99.99 per cent of all eukaryotic life – meaning organisms that have cells with a nucleus, so all animals and plants, and everything but the simplest life forms.

We don’t know for sure when sex evolved but it could have been as much as 2 billion years ago, and certainly more than 1 billion. Even the specialised sort of eggs laid by birds, with their tough outer membrane, evolved more than 300 million years ago.

As for chickens, they came into being much later. They are domesticated animals, so evolved as the result of humans purposefully selecting the least aggressive wild birds and letting them breed. This seems to have happened in several places independently, starting around 10,000 years ago.

The wild ancestor of chickens is generally agreed to be a tropical bird still living in the forests of Southeast Asia called the red junglefowl –  with other junglefowl species possibly adding to the genetic mix. From these origins, humans have carried chickens around the world over the past two millennia or more.

So, eggs dramatically predate chickens. But to be fair to the spirit of the riddle, we should also consider whether a chicken’s egg predates a chicken. As humans consistently chose the tamest red junglefowls and bred them together, the genetic makeup of the resulting birds will have shifted. At some stage during this domestication process the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) evolved into a new subspecies, Gallus gallus domesticus, AKA the chicken.

In practice, it is impossible to pinpoint the moment when this happened. But in theory, at some point two junglefowl bred and their offspring was genetically different enough from the species of its parents to be classified as a chicken. This chicken would have developed within a junglefowl egg and only produced the very first chicken’s egg on reaching maturity. Looked at this way, the chicken came first.....

Explanation:

Dutch west India company

Joannes de laet

Some Dutch merchant called the Dutch West India Company owned and controlled the New Netherland colony in North America.

The New Netherland colony was the first Dutch colony and it is also called the New Amsterdam colony.

Read more on this here

brainly.com/question/13322153

Answer:

The bill of rights contains our basic human rights. Without them we won't be allowed to protect ourselves and we won't be allowed to speak freely. We could be jailed for anything because without due process of law(which guarantees that we must be tried by a jury of our peers) we won't be allowed a fair trial. We won't be allowed to practice any religion we please. The goovernment will be allowed to take what they want from anyone they want. The government will become tyrannical.

The impact this shows is that people will fear their government more than anything. Prisons would fill so fast that they'd have to build more. The crime rate will rise. More people would live in poverty. Thsi country could not survive without the bill of rights.

Explanation:

Answer:

The three types of economic resources are natural resources, human resources and capital resources. The economists refer to these as Factors of Production. Natural resources refer to things found in nature; including sun, air, water, minerals, wood and oil. Anything not created by a human being is a natural resource.

God saved Noah and his family from the flood by instructing Noah to build an ark. The ark was a large boat that would keep Noah, his family, and a selection of animals safe during the flood. Here is a step-by-step explanation of how God saved Noah and his family:

1. God warned Noah about the coming flood and instructed him to build an ark.
2. Noah followed God's instructions and built the ark according to the specifications given to him.
3. God instructed Noah to bring his family and a selection of animals onto the ark.
4. Once everyone and everything was on the ark, God caused it to rain for forty days and forty nights.
5. The flood waters covered the entire earth, but Noah, his family, and the animals on the ark were safe.
6. After the flood waters receded, God instructed Noah and his family to leave the ark and repopulate the earth.

In summary, God saved Noah and his family from the flood by instructing Noah to build an ark and bringing them onto it before the flood waters covered the earth.

For more similar questions on God:

brainly.com/question/26172738

#SPJ11

A market condition best determines whether a borrower's interest rate on an adjustable rate loan goes up or down.

Market conditions are terms that refer to the state of an industry or economy. The term is commonly used in connection with stock and real estate markets, which are often described as volatile or stable. These terms are indicators that many people use to influence their decision-making.

The "Market Landscape" section of the plan includes research and analysis on the target market, competitors, business challenges and competitive differentiation of the company. This should contain the best and clearest description of current market conditions.

Four general types of market structure include perfect competition, oligopoly market, monopoly market, and monopolistic competition.

Learn more about market condition:

brainly.com/question/13984729

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

Taking Country B as a comparison to the United States,

Country B  -

1 barrel of oil = 7 hrs

1 ton of coal = 3 hrs

U.S.  -

1 barrel of oil = 4 hrs

1 ton of coal = 5 hrs

Country B has the comparative advantage in coal production over US because it takes less time to produce 1 ton of coal. The opposite is true for oil production as US takes less time for 1 barrel of oil.

Availability and use of a natural resource give a country an advantage over another that does not. It takes less time with easily accessible national resource to produce something; such as oil and coal.

A comparative advantage means that someone can produce something at a lower prize than everyone else. So, here United States can produce the first item on the list ( I assume that it's one barrel of crude oil)  cheaper than the other two countries. This could be for example because the oil is available in the US and does not need to be imported - saving money and workers' time

Nazi policies branded longtime residents of German territory who were not ethnic Germans as inferior non-Aryan subhumans, including the vast majority of Slavs (primarily ethnic Poles, Serbs, Russians, etc.) and most non-Europeans. Nazi racial theory classified Jews as a "Semitic" people of Levantine origins, Roma as a "Indo-Aryan" people of origin from the Indian subcontinent, and most non-Europeans as "

The Slavs were seen by the Nazi policies as non-Aryan Untermenschen (lit., "sub-humans") that needed to be subjugated and wiped out by the Germans.[4] Slavic nations like the Ukrainians, Czechs, Slovaks, Bulgarians, and Croats who worked with Nazi Germany were still seen as not being racially "pure" enough to attain racial theory the status of Germanic peoples, but they were eventually thought of as being ethnically superior to the rest of the Slavs,

Learn more about Nazi policies, from :

brainly.com/question/2515107

#SPJ1

Answer:

It was the first battle of the Revolutionary War

Explanation:

The 25th President of the U.S. McKinley, presided over the country from March 4, 1897, until he was assassinated on September 14, 1901. He was born in the American city of Niles, Ohio.

The four statements that accurately describe the ideas depicted in these cartoons are:

1) The republican party's position was that the gold standard would help business owners.

2) Farmers believed that McKinley could help them become more prosperous.

3)The republican party incorporated some of the issues the populist party raised.

4) Mckinley wanted the united states to become a world leader.

To learn more about McKinley, visit the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/25360920

#SPJ4

Answer:

A. He did not believe in omens

Explanation:

Fundamental principles of the French revolution that were incorporated into the Napoleonic code was the complete security of riches and private property as well as the equality of all male citizens before the law.

The Napoleonic Code curtailed the rights of illegitimate children, stripped women of all personal freedoms, and strengthened men's control over their families. The right to religious freedom and equality before the law were also extended to all male citizens, but colonial slavery was reinstated.

The feudal system was ended. equality prior to the creation of the law. Property rights were granted. The Napoleonic Code eliminated serfdoms and manorial dues, strengthened the power of males over their families, stripped women of their individual rights, and restricted the rights of children born outside of marriage.

To know more about Napoleonic code here

https://brainly.com/question/2895638

#SPJ4

Answer:

According to Goog|e, "A credible source is free from bias and backed up with evidence. It is written by a trustworthy author or organization. There are a lot of sources out there, and it can be hard to tell what's credible and what isn't at first glance. Evaluating source credibility is important for research."

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

Explanation:

Something that is a credible source could usually be spotted through these elements

- Primary source meaning there's proof of when it was written, the author, date and location

- It's relevant to the topic you are studying meaning it answers the questions you asked

- It's not biased (opinionated) it gives the perspective of another interpretation, but backs up why that interpretation isn't factual

- If the source is posted on websites that are "edu" meaning (education) or "org' 8/10 it is reliable as websites like this will never post misleading information

- Numerous perspectives state the same thing as that source

Hope this helps!

Answer:

A) gain voting rights for the newly freed slaves

Explanation:

The Radical Republicans were a faction of the Republican Party that supported more radical measures to promote equality and civil rights for African Americans, including the abolition of slavery and the extension of voting rights to all citizens. They opposed the policies of President Andrew Johnson, who sought to restore the white plantation owners to power in the South, and pushed for legislation that would protect the rights of the newly freed slaves and prevent the return of the Confederacy. The Radical Republicans' goal of gaining voting rights for the newly freed slaves was a key part of their efforts to promote equality and justice in the post-war United States.