I need help please and thanks

The smallest possible value of doughnuts in each box is 2. The smallest possible value of doughnuts in each box is 2.

In order for Donna to rearrange the remaining doughnuts into bags so that each bag contains the same number of doughnuts and none are left over, the number of doughnuts in each box must be divisible by the number of bags. Since there are no doughnuts left over, this means that the number of doughnuts in each box must be a multiple of the number of bags.

To find the smallest possible value, we need to find the smallest common multiple of the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (since there are 9 possible numbers of bags). The smallest common multiple of these numbers is 2, so the smallest possible value of doughnuts in each box is 2.Therefore, the smallest possible value of doughnuts in each box is 2.

To know more about value visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

Simplifying

2x + 5y = 2

Solving

2x + 5y = 2

Solving for variable 'x'.

Move all terms containing x to the left, all other terms to the right.

Add '-5y' to each side of the equation.

2x + 5y + -5y = 2 + -5y

Combine like terms: 5y + -5y = 0

2x + 0 = 2 + -5y

2x = 2 + -5y

Divide each side by '2'.

x = 1 + -2.5y

Simplifying

x = 1 + -2.5y

Simplifying

5X + 10y = 17

Solving

5X + 10y = 17

Solving for variable 'X'.

Move all terms containing X to the left, all other terms to the right.

Add '-10y' to each side of the equation.

5X + 10y + -10y = 17 + -10y

Combine like terms: 10y + -10y = 0

5X + 0 = 17 + -10y

5X = 17 + -10y

Divide each side by '5'.

X = 3.4 + -2y

Simplifying

X = 3.4 + -2y

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

let length=l

breadth=b

l×b=660

2(l+b)=104

l+b=104/2=52

b=52-l

l×(52-l)=660

52l-l²=660

l²-52l+660=0

l²-22l-30l+660=0

l(l-22)-30(l-22)=0

(l-22)(l-30)=0

l=22,30

when l=22,b=52-22=30

when l=30,b=52-30=22

l>b

so l=30m

b=22m

Answer:

W = 22 m

L = 30 m

Step-by-step explanation:

given:

area is 660square metre and perimeter is 104metre​

find:

the length and breadth of a rectangular plot

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. area of rectangle (A) = L x W

2. Perimeter of a rectangle (P) = 2L + 2W

where:

A = 660 m²

P = 104 m

solve for L using formula 1.

A = L x W

660 = L x W

L =  660 / W

solve W using formula 2 and use L = 660 / W

P = 2L + 2W

104 = 2 (660)  +  2W

               W

104W = 1320 + 2 W²

-2W² + 104W = 1320

solve W using quadratic equation:

W = 22 m; ( 30 m = L)

plugin W=22 into L =  660 / W to solve L:

L = 660 / 22

L = 30 m

Answer:

1 23/25

Step-by-step explanation:

3 1/5 * 3/5

Change the mixed number to an improper fraction

(5*3+1 )/5 = 16/5

16/5 * 3/5 = 48/25

Change to a mixed number

25/25 + 23/25

1 23/25

Answer:

1 23/25

Step-by-step explanation:

turn the mixed number into an improper fraction : 16/5, then multiply straight across: 16/5 x 3/5 = 23/25

The particular solution to the given differential equation is y^2 = x^2 + y0^2, where y0 is the initial value of y at x = 0.

The given differential equation is dy/dx = x/y, where y cannot equal 0. It is a separable differential equation that can be solved by rearranging terms and integrating both sides.

To solve the differential equation dy/dx = x/y, we can begin by rearranging the equation to separate the variables. Multiplying both sides by y and dx, we get y dy = x dx. Now, we can integrate both sides:

∫y dy = ∫x dx

Integrating, we obtain (1/2)y^2 = (1/2)x^2 + C, where C is the constant of integration. Simplifying this equation, we have y^2 = x^2 + C.

To find the particular solution, we need an initial condition. Let's assume that at x = 0, y = y0. Substituting these values into the equation, we get y0^2 = 0^2 + C, which gives C = y0^2.

Therefore, the particular solution to the given differential equation is y^2 = x^2 + y0^2, where y0 is the initial value of y at x = 0.

It's important to note that the solution is valid as long as y ≠ 0, as division by zero is undefined.

Learn more about differential equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31492438

#SPJ11

Answer:

7:16

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of y when x is 9 and the constant of proportionality(k) is 4 is 36.

A ratio is a comparison between two similar quantities in simplest form.

Proportions are of two types one is the direct proportion in which if one quantity is increased by a constant k the other quantity will also be increased by the same constant k and vice versa.

In the case of inverse proportion if one quantity is increased by a constant k the quantity will decrease by the same constant k and vice versa.

Given, x and y vary directly and y is 44 when x is 11.

Let, y ∝ x.

y = kx.

44 = 11k.

k = 44/11.

k = 4.

Now x = 9.

y = 4×9.

y = 36.

learn more about proportion here :

https://brainly.com/question/7096655

#SPJ1

Answer:

34

Step-by-step explanation:

The absolute value of a real number \(a\) is \(a\) when \(a\) ≥ 0, or −\(a\) when \(a\) < 0. The absolute value of −34 is 34.

Hope it helps and have a great day! =D

Answer:

270

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-------------------------------

Parallel lines have equal slopes.

Given line has a slope of m = 1/5.

Use point-slope form and the coordinates of the point (5, - 4) find the parallel line:

Correct choice is D.

Fraction value for 1/4 plus 1/4 is 1/2.

The same denominator and different numerators are considered equivalent fractions in mathematics. For instance, since 2/4 and 3/6 both equal 1, they can both be considered similar fractions. A fraction is a portion of a whole. Equivalent fractions depict identical sections of the total.

It is possible to determine the equivalent fraction of any fraction by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same integer. Equivalent fractions are those that represent the same value despite having different visual characteristics. For instance, if you cut a piece of cake in half and eat one of the pieces, you will have eaten half of the cake.

= 1/4+1/4

= 2/4

= 1/2

Learn more about fraction Visit: brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

What is 1/4 plus 1/4 as a fraction?.

To find the number of points where the graph of the function \(y = 3x^2 - 8x + 8\) intersects the x-axis, we need to determine the values of x that make y equal to zero.

Setting y = 0, we have:

\(0 = 3x^2 - 8x + 8\)

To solve this quadratic equation, we can use the quadratic formula:

\(x = \frac{{-b \pm \sqrt{{b^2 - 4ac}}}}{{2a}}\)

In this case, a = 3, b = -8, and c = 8. Substituting these values into the quadratic formula, we get:

\(x = \frac{{-(-8) \pm \sqrt{{(-8)^2 - 4(3)(8)}}}}{{2(3)}}\\\\x = \frac{{8 \pm \sqrt{{64 - 96}}}}{{6}}\\\\x = \frac{{8 \pm \sqrt{{-32}}}}{{6}}\)

The discriminant \((b^2 - 4ac)\) is negative, which means that the quadratic equation has no real solutions. Therefore, the graph of the function \(y = 3x^2 - 8x + 8\) does not intersect the x-axis.

Hence, the number of points of intersection with the x-axis is zero.

To know more about Number visit-

brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$1,962.00

Step-by-step explanation:

Same explanation as the previous problem

The research design described is an independent factorial design, as it involves randomly assigning participants to different groups and manipulating the independent variable (type of dietary supplement) to examine its impact on the dependent variable (wound healing times).

The research design described in the scenario is an independent factorial design. In this design, the researcher randomly assigns participants to different groups and manipulates the independent variable (type of dietary supplement) to examine its impact on the dependent variable (wound healing times). The independent variable has three levels (Placebo, Vitamin X, and Kale), and each participant is assigned to only one of these levels. This design allows for comparing the effects of different dietary supplements on wound healing times by examining the differences among the three groups.

In this study, the researcher randomly divided the 36 patients into three subgroups, ensuring that each subgroup represents a different level of the independent variable. The participants in each group took their assigned pill-based supplement three times a day for one week, and at the end of the week, their wound healing times were recorded. By comparing the wound healing times among the three groups, the researcher can assess the impact of the different dietary supplements on the outcome variable.

Overall, the study design employs an independent factorial design, which allows for investigating the effects of multiple independent variables (the different dietary supplements) on a dependent variable (wound healing times) while controlling for random assignment and reducing potential confounding variables.

Learn more about divided here: https://brainly.com/question/15381501

#SPJ11

for the one on the left:

distribute: -18x + 27 - 10x = -1

combine like terms: -28x + 27 = -1

subtract 27 from both sides: -28x = -28

divide -28: x = 1

on the right:

distribute: 10x - 15 + 8 = 9

combine like terms: 10x - 7 = 9

add 7 to both sides: 10x = 16

divide: x = 1.6

according to the graph

the center of the circle

Answer:

Exponential decay

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the values are exponentially decreasing.

Answer: 3a-21

Step-by-step explanation:

Apply distributive property

a=3-3*7

Multiply 3*7=21

Answer: 3a--21

Answer: -1000

Step-by-step explanation:

When a neighboring tower produces a shadow that is 37.75 meters long, you get 125.614, rounded to the closest meter, which is 126 of the tower.

The unit strategy is an approach to problem-solving that involves first figuring out the value of a single unit, then multiplying that value to figure out the required value. Simply described, the unit method is used to extract a single unit value from a specified multiple. For instance, 40 pens would cost 400 rupees, which is equal to the cost of one pen. This procedure might be standardized. one nation. anything has a distinctive element. Its adjoint and reciprocal are equal in terms of mathematics (algebra), linear algebra, mathematical analysis, or mathematics of matrices or operators.

given

3.2/ 1.14=x / 44.75

Cross Mutliply:

44.75 * 3.2=1.14x

Divide:

143.2 / 1.14=x

When a neighboring tower produces a shadow that is 37.75 meters long, you get 125.614, rounded to the closest meter, which is 126 of the tower.

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1

Analysing the data and evaluating the claims about the duration of flavor, we use analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the mean flavor intensities of the four gums.

Let's assume we have the following hypothetical data for the flavour intensity ratings:

Participant 1: Gum A: 7,Gum B: 6,Gum C: 8,Gum D: 7

Participant 2: Gum A: 6,Gum B: 5,Gum C: 7,Gum D: 6

Participant 3: Gum A: 8,Gum B: 7,Gum C: 9,Gum D: 8

Participant 4: Gum A: 7,Gum B: 6,Gum C: 8,Gum D: 7

Participant 5: Gum A: 6,Gum B: 5,Gum C: 7,Gum D: 6

We have 5 participants who each chewed 4 different types of gum (A, B, C, D) over 4 days. The flavor intensity ratings were recorded after 2 hours of chewing, ranging from 1 to 9.

To analyze the data and evaluate the claims about the duration of flavor, we can use analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the mean flavor intensities of the four gums. ANOVA helps determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the mean flavor intensities among the groups.

Here are the steps to conduct ANOVA:

Set up hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H₀): The mean flavor intensities of the four gums are equal.

Alternative hypothesis (Hₐ): The mean flavor intensities of the four gums are not equal.

Calculate the sum of squares:

Calculate the total sum of squares (SST) by summing the squared differences between each observation and the overall mean.

Calculate the between-group sum of squares (SSB) by summing the squared differences between each group mean and the overall mean, weighted by the number of observations in each group.

Calculate the within-group sum of squares (SSW) by summing the squared differences between each observation and its respective group mean.

Calculate the degrees of freedom:

Degrees of freedom between groups (dfB) = Number of groups - 1

Degrees of freedom within groups (dfW) = Number of observations - Number of groups

Calculate the mean squares:

Mean square between groups (MSB) = SSB / dfB

Mean square within groups (MSW) = SSW / dfW

Calculate the F-statistic:

F-statistic = MSB / MSW

Determine the critical value or p-value:

Using the F-statistic and degrees of freedom, you can look up the critical value from an F-distribution table or use statistical software to calculate the p-value.

Compare the obtained F-value with the critical value or p-value:

If the obtained F-value is greater than the critical value (or if the p-value is less than the significance level, often 0.05), reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the mean flavor intensities among the gums.

If the obtained F-value is less than the critical value (or if the p-value is greater than the significance level), fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant difference in the mean flavor intensities among the gums.

By following these steps, you can perform an ANOVA analysis to evaluate the claims about the duration of flavor and determine if there is a significant difference in the mean flavor intensities among the four different gums.

Learn more about ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/30459773

#SPJ11

The 85% confidence interval for the population proportion of people who are captured after appearing on the 10 Most Wanted list is estimated to be between the lower endpoint and upper endpoint. The lower endpoint and upper endpoint need to be calculated using the given sample data.

To construct the confidence interval, we use the formula for the confidence interval for a proportion:

CI = p^ +- Z * sqrt((p^ * (1 - p^)) / n)

Where:

CI = Confidence Interval

p^ = Sample proportion (proportion of captured individuals in the sample)

Z = Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (85% confidence level corresponds to a Z-score of approximately 1.440)

n = Sample size (number of suspected criminals in the sample)

Given data:

Sample size (n) = 455

Number captured (x) = 109

First, calculate the sample proportion (p^):

p^ = x / n

Substituting the values:

p^ = 109 / 455 ≈ 0.239

Next, calculate the standard error:

SE = sqrt((p^ * (1 - p^)) / n)

Substituting the values:

SE = sqrt((0.239 * (1 - 0.239)) / 455) ≈ 0.020

Finally, calculate the lower and upper endpoints of the confidence interval:

Lower endpoint = p^ - Z * SE

Upper endpoint = p^ + Z * SE

Substituting the values:

Lower endpoint = 0.239 - 1.440 * 0.020

Upper endpoint = 0.239 + 1.440 * 0.020

Calculating:

Lower endpoint ≈ 0.209

Upper endpoint ≈ 0.269

Therefore, the 85% confidence interval for the population proportion of people who are captured after appearing on the 10 Most Wanted list is approximately 0.209 to 0.269.

know more about confidence interval: brainly.com/question/13067956

#SPJ11

For the given question x + y = 0 is reflexive, x= £y is Transitive, ) x - y is a rational number is transitive, x = 2y is reflexive, xy > 0 is transitive, xy = 0 is reflexive,  x = 1 is transitive,  x = 1 or y = 1 is neither reflexive nor symmetric nor antisymmetric nor transitive.


a)

We have f(x , y) : x + y =0, (x, y) ∈ R

Now, since (x, y) ∈ R

(0, 0) ∈ f(x , y)

Hence it's reflexive

x + y = 0

hence, x = -y

hence f maps the pairs of additive inverse

Therefore for a number a,

(a , -a) ∈ f(x , y) also, (-a , a) ∈ f

but there cannot be a triplet of additive inverse.

Hence f is not transitive

b)

x = ± y

Here any number (a , a) can belong to the relation

Hence, the relation is reflexive

If (a , -a) ∈ R, then (-a , a) ∈ R as well. Hence it's symmetric.

(a , -a) ∈ R (-a , a ) ∈ R, then (a , a) ∈R. Hence its Transitive

c)

R : (x , y) : x - y ∈ Q

a - a = 0 is a rational number hence

(a , a) ∈ Q

Hence R is reflexive

If a - b ∈ Q, the definitely b - a ∈ Q

Hence R is symmetric

Also,

If a - b ∈ Q, b - c ∈ Q then a -c ∈ Q too.

Hence R is transitive

d)

R : x = 2y

If x = 0

then

(0, 0) ∈ R, hence R is reflexive

For any number (a , 2a) ∈ R, then

(2a, a) cannot ∈ R

Hence it is antisymmetric

Similarly

if (2a, 4a) ∈ R, then (a, 4a) cannot belong to R hence it is not transitive

e)

Clearly,

(a , a) ∈ R

Hence it is reflexive.

Also, if (a , b) ∈ R, then (b , a) ∈ R too. Hence it is symmetric

For positive integers a, b, and c

ab > 0, bc>0 and ac>0

Hence (a, b) (b,c) and (a ,c) ∈ R

Hence it is transitive

f)

xy = 0

Here,

(0 , 0) ∈ R

Hence R is reflexive

Here, (a , 0), (0 , a) ∈R hence it is symmetric

but clearl it is not transitive

g)

x = 1

(1 , 1) ∈ R

Since x has to be 1, it is antisymmetric

for case x = 1, y = 1 and z

(x , y) ∈ R (y , z) ∈ R and (x , z) ∈ R

Hence it is transitive
h) The relation R on the set of all real numbers where (x, y) = R if and only if x = 1 or y = 1 is neither reflexive nor symmetric nor antisymmetric nor transitive.

To learn more about relationsrelation
https://brainly.com/question/31328124
#SPJ4

The expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724732.60.

Decision Tree:

To solve the given problem, the first step is to create a decision tree. The decision tree for the given problem is shown below:

Expected Value Calculation: The expected value of the "Buy New" option can be calculated using the following formula:

Expected Value = (Prob. of Prosperity * Payoff for Prosperity) + (Prob. of Recession * Payoff for Recession)

Substituting the given values in the above formula, we get:

Expected Value for "Buy New" = (0.7 * 1,035,332) + (0.3 * -150,000)Expected Value for "Buy New" = 724,732.60

Therefore, the expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724,732.60.

Conclusion:

To conclude, the decision tree is an effective tool used in decision making, especially when the consequences of different decisions are unclear. It helps individuals understand the costs and benefits of different choices and decide the best possible action based on their preferences and probabilities.

The expected value of the "Buy New" option is 724,732.60.

For more questions on expected value

https://brainly.com/question/14723169

#SPJ8

At a significance level of 0.01, we can confidently state that the student's claim is true.

The hypothesis in this question can be stated as follows:

Null Hypothesis: H0: μ1 = μ2 (There is no difference between the mean of four-year college enrollment and two-year college enrollment.)

Alternative Hypothesis: H1: μ1 > μ2 (Mean enrollment of four-year colleges is greater than the mean enrollment of two-year colleges in the United States.)

The significance level (α) is given as 0.01, which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

To calculate the test statistic, we can use the formula:

z = ((X1 - X2) - (μ1 - μ2)) / √((σ1² / n1) + (σ2²  / n2))

Substituting the given values:

z = ((6193 - 4305) - (0)) / √((598²  / 35) + (572²  / 35))

z = 10.33

Since this is a right-tailed test, we need to compare the test statistic with the critical value. At a significance level of 0.01, the critical value is 2.33.

The calculated test statistic (10.33) is greater than the critical value (2.33). Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean enrollment at four-year colleges is higher than at two-year colleges in the United States.

In conclusion, at a significance level of 0.01, we can confidently state that the student's claim is true. The mean enrollment at four-year colleges is higher than at two-year colleges in the United States.

Learn more about significance level

https://brainly.com/question/31519103

#SPJ11

Ans: 55°

Let's draw two parallel line intersecting angle x° and 45° as shown in the photo.

i) a=25° [Being Alternative Angle]

ii) d=15° [Being Alternative Angle]

iii) c= 45°-d[45°=c+d]

=45°-15°

=30°

iv)b=c[Being Alternative Angle]

v)x=a+b[Combining Angle a & b]

=25°+30°

=55°

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:Quotient of 2 and x is 2/x,

9 less than is 9<.

The Answer for the question is (9<(2/x))

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

they are independent, because the result of the second roll is in no way impacted by the result of the first roll.

in both rolls the cube has the same 6 sides. so, the probability of the result of the second roll (just considered by itself) is the same as for the first roll (just by itself).