Multiply each set of numbers, and match it with its product.​

Engineers can be held most morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations, engineers have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work,

and to take steps to mitigate those consequences. If they fail to do so, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. When engineers develop new technologies, they have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work.

They need to think about how their technology could be used, and whether it could be used to harm people or the environment.

They also need to consider how their technology could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their work results in harm, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

For example, engineers who develop new weapons systems have a responsibility to consider the potential consequences of their work. They need to think about how their weapons could be used,

and whether they could be used to kill or injure innocent people. They also need to consider how their weapons could be misused, and what steps they can take to prevent misuse.

If engineers fail to consider the potential consequences of their work, and their weapons are used to kill or injure innocent people, they can be held morally blameworthy. This is because they have a duty to protect the public from harm, and they have failed to fulfill that duty.

It is important to note that engineers cannot be held morally blameworthy for unforeseeable harms. This is because they did not have the opportunity to anticipate the harm, and they could not have taken steps to prevent it.

For example, engineers who develop new medical treatments cannot be held morally blameworthy if the treatments have unforeseen side effects. This is because the engineers did not have the opportunity to anticipate the side effects, and they could not have taken steps to prevent them.

In conclusion, engineers can be held morally blameworthy for foreseeable harms resulting from technological innovations.

This is because they have a responsibility to anticipate the potential consequences of their work, and to take steps to mitigate those consequences.

To know more about  Engineers click here

brainly.com/question/30592664

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/4 is equivalent to 9/12

Step-by-step explanation:

#Nova

Answer:

80

Step-by-step explanation:

the two hash marks tells us that the side lengths are the same, that means the sides opposite of those angles have the same measurement.

<B = 50

<C = 50

That means that angle x must be 80.  The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180

180 - 50 - 50 = 80

Answer:

\(x + 50 + 50 = 180 \\ x + 100 = 180 \\ x + 100 - 100 = 180 - 100 \\ x = 80\)

x is 80

Step-by-step explanation:

That is an isosceles triangle where two sides are equal and two angles equal

Hello !

\(y=3+x\\y = 3x + 8\)

\(\boxed{y=}3+x\\\boxed{y=} 3x + 8\)

We know that y = y, so :

\(3 + x = 3x + 8\)

3.1 Solve x

\(\\\\\\\\3+x = 3x + 8\\\\3 + x - x = 3x + 8 -x\\\\3 = 2x + 8\\\\3 - 8 = 2x + 8 - 8\\\\-5=2x\\\\x = -\frac{5}{2}\\\\\boxed{x = -2,5}\)

3.2 Solve y

\(y = 3 + x\\\\y = 3 + (-2,5)\\\\y = 3 - 2,5\\\\\boxed{y = 0,5}\)

x = -2,5

y = 0,5

X is the amount of time individual waits at the courthouse to be called for service. X-bar is the mean wait time for a sample of individuals.

What is a random variable?

A random variable is a mathematical representation of a quantity or object that is affected by random events. It is a mapping or function from possible outcomes in a sample space to a measurable space, which is frequently real numbers.

Assume a committee is investigating whether there is excessive time waste in our judicial system. It is curious about the average amount of time people spend at the courthouse waiting to be called for jury duty. The committee polled 81 people who had recently served as jurors at random. The average wait time for the sample was 4 hours, with a standard deviation of 1.2 hours. In words, define the random variables X and.

X is the amount of time individual waits at the courthouse to be called for service. is the mean wait time for a sample of individuals.

The random variable X is the amount of time for which each of the prospective jurors waits at the courthouse before being called for service. is the mean wait time for the given sample of individuals. In the case given,

Hence, X is the amount of time individual waits at the courthouse to be called for service. X-bar is the mean wait time for a sample of individuals.

To learn more about random variables, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17217746

#SPJ4

A list of 6 one digit whole numbers with an average of 5, a median of 6, a range of 9, and no mode is

since the numbers will have no mode so they are all different

Assuming the numbers are: a, b. c. d. e. and f

The average is 5

(a + b + c + d + e + f ) / 6 = 5

a + b + c + d + e + f = 30

The median is 6

(c + d)/2 = 6

c + d = 12  (assume c = 5 and d = 7)

range is 9

f - a = 9, since it is a one digit number a range of 9 is possible for 9 - 0

hence a = 0 and f = 9

substituting assumed values to the average

0 + b + 5 + 7 + e + 9 = 30

b + e + 21 = 30

b + e = 9 (let b = 8and e = 1)

hence the numbers are

0, 1, 5, 7, 8, and 9

Learn more about mean median mode here:

https://brainly.com/question/14532771

#SPJ1

Answer:

X is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

this is because you divide 3 by nine and it equal 3 therefore x equals 3

Answer:

x = 27

Step-by-step explanation:

x/3 = 9

you multiply both sides by 3 so you get the variable by its self

9 times 3 equals 27

so x = 27

hope this helps

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

X intercept (-40,0)

Y intercept: (0, 15)

Step-by-step explanation:

Where the line meets on the x axis, the coordinate is -40, 0 which is the x intercept and as it is for the y intercept, it meets at 0,15

The shaded region corresponding to all values of x and y that satisfy these requirements is shown the graph

Suppose the considered function whose graph is to be made is

f(x)

The values of 'x' (also called input variable, or independent variable) are usually plotted on horizontal axis, and the output values

f(x)

are plotted on the vertical axis.

They are together plotted on the point

(x,y) = (x, f(x))

This is why we usually write the functions as:

y = f(x)

Therefore, the graph is given with shaded region

Learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/14455421

#SPJ1

The probability of getting at least 75% paper towel on a randomly selected roll is 0.85 or 85%

The probability distribution function of X if X ~ U(a,b) is

f(x) = 1/(b-a) if a ≤x≤b

    = 0, otherwise

The amount of paper towel on a roll is distributed between 0 m^2 and 500 m^2

∴ a = 0 and b= 500

f(x) = 1/500 when 0≤x≤500

     =  , otherwise

The probability that a randomly selected roll has 75 m^2 of paper towel on it at least

P( X≥ 75) = \(\int\limits^{500}_{75} {f(x)} \, dx\)

              = \(\int\limits^{500}_{75} {1/500} \, dx\)

              = (1/500) * \([x]_{75}^{500}\)

              = (500 - 75)/ 500

              = 0.85

Find the probability:

brainly.com/question/3266586

#SPJ4

It is crucial to note that a correlation coefficient of 0 does not imply that there is no link between the variables; rather, it indicates that the relationship is not linear.

A correlation coefficient is a statistical measure of the extent to which changes in one variable predict changes in another. The value of a positively linked variable rises or falls in lockstep. Correlation coefficients, in summary, are used to determine the strength and direction of linear correlations between pairs of variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient should be used when both variables are normally distributed; otherwise, Spearman's correlation coefficient should be used. Pearson's correlation coefficient is calculated by dividing the covariance of two variables by the product of their standard deviations.

Here,

A correlation value of 0 denotes that no linear relationship exists between two variables. It indicates that whether one variable rises or decreases, the other variable does not change. In other words, no relationship exists between the two variables.

To know more about correlation coefficient,

https://brainly.com/question/3309937

#SPJ4

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

To find unit rate, you divide 72 by 6.

72/6=12.

So, there are 12 muffins per tray.

-hope it helps

The explicit formula for f^-1 is (x-3)^(1/4) and this is obtained by switching the roles of x and y and solving for y in terms of x.

To find the inverse function of f(x)=x^4+3, we need to switch the roles of x and y, and solve for y.
Let y = x^4+3
Subtract 3 from both sides to get:
y - 3 = x^4
Take the fourth root of both sides to isolate x:
(x^4)^(1/4) = (y-3)^(1/4)
Simplify:
x = (y-3)^(1/4)
So the inverse function of f(x) is:
f^-1 (x) = (x-3)^(1/4)
This is the explicit formula for the inverse function of f(x).
To know more about explicit formula visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18069156

#SPJ11

Mutually exclusive events are events that cannot occur at the same time. If one event happens, the other event cannot happen

If the events A and B are mutually exclusive, then the probability of either A or B occurring is:

P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B)

Therefore, we can find the probability of (A or B) using the given probabilities

P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) = 0.17 + 0.33 = 0.5

So the probability of (A or B) is 0.5.

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

c=a^2+b^2=9^2+40^2=41

Answer:

18 students are not interested in mathematics.

Answer:

12 students

Step-by-step explanation:

If 60% are interested, then we are led to assume 40% are not.  (Although we don't know if the remaining 40% even filled out a response to the question, we'll make the assumption their response was "go fish.")

40% of 30 students is:

0.30*(30) = 12 students

Answer:

|-|-9|| = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

I hoped this hope this helped

the answer is 9

Answer: x-intercept(s): (7/5, 0)

Y intercept(s): (0,−7)

Answer:

The production cost is Rs 12,500

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the production cost be $x

At any point in time

sales price = cost price +( profit percentage* cost price)

Manufacturer gaining 6%

That would be;

x + 6% of x

x + 0.06x

= 1.06x

Wholesaler gaining 8%

= 1.06x + 8% of 1.06x

1.06x + 0.08(1.06x)

= 1.06x + 0.0848x

= 1.1448x

The for the retailer

= 1.1448x + 10% of 1.1448x

= 1.1448x + 0.11448x

= 1.25928x

1.25928x = 15,741

x = 15,741/1.25928

x = 12,500

For the binomial distribution, √npq formula finds the standard deviation.

See the image below for the complete solution to the question:

Find more on the binomial distribution at: brainly.com/question/15278907

#SPJ4

Answer:

Hey There!

Let's solve...

We have

\( \angle \: odb = \angle \: cao \\ \\ \angle \: dbo = \angle \: aco \\ \\ \)

Using AA Criterion of Similarity we have

\( \triangle \: obd \: - \triangle \: oac \\ \\ \)

This implies that

\( \frac{od}{ob} = \frac{oa}{oc} \to \frac{6}{3 + 2 } \: or \: \frac{6}{5} = \frac{oa}{oc} \\ \\ \to \: oa = \frac{6}{5} oc \)

Now,

\(ab = ao - bo \\ \\ = \frac{6}{5}oc - bo = \frac{6}{5}(od - oc) \\ - bo \\ \\ = \frac{6}{5}(6 + 4cm) - 5cm \\ \\ = 7cm \)

Note:Every letters should be in capital, i don't have any option here so i can't do.

Purposive sampling is a sampling technique in which the sample is selected based on the researcher's knowledge and judgment of the population. It is a non-probability sampling method that is commonly used in qualitative research, where the researcher wants to investigate specific characteristics or features of a particular population.

When the selection of the place and, consequently, prospective respondents is subjective, rather than objective, it is called purposive sampling.Purposive sampling is a non-probability sampling technique that is used by researchers when they want to investigate specific characteristics or features of a particular population. In this type of sampling, the selection of the sample is based on the researcher's judgment, knowledge, and experience rather than on random selection.

The researcher chooses individuals, groups, or places that are considered to be representative of the population and that are most likely to provide the desired information. This method is often used in qualitative research, where the researcher is interested in gaining in-depth insights into a particular phenomenon, event, or group.

To know more about method visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29155684

#SPJ11

There are 3,360,276 99-bit strings that contain more ones than zeros.

Consider two cases: strings with exactly 50 ones and strings with exactly 51 ones to determine the number of 99-bit strings that contain more ones than zeros.

Using the formula for combinations, we can calculate the number of 99-bit strings with exactly 50 ones as C(99, 50). This represents choosing 50 positions out of the 99 positions to place the ones.

Calculate the number of 99-bit strings with exactly 51 ones as C(99, 51), which represents choosing 51 positions out of the 99 positions for the ones.

Sum the two cases to find the total number of strings that contain more ones than zeros:

C(99, 50) + C(99, 51) = 99! / (50! × 49!) + 99! / (51! × 48!) = 3,360,276.

Therefore, there are 3,360,276 99-bit strings.

Learn more about strings https://brainly.com/question/31168016

#SPJ11

The limit of the sequence exists, and it's equal to ln(1/23). Therefore, the sequence converges.

The sequence given is {ln(n + 8) - ln(6n + 17n)}, analyse the given sequence and determine if it converges or diverges.

To find the limit of this sequence, we can first simplify it by using the properties of logarithms.

Specifically, we'll use the property ln(a) - ln(b) = ln(a/b). Applying this property, the sequence becomes:

{ln[(n + 8)/(6n + 17n)]}.

Now we can further simplify the sequence as:

{ln[(n + 8)/(23n)]}.

To determine if the sequence converges or diverges, we'll find the limit as n approaches infinity:

lim (n→∞) ln[(n + 8)/(23n)].

To find this limit, we can analyze the argument inside the logarithm:

lim (n→∞) (n + 8)/(23n).

To find this limit, we can divide both the numerator and denominator by n:

lim (n→∞) [(n/n) + (8/n)] / [(23n/n)] = lim (n→∞) [1 + (8/n)] / [23].

As n approaches infinity, the term (8/n) approaches 0:

lim (n→∞) [1 + 0] / [23] = 1/23.

Now, we can rewrite the original limit:

lim (n→∞) ln[(n + 8)/(23n)] = ln(1/23).

The limit exists, and it's equal to ln(1/23). Therefore, the sequence converges, and the limit of the sequence is ln(1/23).

Know more about the " limit of the sequence" click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30647793

#SPJ11

EXPLANATION:

We are given a circle K with radius KG. Note here that line KJ and line KG are both radii of the circle given.

Also we know that a line tangent to a circle at the point of intersecting with the radius forms a 90-degree angle with the radius.

We can now extract the following triangle from the diagram provided;

We now have a right triangle which we shall solve by use of the Pythagorean theorem;

Where we have c as the longest side (hypotenuse) and then a and b are the two other sides. Substituting into the equation above now gives us;

Subtract 36 from both sides;

Take the square root of both sides;

Rounded to the nearest tenth, the answer is;

ANSWER:

The growth constant k for this population is 0.0527289.

The exponential growth model is a mathematical formula that describes population growth. It is typically used to calculate the number of organisms in a population over time. The formula for exponential growth is as follows:

\($$p(t) = p_0e^{rt}$$\)

where p(t) is the population size at time t, p0 is the initial population size, e is Euler's number (approximately 2.718), r is the growth rate, and t is time in years.

\(r: $$r = \frac{ln(\frac{p(t)}{p_0})}{t}$$$$p_0 = 2600$$$$t = 4$$$$p(t) = p_0e^{rt} = 2600e^{4r}$$$$\frac{d p(t)}{d t} = \frac{d}{d t}(2600e^{4r}) = 10400re^{4r}$$$$\frac{d p(t)}{d t} = b - d = 200 - 465 = -265$$$$\frac{d p(t)}{d t} = rp(t)$$$$\implies rp(t) = -265$$$$\implies r(2600e^{4r}) = -265$$$$\implies r = \frac{-265}{2600e^{4r}}$$\)

To solve this equation, we will use the Newton-Raphson method, which involves repeatedly approximating the root of a function using a linear approximation.

Start by choosing an initial value for r, and then use the following formula to get a better approximation of the root:

\($$r_{i+1} = r_i - \frac{f(r_i)}{f'(r_i)}$$\)

where i is the current iteration, f(r) is the function we want to find the root of, and f'(r) is the derivative of f(r).

\(f(r) = r(2600e^{4r}) + 265 and f'(r) = 2600e^{4r} + 4r(2600e^{4r}). We will use an initial guess of r = 0.01.$$r_1 = 0.01 - \frac{0.01(2600e^{0.04}) + 265}{2600e^{0.04} + 4(0.01)(2600e^{0.04})} = -0.00333428$$$$r_2 = -0.00333428 - \frac{-0.00333428(2600e^{-0.013337}) + 265}{2600e^{-0.013337} + 4(-0.00333428)(2600e^{-0.013337})} = 0.0527289$$\)

Therefore, the growth constant k is 0.0527289.

To know more about growth constant click here:

https://brainly.com/question/15567560

#SPJ11

a. The utility of going to Western is 6.4/10

b. The utility of going to York would also be 5.15/10

Decision theory is a branch of mathematics that deals with decision making in the face of uncertainty.

a. If Martha accepts the early admission offer from Western, her utility would be 5/10, since that is the utility of going to Queens.

If Martha waits and gets admitted to Queens, her utility would be 5/10 as well, since that is the utility of going to Queens.

If Martha waits and gets admitted to UTM, her utility would be 9/10.

The probability of getting admitted to Queens is 1, since she is guaranteed admission. The probability of getting admitted to UTM is 6/10. The probability of accepting the early admission offer from Western is 4/10, since it is the complement of the probability of getting admitted to UTM.

Therefore, the expected utility of waiting is ⇒ (1 * 5/10) + (6/10 * 9/10) = 8.4/10. The expected utility of accepting the early admission offer is

⇒ (4/10 * 5/10) = 2/10.

Since Martha is indifferent between the two options, the utility of going to Western is 8.4/10 - 2/10 = 6.4/10

b. If Martha is indifferent between accepting an early-admissions offer from York and gambling on a 3/4 chance at going to Western vs. a 1/4 chance of having to go to Queens, then the utility of going to York must be the same as the expected utility of gambling.

If Martha gambles, her expected utility would be (3/4 * 6.4/10) + (1/4 * 5/10) = 5.15/10.

Therefore, the utility of going to York would also be 5.15/10.

To know more about probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

By using the quadratic formula, the solution to this quadratic equation is equal to -0.5251 or -3.8081.

In Mathematics, a quadratic equation can be defined as a mathematical expression that can be used to define and represent the relationship that exists between two or more variable on a graph. In Mathematics, the standard form of a quadratic equation is given by;

ax² + bx + c = 0

Mathematically, the quadratic formula is modeled or represented by this mathematical expression:

\(x = \frac{-b\; \pm \;\sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}\)

From the information provided, we have the following values;

3x² + 13x + 4 = 0

Where:

a = 3

b = 13

c = 4

Substituting the values into the quadratic formula, we have the following;

\(x = \frac{-(13)\; \pm \;\sqrt{(13)^2 - 4(3)(13)}}{2(3)}\\\\x = \frac{-13\; \pm \;\sqrt{169 - 72}}{6}\)

x = (-13 + √97)/6

x = -0.5251 or -3.8081.

Read more on quadratic equation here: https://brainly.com/question/4053652

#SPJ1