NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE!

Answer:

x= amount of times that these kids ride their bikes to school in a week

D = total distance

w = weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 32 cookies

Step-by-step explanation:

8 times 3 is 24

24+8=32 cookies

Answer:

9.407 [with the bar on top]

Step-by-step explanation:

The division results in 9.407407407407407 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The continual repeat of 407 is represented by a 407 with a bar on top.

The amount that Leila needs to pay after the tax is applied is:

P(x) = 1.07*x

We know that Leila buys a dinosaur model with a price of x dollars, and then we need to add a 7% tax.

Remember that an increase (like a tax) of X (a percentage) is written as:

A*(1 + X/100%)

Where A is the initial value.

Here the initial price is x, so the amount that Leila needs to pay is:

P(x) = x*(1 + 7%/100%)

P(x) = x*(1 + 0.07)

P(x) = 1.07*x

Learn more about taxes:

https://brainly.com/question/26316390

#SPJ1

1. The constant 1.2 is the rate of exponential change

2. The function is increasing exponentially

3. It is increasing at the rate of 20% every month.

Exponential functions follow a specific pattern: the output (the value of "f(x)") of the function grows or decays exponentially as the value of "x" changes. This indicates an accelerated growth or drop in the function's values.

Exponential functions are frequently used to simulate exponentially behaving growth or decay processes, including population expansion, compound interest, radioactive decay, and bacterial development.

1. The 1.2  is the constant  from the bracket (1.2)

2. The positive exponent shows increase

3. The 20% is the rate of increase from the bracket (1.2)

Learn more about exponential function:https://brainly.com/question/29287497

#SPJ1

Answer:

x=8

Step-by-step explanation:

23x=184

x=8

Answer:

The answer given by Mia is not reasonable cause, when we sum up the data given by her we will conclude that the expression should be like (12*36) + (24*84) = 1800.

Step-by-step explanation:

Mia has 12 boxes of chocolate chip cookies and 24 boxes of sugar cookies.

Each box of chocolate chip cookies has 36 cookies.

Each box of sugar cookies has 84 cookies.

So, the total number of chocolate chips cookies will be = 12 * 36 ----(i)

And the total number of sugar cookies will be = 24 * 84 -----(ii)

As Mia says she has about 1,800 cookies in all.

So, we can write (i) and (ii) combined as,

(12*36) + (24*84) = 1800

The answer given by Mia is not reasonable cause, when we sum up the data given by her we will conclude that the expression should be like (12*36) + (24*84) = 1800.

Explanation: No, her answer is not reasonable.

Step by Step solution:

According to the given information, Mia has 12 boxes of chocolate chip cookies and 24 boxes of sugar cookies.

Now, each box of chocolate chip cookies has 36 cookies which means she has (36 × 12) = 432 chocolate chip cookies in total, using the unitary method.

Also, each box of sugar cookies has 84 cookies which means she has (84 × 24) = 1008 sugar cookies in total, using the unitary method.

Mia will then have with her in total of [(36 × 12) + (84 × 24)] = 1440 cookies.

It is an incorrect fact that Mia says that she has about 1800 cookies in total.

Hence, Mia has 1440 cookies in total.

To know more about the unitary method:

https://brainly.com/question/24587372

#SPJ1

Answer:

y=4/3x-3

Step-by-step explanation:

+4x-(-3y)=1-1/3

The average rate of change, in simplest form, is -2/5.

What is average rate ?

Divide the change in y-values by the change in x-values to determine the average rate of change. Identifying changes in quantifiable parameters like average speed or average velocity calls for the knowledge of the average rate of change.

The rate of change of the function is its gradient or slope.

The formula for calculating the gradient of a function is expressed as:

\(m=\frac{d y}{d x}=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$$\)

Using the coordinate points from the table (0,41) and (15,35)

Substitute the coordinate into the expression:

\($$\begin{aligned}& m=\frac{35-41}{15-0} \\& m=\frac{-6}{15} \\& m=\frac{-2}{5}\end{aligned}$$\)

To learn more about average rate visit:https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ1

λ (lambda) is a variable in mathematics used to represent an unknown quantity or a function. It is typically used in calculus and algebra to denote the slope of a function or to express rates of change.

In mathematics, the symbol λ (lambda) is often used to represent various concepts depending on the context. In calculus, it is often used as a parameter in functions, particularly in optimization problems, where it can represent a Lagrange multiplier or a scaling factor. In linear algebra, λ is often used to denote an eigenvalue, which is a scalar quantity associated with a square matrix that represents how a transformation changes a vector.

In statistics, λ is often used to represent the rate parameter in the Poisson distribution, which models the probability of a certain number of events occurring in a given time interval. The meaning of λ varies depending on the specific branch of mathematics in which it is being used.

You can learn more about  λ lamda at

https://brainly.com/question/30923725

#SPJ11

Answer:

y-4 =-5(x+1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Point slope form is

y-y1 = m(x-x1) where m is the slope and (x1,y1) is a point on the line

y-4 = -5(x- -1)

y-4 =-5(x+1)

Answer:

y-4 = -5 (x- (-1))

Step-by-step explanation:

blank 1 = -4

blank 2 = -5

blank 3 = -1

It has been theorized that pedophilic disorder is related to irregular patterns of activity in the prefrontal cortex or the frontal areas of the brain. Option D

The prefrontal cortex is an essential part of the brain that has a crucial function in managing executive functions, making logical choices, controlling impulses, and regulating social behavior.

A potential reason for deviant sexual desires and actions in people with pedophilic disorder could be attributed to a malfunctioning region or regions in the brain.

It is crucial to carry out more studies with the aim of identifying the exact neural elements and mechanisms involved, due to the incomplete comprehension of the neurobiological basis of the pedophilic disorder.

Learn more about prefrontal cortex at: https://brainly.com/question/30127074

#SPJ1

Answer:

house

Step-by-step explanation:

I think,look I am just a little kid I am a  10 year old  kid in 5 th grade I am at school I am trying to cheat so sorry if it’s wrong

Answer:

Using the information from the problem, the measurement of ∠A is 55°

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that ΔABC is isosceles. If a triangle is isosceles, then it means that two angles are going to be congruent to each other which are called the base angles. In the problem above, ∠A and ∠C are the base angles so that means that their measurements are going to be equal to each other.

We can use this information in order to solve the problem and find the measurement of ∠A. By doing so, we will set up both expressions and equal them to each other.

m∠A = 3x + 40

m∠C = x + 50

3x + 40 = x + 50

Subtract x on both sides of the equation.

2x + 40 = 50

Subtract 40 from both sides of the equation.

2x = 10

Divide 2 on both sides of the equation.

x = 5

So now that we have our x-value, we will plug this into both angles just to check our work. If they have the same measurement, then we have our answer for the measurement of ∠A.

x = 5

m∠A = 3(5) + 40

m∠A = 15 + 40

m∠A = 55

m∠C = (5) + 50

m∠C = 55

So, the two angles have the same measurements to each other which means they are congruent. Now, we have our answer.

The measurement of ∠A is 55°

By arranging similar terms, we have

since 13a minus a is 12a, the answer is

which corresponds to option 2 from top to bottom

Answer:

Choice 1 and Choice 2

Answer:

1,2 hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

I just did this

The given financial data is: $1500 is deposited into a fund that earns 9.5% annual interest compounded monthly.

We need to find the interest rate per month.

\(The formula to calculate compound interest is given as:A = P (1 + r/n)^(nt),\)where P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate, t is the time the money is invested, n is the number of times that interest is compounded per year, and A is the amount of money accumulated after n years.

Here, the principal amount is $1500, the annual interest rate is 9.5%, the time period is 1 year, and n is 12 (since interest is compounded monthly).

\(So, the monthly interest rate is:r/n = (9.5/100)/12= 0.00791666667\)

\(The exponential growth model for A is given as:A = 1500(1 + 0.00791666667)^t\)

\(The value of an investment after 5 years: A = 1500(1 + 0.00791666667)^5= 1500(1.00791666667)^5\)= \(1500(1.043262781)= $1564.89 (approx)\)

Hence, the interest rate per month is 0.00791666667 and the value (in dollars) of the investment after 5 years is $1564.89 (approx).

To know more about the word amount visits :

https://brainly.com/question/32453941

#SPJ11

Answer:

It's -5 + 3 basicaly because 2 negatives is one positive. So the answer is -2.

We have a transformation for the triangle EFG. In this case is a translation.

We can verify with one of the points which one of the graphs correspond to this transformation.

The transformation is:

(x,y) --> (x-3, y + 1)

We look at point E = (-0.5, 0).

We apply the transformation and get:

(-0.5, 0) --> (-0.5-3, 0+1) = (-3.5, 1)

Then, the graph that has E located in the point (-3.5, 1) is the right one.

The margin of error for the statistical scenario described is 0.0599

To obtain the margin of error , we use the formula:

Inserting the formula as follows:

ME = 2.576 * √(0.791 * (0.209)/306)

ME = 2.576 * 0.0232

ME = 0.0599

Therefore, the margin of error is 0.0599

Learn more on margin of error :https://brainly.com/question/30404882

#SPJ1

Answer: 10 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the length of the shadow "x". We can use the tangent function to relate the angle of elevation to the height of the pole and the length of the shadow:

tan θ = opposite/adjacent

where θ is the angle of elevation, opposite is the height of the pole, and adjacent is the length of the shadow.

In this case, we know that the angle of elevation is such that tan θ = 4/5 and the height of the pole is 8 meters. We want to find the length of the shadow, which we'll call "x".

tan θ = opposite/adjacent

tan θ = 4/5

opposite = 8 meters

adjacent = x meters

Plugging in the given values, we get:

4/5 = 8/x

Multiplying both sides by x, we get:

4x/5 = 8

Simplifying, we get:

x = 10

Therefore, the length of the shadow is 10 meters.

MAKE ME THE BRAINLIEST PLS IF I GOT IT RIGHT

Answer:

(4, 6 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the equations

x - y + 2 = 0 ( subtract - y + 2 from both sides )

x = y - 2 → (1)

2x + y - 14 = 0 → (2)

Substitute x = y - 2 into (2)

2(y - 2) + y - 14 = 0 ← distribute and simplify left side

2y - 4 + y - 14 = 0

3y - 18 = 0 ( add 18 to both sides )

3y = 18 ( divide both sides by 3 )

y = 6

Substitute y = 6 into (1) for corresponding value of x

x = 6 - 2 = 4

solution is (4, 6 )

The sequence of transformation that makes the shapes congruent is rotation then transformation

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The figures

From the figure, we have the shapes to have different orientation but same size

This means that one of the shapes is rotated to form the other

In this case, the rotation is a 90° clockwise

Followed by the rotation is a translation transformation

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/4289712

#SPJ1

To obtain the prediction \(w_*^Tx\) for a test sample x, we need to substitute \(w = X^\)T\alpha into

a) To find the minimizer of the objective function f(w), we need to differentiate it with respect to w, set it equal to zero, and solve for w.

First, we expand the norm term:

\(||Xw - y||^2 = (Xw - y)^T(Xw - y) = w^TX^TXw - 2y^TXw + y^Ty\)

Taking the derivative of f(w) with respect to w and setting it equal to zero, we get:

\(2(X^TXw - X^Ty)\) + 2\lambda w = 0

Rearranging the terms, we have:

\(X^TXw\) + \lambda Iw \(= X^Ty\)

which implies that:

\((X^TX\) + \lambda I)w \(= X^Ty\)

To obtain the minimizer, we need to solve for w, which gives us:

\(w = (X^TX + \lambda I)^{-1}X^Ty\)

To justify that \(X^TX\) + \lambda I is invertible for lambda > 0, we can use the SVD decomposition of X:

X = U\Sigma \(V^T\)

where U and V are orthogonal matrices and \Sigma is a diagonal matrix with the singular values of X. Then, we have:

\(X^TX = V\Sigma^TU^TU\Sigma V^T = V\Sigma^T\Sigma V^T\)

Since \Sigma\(^T\)\Sigma is also a diagonal matrix with non-negative entries, adding lambda I to \(X^TX\) ensures that all eigenvalues are strictly positive, and hence the matrix is invertible.

b) Substituting \(X^Tu\) for w in \(X^TXw\) + \lambda Iw \(= X^Ty\), we get:

\(X^TX(X^Tu)\) + \lambda \(IX^Tu = X^Ty\)

Simplifying, we get:

\(X^T\)(\(X^TX\) + \lambda I)u =\(X^Ty\)

Thus, we have:

\(u = (X^TX + \lambda I)^{-1}X^Ty\)

Substituting this into \(X^Tu\), we get:

\(w = X^T(X^TX + \lambda I)^{-1}X^Ty\)

c) Since \(w = X^T\) \alpha and \(X^T\) represents a linear combination of the columns of X, we can say that w is a linear combination of the columns of X, and hence is "in the span of the data."

d) Substituting \(w = X^T\)\alpha into the expression for a, we get:

\(a = \frac{1}{\lambda}(X^Ty - X^TX(X^T\alpha))\)

Multiplying both sides by \lambda and rearranging, we get:

\(X^TX\)\alpha + \lambda\alpha \(= X^Ty\)

This can be rewritten as:

(\lambda I \(+ X^TX)\)\alpha \(= X^Ty\)

To obtain the expression for \alpha, we can simply solve for \alpha:

\(\alpha = (\lambda I + X^TX)^{-1}X^Ty\)

Note that X^TX is the Gram (kernel) matrix for the standard vector dot product.

e) Substituting \(w = X^\)T\alpha into the expression for Xw, we get:

\(Xw = XX^T\alpha\)

Using the kernelized form of \alpha, we have:

\(Xw = XX^T(\lambda I + XX^T)^{-1}y\)

f) To obtain the prediction \(w_*^Tx\) for a test sample x, we need to substitute \(w = X^\)T\alpha into

To learn more about prediction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17222820

#SPJ11

Answer:

first your going to to change the number to look like this 1000÷ 49.712 and your answer is going to be 20.1158673962 or just 20.1

Step-by-step explanation:

The required greatest difference between the estimate and the true value is 45.

Given that,
Ethan needs to add together two whole numbers and wants to estimate the answer first. He rounds both numbers to 1 significant figure, which gives him 300 and 600 and adds them together to get an estimate of 900.

The rounding of values is superseding a number with an inexact value that has a more ephemeral, more uncomplicated, or more direct representation.

Here,
For the estimated number 900, the least number that can be rounded to the number 900 is 855,
Now,
Difference  = 900 - 855 = 45

Thus, the required greatest difference between the estimate and the true value is 45.

Learn more about round the decimal here;

brainly.com/question/867784

#SPJ1

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to use the distance formula for this problem

\(\sqrt{(x_{2} -x_{1} )^{2} +(y_{2}-y_{1}) ^{2} }\)

\(\sqrt{(-8+8)^{2} +(-2-4)^{2} }\)

\(\sqrt{0+36}\)

The distance between these two points is 6

Answer:

yesssssss!!!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

It is the same number.