Help ASAP I GIVE YOU BRAINLEST

What does the painting show?

A. early humans fighting rival hunters
B. early humans worshipping animals
C. early humans living alongside animals
D. early humans fighting an animal attack

Answer:

URL copied to clipboard

As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.

This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).

In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century.  This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945.  But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.

In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.

Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).

Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.

In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.

On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend.  Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).

This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.

Explanation:

Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.

Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.

Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.

Learn more about authoritarian, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30019371

#SPJ2

Harry S. Truman argued that the Taft-Hartley Act was: B. dangerous because it limited the power of unions.

The Taft-Hartley Act can be defined as a Labor Management Relations Act which enacted by the the 80th United States Congress to restrict the activities and power of labor unions in the United States of America.

Historically, President Harry S. Truman initially vetoed and argued that the Taft-Hartley Act was dangerous because it limited the power of of labor unions in the United States of America.

Read more on Taft-Hartley Act here: https://brainly.com/question/10748899

#SPJ1

Answer: About eighty people were accused of practicing witchcraft in a witch-hunt that lasted throughout New England from 1647 to 1663.

Explanation: please brainliest

Answer:To show that they were establishing a system of indirect rule

Explanation:so that successors in south Nigeria believed the local government they inherited was not a indirect  rule continued

Answer:

some people think that any appointment of subordinate agents of govern- Moor and Sir Walter Egerton who instituted the Warrant Chief System did so their successors in Southern Nigeria who believed that the local government system 2 West Africa, No.2 Laws of the Colony of Southern Nigeria , Vol. ii (1908)

Explanation:

Answer:

Reserved

Explanation:

i took the quiz

Answer: Alexander the great, and Phillip

Explanation:

A characteristic of traditional government is B. the chief practices dictatorship.

Traditional government is a system of governance that is based on customs, traditions, and cultural practices that have been passed down from generation to generation.

One of the key characteristics of traditional government is the concentration of power in the hands of a chief or other ruling authority. This ruler may have absolute power and may be able to make decisions without the input or approval of others.

Find out more on traditional governments at https://brainly.com/question/14240859

#SPJ1

The difference in the twentieth-century mass killings in the nations of Cambodia and Yugoslavia were different because D. widespread violence in Yugoslavia was mostly motivated by ethnic and religious hatred.

The mass killings in Cambodia were mostly as a result of a political party, the Communist Khmer Rouge, killing hundreds of thousands in order to maintain control over the nation.

This was different from mass killings in Yugoslavia which was fueled by hatred of other ethnic groups by the Serbians who were mostly Christians and so against the Muslim Bosnians.

In conclusion, option D is correct.

Find out more on the Cambodia genocide at https://brainly.com/question/457133

#SPJ1

Answer:

El blues (cuyo significado es melancolía o tristeza) es un género musical vocal e instrumental, basado en la utilización de notas de blues y de un patrón repetitivo, que suele seguir una estructura de doce compases. Originario de las comunidades afroamericanas del sur de los Estados Unidos a principios del siglo XX, en los años sesenta este género se convirtió en una de las influencias más importantes para el desarrollo de la música popular estadounidense y occidental. Se lo lee en géneros musicales como el ragtime, jazz, bluegrass, rhythm and blues, rock and roll, funk, heavy metal, hip-hop, música country y pop.1​

Este género se desarrolló a través de las espirituales, canciones de oración, canciones de trabajo, rimas inglesas, baladas escocesas e irlandesas narradas y gritos de campo. La utilización de las notas del blues y la importancia de los patrones de llamada y respuesta, tanto en la música como en las letras, son indicativos de la herencia africana-occidental de este género. Un rasgo característico del blues es el uso extensivo de las técnicas "expresivas" de la guitarra (bend, vibrato, slide) y de la armónica (cross harp), que posteriormente influirían en solos de estilos como el rock. Las canciones de blues son más líricas que narrativas; el cantante intenta expresar sentimientos en lugar de contar historias, donde por lo general se manifiestan emociones tales como la tristeza o la melancolía, a menudo debido a problemas en el amor. Esto se logra musicalmente, utilizando las técnicas vocales como «el melisma (sostener una sola sílaba a través de varios lanzamientos), técnicas rítmicas como la sincopación y técnicas instrumentales como ahogar o doblar cuerdas de guitarra en el cuello o aplicar una diapositiva metálica o cuello de botella a las cuerdas de la guitarra .

Explanation:

The blues (whose meaning is melancholy or sadness) is a vocal and instrumental musical genre, based on the use of blues notes and a repetitive pattern, which usually follows a twelve-bar structure.

Music is defined broadly as the act of arranging sound to produce some combination of form, harmony, melody, rhythm, or other expressive elements. Exact definitions of music differ greatly around the world, despite the fact that it is a component of all human communities, a cultural universal.

Originating in the African-American communities of the southern United States at the beginning of the 20th century, in the 1960s this genre became one of the most important influences for the development of American and Western popular music.

Therefore,  It is read in musical genres such as ragtime, jazz, bluegrass, rhythm and blues, rock and roll, funk, heavy metal, hip-hop

Learn more about music here:

https://brainly.com/question/9287051

#SPJ2

Answer:

The fictional character Watson's first name is John. He is the trusted friend and assistant of the famous detective Sherlock Holmes in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's novels and short stories.

Answer:

Expanding existing colonial empires

Explanation:

Social Darwinism takes place in neocolonialism or imperialism (not in the old models, but in contemporary imperialism).  It is a policy of expansion and political and economic dominance and is the result of the exploitation of colonized countries, due to the industrial demand of the emerging powers.  Thus, the purpose of social Darwinism was corroborated by the process of political and economic domination and legitimization of the emerging powers, the so-called neocolonialism.  As a consequence, the conquest of peoples was taking place, which conveyed the idea of a benefit to the conquered people.  Thus, they would be led by people capable of transforming and advancing their people. This gave the conqueror his superiority, since the superior nations had the mission to "civilize" the inferior ones.

Answer: They were being treated poorly by others.

Explanation: In much of Europe during the Middle Ages, Jews were denied citizenship and its rights, barred from holding posts in government and the military, and excluded from membership in guilds and the professions.

Jewish people migrated to the urban areas due to the poor treatment by others with them.

During the year between 1100 and 1600, Jewish people faced a lot of problem related to the social, economical and religious conditions.

They were restricted to the citizenships and their rights, even they were restricted to the government.

Jewish people decided to move to the Europe for the better opportunities.

Learn more about the Jewish people here:-

https://brainly.com/question/12545831

#SPJ2

Isis is associated with hieroglyphic symbols representing motherhood and magic, while Mentuhotep II's hieroglyphs symbolize his royal authority and power as a pharaoh.

First Image: Isis, a prominent goddess in ancient Egyptian mythology, was often depicted with various hieroglyphic symbols. These symbols represented her divine attributes such as motherhood, fertility, and magic. The hieroglyphs associated with Isis would typically include elements like a throne, an ankh (symbol of life), a headdress with horns and a sun disk, and the hieroglyphic sign for a woman.

Second Image: Mentuhotep II, on the other hand, was a pharaoh of the Middle Kingdom period in ancient Egypt. Hieroglyphic representations of pharaohs often showcased royal regalia, such as the double crown, the crook and flail, and the cartouche containing the pharaoh's name. These hieroglyphs conveyed the authority, power, and divine status of the pharaoh.

Comparison: While both Isis and Mentuhotep II would have been depicted in hieroglyphic form, their specific symbols and designs would differ based on their individual roles, attributes, and cultural contexts. The hieroglyphs associated with Isis would emphasize her divine feminine qualities, while Mentuhotep II's hieroglyphs would reflect his royal status as a pharaoh.

Note: The given question is incomplete. The complete question must have the two paintings for reference purposes. Here is the complete question along with the attached paintings:

Look at these two paintings from ancient Egypt. What comparisons can you make?

The two paintings are attached below with this solution.

For more such questions on hieroglyphic symbols:

https://brainly.com/question/17895646

#SPJ8

Answer:

“Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the LORD your God who goes with you. He will not leave you or forsake you.” [Deuteronomy 31:6]

Explanation:

Imperialism lead to WWI as countries like Britain and France expanded their empires, it resulted in increased tensions among European countries.

How imperialism caused WWWI?

Not only did countries fight each other in World War I, but also empires. While eastern empires like Austria-Hungary and Russia reigned over regions connected by land in Europe and North Asia, western European empires like Great Britain and France possessed colonies elsewhere.

The First World War in turn had a significant impact on the balance of imperial power because it helped set the stage for the rivalries that played out throughout the conflict in Europe for imperial territory. The war ended with a treaty that gave the victorious side the right to Germany's foreign territories, and during or shortly after, the Russian, German, Austrian-Hungarian, and Ottoman empires all fell.

To learn more about WWWI click:

https://brainly.com/question/446364

#SPJ1

San Francisco experienced significant changes during the 1970s. The rise of the counterculture movement, the LGBTQ rights movement, and the feminist movement all had a major impact on the city. San Francisco became a center for these movements, and the city's residents organized to fight for their rights. While there were setbacks, such as the passage of Proposition 6, the city continued to make progress toward greater acceptance and equality.

The 1970s was a decade of significant change for San Francisco. The city experienced major social, cultural, and political upheavals during this time, including the rise of the counterculture movement, the LGBTQ rights movement, and the feminist movement. Here's a sequence of events to show what happened in San Francisco during the 1970s:1969 - The Stonewall riots in New York City mark the beginning of the modern LGBTQ rights movement.

San Francisco's LGBTQ community begins to organize more actively.1970 - San Francisco's first "Gay-in" is held in Golden Gate Park. The event is attended by approximately 1,000 people.1972 - The first San Francisco Pride Parade is held. Approximately 2,000 people participate.1973 - The American Psychiatric Association removes homosexuality from its list of mental disorders.1974 - The San Francisco Board of Supervisors passes a gay rights ordinance, making it illegal to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation.1977 - Harvey Milk becomes the first openly gay elected official in California when he is elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

He is assassinated the following year.1980 - San Francisco's LGBTQ community faces a major setback when voters approve Proposition 6, which would have banned gay and lesbian teachers from working in public schools. The measure is later struck down by the courts.

For more such questions on counterculture movement, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/2535517

#SPJ8

Answer:

1) Poor working conditions

2) Poor decisions

Explanation:

Poor working conditions: They weren't good because they worked for days for 11 hours a day, six days a week, and they didn't get a good pay.

Poor decisions: Tsar Nicholas II was unable to rule effectively. He made poor decisions that led to worsening relations with the government and increased hardship for civilians and soldiers alike.

Answer:

Sets Codes Of Conduct For Obeying Laws And Federal Laws

Explanation:

Answer:

sets up and defines the government

To

The National Women's Commission

Ministry of Women and Child Development, Delhi

Subject:  Backwardness of women

Respected sir/ma’am,

I'd like to kindly draw your attention to the fact that women are ill-treated and underrepresented in society's diverse tasks. I would want to suggest prioritizing issues that must be fixed and giving less attention to non-issues. Physical violence against women is a big problem, and vulnerable women are less likely to protect themselves, in contrast to focusing on concerns like online harassment, trolling, and casual misogynist remarks that eventually go away on their own if ignored or if one ignores social media.

Please think about the issue and some possible solutions, such as more encouragement for women in the job.

Thank you

Sincerely

(Name)

Learn more about the Backwardness of women here

https://brainly.com/question/28037628

#SPJ9

Before the development of slavery in the American colonies, the conditions that indentured servants agreed to was C. They worked until their debt was paid off.

An individual is bound by a contract to work without pay in order to repay an indenture or loan within a set time period. This type of labor is known as indentured servitude. Due to the large number of European immigrants who labored in compensation for the cost of their passage to America in the 1600s, indentured servitude was common in the United States.

Some people took up indentures to pay for their own voyage to America or to get out of debt and poverty. Others, especially prisoners, were immediately sold into indentured servitude.

An example of a contract that was split in two so that each side might have a piece is an indenture. The components were put back together to complete the contract, which served as evidence of the documents' validity.

Find out more on indentured servants at https://brainly.com/question/13431792

#SPJ1

Answer:

Correct answer is chronological order is:

November 1860 - Abraham Lincoln is elected for President,

December 1860 - Secession convention in Columbia, South Carolina,

February 1861 - Creation of  Confederate States of America. Jefferson Davis is elected as a President,

April 12, 1861 - Beginning of war with the attack at Fort Sumter,

July 21, 1861- The Battle of Bull Run,

October 21, 1861- Battle of Ball's Bluff.

Explanation:

The differences between Southern and Northern states led to political animosities. Southern states supported slavery and were against the election is Abraham Lincoln for President. That is why just a couple months later they decided to create the so-called Confederation. The war that lasted for four years devastated the country.

Answer:

November 1860 - Abraham Lincoln is elected for President,

December 1860 - Secession convention in Columbia, South Carolina,

February 1861 - Creation of  Confederate States of America. Jefferson Davis is elected as a President,

April 12, 1861 - Beginning of war with the attack at Fort Sumter,

July 21, 1861- The Battle of Bull Run,

October 21, 1861- Battle of Ball's Bluff.  

Explanation:i did it

Answer:

4

Explanation:

Answer:

1

Explanation:

because I was looking for my location

There were several states in the United States that did not have specific legislation on segregation during the Jim Crow era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These states included California, Oregon. Nevada, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska.

Interestingly, many of these states had relatively small African American populations at the time, which may have contributed to their lack of segregation laws. Additionally, these states tended to have higher levels of education and were more urbanized than other areas of the country, which may have also played a role in their more progressive attitudes towards civil rights.

Therefore, the states that did not have segregation laws are California, Oregon. Nevada, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska.

Learn more about segregation, here:

https://brainly.com/question/19904337

#SPJ1

Answer: A) New immigrants helped fuel American industrial growth.

Explanation:

Just took the quiz :)

The statement that described the way through which the new immigrants influenced America in the late 19th century was that the new immigrants helped fuel American industrial growth.

In conclusion, the correct option is A.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/17141328

Answer:

because they have emotions

Explanation:

It is  possible that different parts of Greece had different forms of government by: d) Different kings made different rules about how to govern.

In ancient Greece, the region was divided into different city-states, each with its own government. The form of government varied depending on the ruling king or leader of the city-state. Some city-states were ruled by monarchs, while others were governed by aristocrats or oligarchs. In some cases, the people themselves had a say in how they were governed, and democracy emerged in some city-states.

So, it was possible for different parts of Greece to have different forms of government because each city-state was independent and had its own ruling class or governing body, which decided the type of government they would have.

Learn more about Greece here:https://brainly.com/question/31810

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation: