If the defense claims that your testimony does not agree with that of other officers, you should amend your testimony to eliminate possible jury perceptions of a disorganized and ineffective police department.

Answer:

A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:

Rebuttable presumption: Both in common law and in civil law, a rebuttable presumption is an assumption made by a court that is taken to be true unless someone comes forward to contest it and prove otherwise.

For Example

a defendant in a criminal case is presumed innocent until proved guilty.

Yes, verbal contracts valid. Unless they violate the statute of frauds. Option D is the correct answer.

Legally speaking, verbal agreements can frequently be just as binding as written ones. Although they could be very challenging to regulate, you should take solace in the knowledge that there are relevant state and federal laws that can support the enforcement of such contracts and safeguard your legal rights. Even so, placing your agreement in paper is still the best approach to ensure that all parties are protected. Option D is the correct answer.

A sort of agreement involving two or more parties that is established orally rather than through a written document is known as a verbal contract. Regardless of whether an oral agreement comprises all of the components of a contract or not, there are situations when a physical written contract is required in order for the agreement to be enforceable. Option D is the correct answer.

Learn more about Contracts here:

https://brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ4

The implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.

This kind of contract of one where the obligations arose from the mutual agreement and promise whereas the agreement and promise have not been expressed in words.

Therefore, the implied-in-fact contract exist between them despite that Sal decides to take a vacation but doesn’t tell Sam he will not be available for he Friday transaction.

Read more about implied-in-fact contract

brainly.com/question/17201056

#SPJ1

Answer: Dr. Calvin Goddard

Explanation: Valentine's Day Massacre on February, 14, 1929, one of the nation's foremost forensic scientists, Dr. Calvin Goddard, was hired to examine the ballistic evidence. Goddard compared the bullets collected from the crime scene with test bullets fired by a range of firearms.

In civil cases, a/an complaint is filed against the person who is accused of causing harm. That person can then file a/an lawsuit challenging those claims.

A lawsuit is an action in civil court brought by one or more parties against another. A lawsuit can be used to resolve private law disputes between individuals, businesses, or non-profit organizations.

Thus, complaint and lawsuit are correct

For more details lawsuit, about click here

https://brainly.com/question/8205151

#SPJ1

Answer:

if they need an altered diet for religious reasons it shall be granted. religious freedom still applies in prison. alternative meals for christians and muslims are granted, so id assume the same thing applies.

Answer:

George Washington:P

Explanation:

hope this helps homie

Many people believe the first president was George Washington. This is false.

John Hanson was elected to the first presidency by delegates from all thirteen original English colonies. His term began on 5 November 1781. The date the colonies became a nation under international law.

Answer:

c. determine the budget

hope this helps!

Explanation:

The answer is a. Court decisions defining cruel and unusual punishment involve interpretation of the Eighth Amendment.

This statement  explains how the data in the table was affected by Supreme Court decision making.

Suing someone, taking legal action on someone, or making a try at criminal prosecution all refer to taking someone to court. idiom. We'll probably have to sue them, in my opinion. Since they took our money, I want to file a lawsuit against them.

Fundamental differences between criminal and civil courts, general and restricted jurisdiction courts, and appellate and trial courts must be made. Federal, international, and constitutional courts are also present.

To know more about Court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ1

Answer:yes

Explanation:

Answer:

borrowing money on credit

Explanation:

The federal government under the Articles of Confederation had to take out loans from foreign governments, though they also had no way of raising funds from the states to pay back these loans. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government quickly accumulated a large amount of national debt.

Answer:

The judge has the power to determine the quantity of bail based upon factors on the severity of an alleged criminal offense, the  possibility of the defendant will escape the  jurisdiction prior to trial, and the likelihood of the defendant will commit more crimes following their release.

Answer:

Evidence

Explanation:

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.Alternatively, blood recovered from a crime scene that tests show is type B (a class characteristic) could have come from any of the tens of millions of people who share this blood type. If the suspect has type B blood, he remains a suspect. From there, DNA (an individual characteristic) from the suspect and DNA from the blood evidence are tested to determine conclusively whether they match. If, however, the suspect’s blood is type A, he then is excluded as the source of the blood

Answer:

Elderly

Explanation:

Please give the brainliest, really appreciated. Thank you

An active and engaged group of citizens are more likely to view the police favorably.

Citizens make up citizen groups, as their name implies, and elected officials are required to take their concerns into account. There are primarily two causes for this. First and foremost, citizens should be heard because elected officials are required by law to do so. The fact that these people vote and are unlikely to support someone who does not pay attention to their problems is another factor.

This is sometimes referred to as an interest group and is made up of people who work to influence public policy or social change and who have similar interests or concerns.

The following are a few instances group of citizens:

Environmental organisations, like the Greenpeace Club, promote the preservation of the environment and natural resources.

Human rights organisations like Amnesty International and consumer advocacy groups, etc.

Learn more about group of citizens here

https://brainly.com/question/29811746

#SPJ11

right? like nevada please hurry up ;;

In the past, criminologists saw crime victims as passive contributors to their fate, deserving of sympathy, but not of high concern or study.

In the past, criminologists viewed crime victims in a different way than they do today. Criminologists saw crime victims as passive contributors to their fate, deserving of sympathy, but not of high concern or study. According to their perception, the blame for crime lay exclusively with the offender and the criminal justice system. Crime victims' lack of caution or attention made them partly responsible for their fate, according to the previous point of view. According to criminologists, if the victims had acted more vigilantly, they could have avoided the dangers that led to their victimization. As a result, crime prevention efforts focused on instructing the public on how to protect themselves from predators. Furthermore, crime victims' accounts of their experiences were disregarded as emotional and not reliable sources of information. However, victim advocacy groups in the 1970s helped to change criminologists' opinions on crime victims, emphasizing the need for a better understanding of the victim's experience and incorporating their voices in the justice system.

To know more about criminal justice, visit

https://brainly.com/question/28481896

#SPJ11

Answer:

c. Perpetual count of diazepam

Based on the facts provided, it can be argued that the defendant did not commit a crime as they did not have the intent to steal the victim's computer bag.

The defendant's actions of placing their own bag on a nearby table and leaving it unattended were not illegal. It was also not intentional for the defendant to mistakenly take the victim's bag instead of their own as they were in a hurry and not paying attention.

The reason the defendant hasn't committed a crime is that there was a lack of criminal intent and it appears to be a mistake.:

1. Lack of criminal intent: For a crime to be committed, there must be intent to commit the unlawful act. In this case, the defendant accidentally grabbed the victim's computer bag, thinking it was her own. There was no intention to steal the bag.
2. Mistake: The defendant made an honest mistake in picking up the wrong bag, which can happen to anyone. This mistake led to the unintentional taking of the victim's computer bag.
3. Urgent situation: The defendant received an urgent phone call while in the restroom, which caused her to leave Starbucks quickly. This hurried situation likely contributed to her not paying attention and grabbing the wrong bag.

In conclusion, the defendant hasn't committed a crime because there was a lack of criminal intent and the taking of the victim's computer bag was an honest mistake made in a rushed situation.

Know more about crime here:

https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ11

Answer:

2) a concurrent

The humor in Algernon's line "Half of the chaps who get into the Bankruptcy Court are called Algernon" lies in the self-deprecating nature of the statement. Algernon is poking fun at the stereotype associated with his own name, suggesting that many people who share his name end up in financial troubles.

This use of self-deprecation and stereotyping creates a lighthearted and humorous moment in the conversation. Algernon's line "Half of the chaps who get into the Bankruptcy Court are called Algernon" is humorous because it plays on the stereotype of the wealthy and privileged upper class having names like Algernon. The statement suggests that being named Algernon is somehow correlated with going bankrupt, which is a ridiculous and comical notion. Additionally, the line is delivered in a lighthearted and sarcastic tone, adding to its humorous effect.

Learn More about Bankruptcy here :-

https://brainly.com/question/15277574

#SPJ11

Answer:

to completion and you're analysis pls dont a person you trust

The use of information to falsely accuse a company such as it occurred when XYZ ran a story that was not related to the restaurant they wanted to accuse is an example of False light (option C)

The false light is:

A grievance of the laws of the United States that refers to defamation.

They include a person's right to protection against false publicity to the public.

This right must be in balance with freedom of expression.

According to the above, in the situation, the cable channel XYZ incurred false light because they showed a video of a restaurant chain different from the restaurant chain in which there was an outbreak of E. coli.

Therefore, the chain of restaurants in the video would be affected by defamation because it did not correspond to the case of the E. coli outbreak. So the correct answer is C. False light.

Answer: Congress

Explanation: It's Congress, not the IRS, that writes the law, which is the official tax code. “But what's commonly referred to as the tax code includes interpretations of the law by the IRS and Treasury Department, said Eugene Steuerle, a tax policy expert at the Urban Institute.”

Answer:false

Explanation:

Answer:

False would be correct

Answer:

because that if there were no law there would be Robers all in the world

Answer:

The Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to enact legislation and declare war, the right to confirm or reject many Presidential appointments, and substantial investigative powers.

Explanation:

Parties are the most important factor in the organization of the work of Congress. Hence option A is correct .

The two major parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, dominate Congress and determine the majority and minority leadership, committee assignments, and legislative priorities.

Party leaders have significant control over the legislative process, including which bills are brought to the floor for a vote and how legislation is debated and amended. Party discipline is also important in ensuring that members vote in line with the party's agenda and priorities.

In addition, parties are crucial in organizing Congress through their use of committees. Committees are where most of the legislative work is done, and party leaders appoint members to committees based on their expertise and loyalty to the party.

While apportionment and gerrymandering can have an impact on the composition of Congress, parties ultimately have the most significant influence on the organization and functioning of Congress.

Pork, or the practice of inserting pet projects into legislation, can also be a factor in Congress, but it is not as central to the overall organization of the institution.

Learn more about Congress here

https://brainly.com/question/29614236

#SPJ2

Answer:

Theft

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

society sucks