In order to dissect an argument, one must carefully analyze it paragraph by paragraph.
Note that to analyze a persuasive speech one must follow certain steps.
Parts of speech can be identified and understudied for better understanding.
What are the steps?The steps to analyzing persuasive speech are:
identifying the main points assessing claims for justification and evidenceevaluating logical coherenceconsidering the target audience and reflecting on personal reactions. Detailed notes will be taken and shared.A persuasive speech is a form of communication where the speaker aims to convince or persuade the audience to adopt their viewpoint or take a specific action.
Note that Speech analysis involves examining the content, structure, delivery, and effectiveness of a speech,identifying rhetorical devices, persuasive techniques, and evaluating its impact on the audience.
Learn more about persuasive speech at:
https://brainly.com/question/14047451
#SPJ1
To analyze a persuasive speech, carefully listen to the main points and assess the justification of the claims made. Evaluate the evidence and reliability of the facts provided. Take note of any parts of the speech that are not understood or not persuasive.
Explanation:When conducting an in-depth analysis of a persuasive speech, it becomes paramount to meticulously scrutinize the key points articulated by the speaker while critically assessing the validity of the claims made. This process involves a comprehensive approach.
First and foremost, active listening is key. Repeatedly listening to the speech is advisable to grasp its nuances fully. During this process, it's crucial to maintain detailed notes, organizing them coherently to track the speaker's argument structure.
The backbone of this evaluation is the examination of supporting evidence. Investigate whether the speaker furnishes credible facts, statistics, or anecdotes to bolster their claims. Assess the reliability of these sources to ensure the information presented is trustworthy.
Furthermore, pay close attention to segments of the speech that may have left you unconvinced or perplexed. These points of contention are opportunities for critical analysis. What made them less persuasive? Was it the evidence, the logic, or the delivery?
Ultimately, this rigorous analysis serves to dissect how a speech is constructed, revealing its strengths and weaknesses. It empowers individuals to discern between well-crafted persuasive speeches and those that fall short in achieving their intended impact, fostering a deeper understanding of effective communication.
Learn more about Analyzing a persuasive speech here:https://brainly.com/question/31539434
#SPJ12
Which statement best summarizes the relationship between investments and
productivity?
A. Companies use investments to avoid having to improve
productivity.
B. Companies improve their productivity using money from
investments.
C. Companies with low levels of productivity have no need for
investment.
D. Companies decide on their level of productivity based on their
investments.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Companies improve their productivity using money from investments.
Explanation:
In the capitalist production system, companies require an initial investment of money to be able to produce the goods or services they offer to the market. Thus, this money is used, among other things, for the purchase of inputs, machinery, advertising expenses, etc., aimed at maximizing its returns. Therefore, the more money the company has, the higher its productivity.
Answer:
Companies with poor productivity use investments to become more efficient.
Explanation:
Explain why it is necessary to place a "2" in front of HCl in the reactants in the chemical equation.
Answer:
Explanation:
I can't see the supposed chemical equations, but I'm guessing it's like every other chemical equations.
Now, the 2 added to the front of HCl is just to balance the chemical equation. It is specifying the amount of moles of HCl that is used in the particular reaction.
Essentially, the chemical equation is saying that 2 moles of HCl is reacting with however many moles of the other reactant to give the product you're seeing.
be careful with some of the zoom links posted on here, some of them are definately not child appropriate. if you are that desparate to do that type of stuff online go to a dating cite.
please help me spread this so that the kids that use this will be safe.
Answer:preach and thank you
Explanation:
im a kid.i know i shouldnt do this.but i has a saftey thing to where i only allow ppl under 13 so im not meeting adults
IT'S BEST NOT TO DRIVE IN THE FOG, BUT IF YOU MUST, YOU SHOULD USE:
A. Low-beam lights
B. High-beam lights
C. Fog lights only
High beams
Explanation:
High beam headlights give off a bright glow that goes as far as 350-400 feet in front .
Answer: you should use low beam headlights as well as fog lights if your vehicle has them so I guess it would be low beam lights
Explanation:
In general, explain how the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news.
Answer: In general, the courts have responded to the argument that the First Amendment protects the right to gather news by recognizing that the freedom of the press is an essential part of a democratic society. The courts have held that the First Amendment protects the right of journalists to gather and disseminate news, and that this right is not limited to members of the traditional news media. However, the courts have also recognized that this right is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable restrictions. For example, the courts have held that journalists may be required to testify in court under certain circumstances, such as when the information they possess is relevant to a criminal investigation. Overall, the courts have generally been supportive of the right to gather news, recognizing its importance to a free and democratic society while also balancing it against other important interests, such as public safety and the administration of justice.
Explanation:
Answer:
Some people think that the First Amendment gives them the right to go anywhere and ask anything in the name of journalism. They believe that they can sneak into private property, record confidential conversations, or demand access to government secrets. Well, the courts have a different opinion. They have ruled that the First Amendment does not grant a special privilege to the press that overrides other laws and rights. They have said that journalists must respect the privacy, property, and security of others, and that they cannot use illegal means to obtain information. The courts have also recognized that some information is legitimately classified or restricted for national security or public safety reasons. So, the next time you see a reporter trying to break into a military base or a celebrity's home, don't be surprised if they end up in jail instead of on the front page.
Alanis tries to talk her supervisor out of a business decision she thinks is unethical. Which of the following best characterizes her reaction?
a. loyalty.
b. capitulation.
c. voice.
d. exit.
Answer:
Definitely C!
Explanation:
..... .....
The U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines impose smaller fines on companies that ____.
a. have already established a specific type of compliance program
b. have never before violated ethics principles
The U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines impose smaller fines on corporations that a. have already established a specific type of compliance program.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines offer a framework for sentencing agencies convicted of federal crimes, which includes offenses related to ethics, fraud, and different regulatory violations. These recommendations' goal is to promote consistency and fairness in sentencing whilst also encouraging groups to implement effective compliance applications.
One of the factors considered in figuring out the proper high-quality for a convicted employer is the life and effectiveness of its compliance software. Companies that have already mounted a selected sort of compliance software, which meets sure criteria mentioned in the recommendations, can be eligible for decreased fines.
By incentivizing the establishment of compliance programs, the U.S. Sentencing Commission recognizes the importance of proactive measures taken by using companies to save you misconduct and sell ethical conduct. Such compliance programs typically encompass rules, methods, schooling, monitoring, and reporting mechanisms designed to discover and deter violations of law.
By enforcing smaller fines on companies with set-up compliance applications, the U.S. Sentencing Commission pursuits to encourage agencies to invest in moral practices and take proactive steps to save criminal conduct. It recognizes that those applications can make contributions to a lifestyle of compliance, limit the probability of destiny offenses, and mitigate the overall damage due to crook behavior.
It is important to notice that the effectiveness and implementation of the compliance application are also elements taken into consideration in determining the quantity of the exceptional reduction. Merely having compliance software in an area might not be enough if it is determined to be inadequate or poorly implemented. The hints emphasize the need for sturdy and comprehensive compliance packages which might be tailored to the enterprise's unique risks and continually enforced.
Overall, the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines understand the cost of compliance applications in selling lawful conduct inside agencies and provide an incentive for businesses to establish and preserve effective applications, at the end contributing to a greater moral and compliant enterprise environment.
To know more about U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines,
https://brainly.com/question/31087246
#SPJ4
Which of the following is not a source of law in the U.S.?
Political enactments
Statutory Law
Administrative Law
Case Law
What are the principles of International Law. Explain.
— International law aims to promote the practice of stable, consistent, and organized international relations. The sources of international law include international custom (general state practice accepted as law), treaties, and general principles of law recognized by most national legal systems.
pa brainlest po thank you :)
Hope it helps in you, GOODLUCK!
The House of Representatives impeached the President. During the Senate debate before the
beginning of the impeachment trial phase, a parliamentary rule was offered that requested that
the vote on whether to find the President guilty should be made by secret ballot, rather than by
roll call. A majority of the senators voted in favor of this rule. The President filed a complaint
with a federal district court judge seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot on the
ground that such a practice violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The
Senate majority leader (on behalf of all named parties defendant) filed a motion to dismiss the
complaint. How should the district court rule on the motion?
Answer:
The district court should deny the motion to dismiss the complaint. The President's complaint seeking an injunction against the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial is a valid legal claim. The argument that a secret ballot violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment raises a constitutional issue that merits consideration by the court.
The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of an accused person to confront the witnesses against them. In this case, the use of a secret ballot could potentially impact the President's ability to confront the senators who vote against him. By not knowing the identity of those who cast their votes, the President may be deprived of the opportunity to challenge their credibility or question their motives during the trial.
Given the importance of the constitutional issue raised and the potential impact on the President's rights, the district court should allow the case to proceed and conduct a thorough examination of the arguments presented by both parties. It is within the court's jurisdiction to determine whether the use of a secret ballot in the impeachment trial violates the Confrontation Clause, and such a decision should not be dismissed without proper consideration.
Explanation:
Roger Boisjoly provided a Presidential commission with documents supporting his hypothesis about how the cold temperature had causes the failure of an O-ring on the Space Shuttle Challenger. For this action, Boisjoly was labeled aHeroGood SamaritanWhistleblower
An O-ring seal that malfunctioned due to the exceptionally cold circumstances was to blame for the catastrophe.
How weather caused the loss of the Space Shuttle Challenger?O-ring seal malfunctioned during the exceptionally cold temperatures, which led to the catastrophe. The low temperature behind a powerful cold front was a chilly 26 degrees, far lower than the typical low temperature of 50 degrees. The previous evening, preparations were conducted to stop or lessen the production of ice.
The commission came to the conclusion that the Challenger accident's immediate cause was a failure in the O-rings sealing the aft field joint on the right solid rocket booster, which allowed pressurized hot gases and eventually flame to "blow by" the O-ring and come into contact with the nearby external tank, leading to structural failure.
To learn more about Space Shuttle Challenger refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27078190
#SPJ4
Which military arm began as the emerging nation's volunteer militia?
The
began as the emerging nation's volunteer militia.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
In the Bill of Rights Section 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
How does this law guaranteed and protected the rights of every Filipino Citizens? Which and how it is important to you as a citizen?
What responsibilities come after your rights?
At what point does the common good of society limit your rights?
The provision you mentioned from the Bill of Rights in the Philippine Constitution guarantees and protects the rights of every Filipino citizen in several ways:
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: The law ensures that citizens have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. This means that the government cannot conduct searches or seizures without a valid search warrant or warrant of arrest. The requirement for probable cause and personal determination by a judge helps safeguard individuals from arbitrary intrusions by authorities.
As a citizen, these protections are important because they uphold fundamental rights and freedom , provide a sense of security, and promote the rule of law. They help prevent arbitrary actions by the government and protect individuals from unwarranted intrusion into their private lives and property.
Learn more about freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ11
21. How often are U.S. Senators elected?
A. every year
B. every two years
C. every four years
D. every six years
E. every eight years
Answer:
D. every six years I hope this helps you
Answer:
d, every six years
Explanation:
to provide stability I guess
Do you think Geo-Fencing is an invasion of privacy? Why?
Answer: Law enforcement officers have been using geofencing to find the location data of mobile devices in the area of a committed crime. While this gives them the ability to find a possible suspect, consumers feel it is a violation of privacy for the innocent parties.
Select the correct answer.
Which activity is a violation of intellectual property rights?
O A.
• в.
O c.
O D.
Peter's company utilized natural resources faster than they could be renewed.
Jonathan's company utilized a design that was previously used by a competitor and passed it as their own.
Nathaniel's company suppressed information about their impending takeover from their shareholders.
Katie's company issued a memo within the company that prohibitegl the employees from talking to the media.
The activity that is a violation of intellectual property rights is B. Jonathan's company utilized a design that was previously used by a competitor and passed it as their own.
What are property rights ?Intellectual property rights refer to the legal rights that protect creations of the human intellect, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, among others.
These rights grant creators the exclusive right to use, sell, and license their creations for a set period. Therefore, using someone else's intellectual property without permission, passing it as your own, or infringing on their exclusive rights is a violation of intellectual property rights.
Find out more on intellectual property at https://brainly.com/question/28098616
#SPJ1
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law:____.a. is only a state misdemeanor b. is always a federal crime c. results in prison penalties up to 20 years d. results in a maximum fine of $300,000
Being charged with identity theft in a court of law - results in a maximum fine of $300,000
The unauthorized seizure of another person's property with the purpose to permanently rob them of it is considered theft in law. This might include real assets like cash or personal property as well as intangible assets like trade secrets or private data. Depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the incident, theft is a serious felony that may be punished with fines or imprisonment.
The maximum sentence for identity theft in federal court is 15 years in federal prison, but identity theft cases sometimes also involve other counts that might lengthen the prison term.
For such more question on theft:
brainly.com/question/30293258
#SPJ4
some types of changes to an animal protocol can be approved administratively by veterinary verification and consultation.
T/F
True. Some types of changes to an animal protocol can be approved administratively by veterinary verification and consultation.
In certain cases, some types of changes to an animal protocol can be approved administratively by veterinary verification and consultation. The specific procedures and requirements for protocol changes may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the regulations in place. However, minor or non-substantive changes to an animal protocol that do not significantly impact the welfare of the animals or alter the scientific objectives may be eligible for administrative approval. This allows for a more streamlined process, as veterinary professionals can review and verify the changes without requiring a full review by an institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) or other regulatory bodies. It is important to note that significant changes to animal protocols may still require formal review and approval by the appropriate oversight bodies.
To know more about veterinary verification, click here: brainly.com/question/22353882
#SPJ11
the age discrimination in employment act protects only those workers who are over the age of _____.
The age discrimination in employment act protects only those workers who are over the age of 40.
The laws governing labour in India are referred to as the employment act and labour law. However, in reality, this varies due to the structure of government and the fact that labour is a topic on the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution. Historically, the Indian government at the federal and state levels has strived to provide a high degree of protection for employees. The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 mandates that businesses pay the government-set minimum wage and cap workweeks to 40 hours (9 hours plus an hour for breaks). Since the reward for overtime is 100% of the overall salary, it is strongly discouraged.
Visit here to learn more about Minimum Wages Act : https://brainly.com/question/30238560
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true of the law of diminishing marginal utility?
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as more units of a good are consumed, the marginal utility from the consumption of the next unit becomes lesser.
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that as more units of a good are consumed, the marginal utility from the consumption of the next unit becomes lesser. This statement is true of the law of diminishing marginal utility.
he Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility states that if a single product or service is consumed in large quantities, the utility or satisfaction derived from each extra unit consumed eventually falls. As a result, the marginal utility of consumption decreases. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility is one of the most critical principles of microeconomics. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility applies to both goods and services.
The concept may be extended to the economic concepts of demand and budgeting, as well as other aspects of microeconomics. The law of diminishing marginal utility also asserts that people are inclined to choose the goods and services that provide them with the greatest amount of satisfaction or utility. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility, for example, can be used to explain why individuals may choose to buy several types of goods, even if the marginal utility of consuming these goods is low.
For more such questions on law of diminishing marginal utility
https://brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ11
What is TRUE about witnesses to a crime?
O A. They can be difficult to work with.
O B. They are always open and honest.
O C. They like to cooperate with the police.
OD. They have to be read their Miranda rights.
What is TRUE about witnesses to a crime is that "They can be difficult to work with.". Option A
This is further explained below.
What are witnesses?Generally, A person who either saw or heard the commission of the crime, or who may possess significant information on the offender or the act, is considered to be a witness.
Both the prosecution and the defense have the ability to summon witnesses to the stand and question them about the circumstances surrounding the case.
The actual statements made by the witness in the courtroom are referred to as the testimony.
In legal proceedings, the testimony of witnesses is of the utmost significance. They contribute to a more clear understanding of what took place by providing the judge or jury with all of the information they are aware of about an occurrence.
A witness is a person who is able to provide information that is pertinent to a crime.
Read more about witnesses
https://brainly.com/question/15649802
#SPJ1
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
What kinds of control are available legislatures? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answer:
1. Financial authority: Legislators have the authority to approve budgets and allocate funding to various programs and initiatives.
2. Legislative authority: Legislators have the authority to create and pass laws that govern numerous parts of society.
3. Oversight control: Legislators can investigate and oversee government agencies to ensure they are operating properly.
4. Appointment control: Legislators have the authority to confirm or reject appointments made by the executive branch.
5. Impeachment control: Through the impeachment process, legislatures can remove public officials from office.
All of these checks and balances are necessary for the legislature to keep the government working properly and citizens' rights safeguarded.
Provide TWO (2) examples or situations that
prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less
stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing
country (e.g., laws r
TWO examples or situations that prompt a MNC from a developed country to take advantage of the less stringent laws and regulations of the local market in a developing country are Tax Avoidance, Environmental Regulations.
Tax Avoidance: One example is when a multinational corporation (MNC) from a developed country takes advantage of the less stringent tax laws and regulations in a developing country. They may establish subsidiaries or offshore entities in the developing country to shift profits and reduce their tax liability. By exploiting tax loopholes or lower tax rates in the developing country, the MNC can potentially minimize their overall tax burden and increase their profits.
Environmental Regulations: Another example is when an MNC relocates or outsources its production to a developing country with less stringent environmental regulations. By doing so, the MNC can avoid the costs and compliance requirements associated with stricter environmental standards in their home country. This allows them to potentially operate with fewer restrictions, lower production costs, and potentially contribute to environmental degradation in the developing country.
It is important to note that these examples illustrate situations where MNCs may exploit differences in laws and regulations between developed and developing countries. However, it is crucial to promote responsible business practices that prioritize sustainability, ethical behavior, and adherence to global standards to ensure equitable and sustainable development for all parties involved.
Learn more about tax loopholes
https://brainly.com/question/7227568
#SPJ11
In a divorce, to obtain custody, the genetic father has to convince the court of his fitness and ability to care for his child, whereas if the mother decides to keep her child, she need not legally demonstrate her fitness (True or False)
Answer:False
Explanation: In a divorce or child custody case, both parents may be required to demonstrate their fitness to care for their child. Gender is not a determining factor in custody decisions. Courts consider factors such as the parents' ability to provide a stable home environment, their involvement in the child's life, their mental and physical health, and the child's best interests. While mothers historically have been more likely to be awarded custody in the past, that is not always the case today. The court's primary concern is the well-being and safety of the child, and custody decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
A person who suddenly stops drinking alcohol after having kept a significant amount in his or her body for years may __________.
A. continue to feel impaired
B. need to start eating more
C. have significantly more energy
D. die
Answer: They will (A) continue to feel impaired.
Using your community’s online resources, describe the different steps in assisting children with special needs. Also, list the community’s resources for families of children with special needs and describe the services they offer.
my community is my Los Angeles CA
Different steps in assisting a child with special needs include such as an optimistic attitude, attention to detail, educating yourself, regular developmental assistance and expert guidance.
There are several factors to take into account when looking for the ideal special needs resources for your family, including but not limited to what you expect from the organization. Children with disabilities have special chances to support their entry into postsecondary education, employment, and full adult engagement in society. By giving teenagers direction while they explore their interests, advice on how to plan their careers and college educations, and support as they pursue their goals, families may help with the transition process. These help might be near the school or in the neighbourhood and open to the family. It includes: i) materials for educators and students with special needs; ii) student transportation; iii) speech therapy; iv) physical and occupational therapy; v) counselling for kids, parents, and educators; and vii) medical care.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/17459074
#SPJ4
Consequences for breaking alcohol selling laws include�
a) The server being found guilty of a crime
b) The server paying for damages caused by a person illegally served alcohol by them
c) The employer losing their license to sell alcohol
d) All of the above