Albert was asked to list four decimals
between 0.25 and 0.50. What are four
decimals Albert may have written? Please help

Audrey should run 30 meters along the shore before jumping into the water to save the child.

Let x be the distance Audrey should run before jumping into the water to save the child.

Find the time it takes Audrey to run to a point perpendicular to the child where she will jump into the water. Taking the perpendicular distance as y, then by Pythagoras' theorem, we have: y² = 40² - 30²y² = 1600 - 900y = √700y = 10√7 m

Audrey runs at 3 meters per second.

Hence, the time it takes her to cover the distance of y meters is:

t₁ = y/3 s

Find the time it takes Audrey to swim the remaining distance from the point she jumps into the water to the child.

The remaining distance is z where: z² = (30 - x)² + y²z² = 900 - 60x + x² + 700z² = x² - 60x + 1600z = √(x² - 60x + 1600 + 700)z = √(x² - 60x + 2300) m

Audrey swims at 1.2 meters per second.

Hence, the time it takes her to swim the distance of z meters is: t₂ = z/1.2 s

The total time it takes Audrey to save the child T = t₁ + t₂

T = y/3 + z/1.2s

Substituting the values for y and z above: T = 10√7/3 + √(x² - 60x + 2300)/1.2 s

Minimizing T

To minimize T, we differentiate T with respect to x and set the derivative equal to zero.

dT/dx = 0 - 20(x - 30)/(3√(x² - 60x + 2300)) = 0-20(x - 30)/(3√(x² - 60x + 2300)) = 0-20(x - 30) = 0x - 30 = 0x = 30 m

Therefore, Audrey should run 30 meters along the shore before jumping into the water to save the child.

To learn about distance here:

https://brainly.com/question/30395212

#SPJ11

The total amount of meals in dollars served by Jerome is equals to $1150.

Total amount Jerome earned this weekend = $252.50.

Jerome earned every weekend = $80.

Jerome earned cost of meals as tips by serving them = 15%

Let us consider the dollar amount of the meals that Jerome served 'x'.

Jerome earned a total of $252.50 for the weekend,

which consists of his earnings from the meals and his flat rate earnings.

Set up an equation to represent this,

x × 0.15 + 80 = 252.50

Simplifying this equation by subtracting 80 from both sides, we get,

⇒ 0.15x = 172.50

⇒ x = 1150

Therefore, the dollar amount of the meals that Jerome served was $1150.

Learn more about meals here

brainly.com/question/29705065

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

The weekend Jerome earned 252. 50 in all. What was the dollar amount of the meals that Jerome served? Jerome served worth meals this weekend. Jerome earns 15%percent off all the costs of meal on all meals and he earns 80 dollars every weekend

The range would be the most appropriate measure of spread in this case because it takes into account the extreme values of $300 and $1,300 and provides a clear measure of the difference between them.

To measure the amount of money college students spend on rent per month, the most appropriate measure of spread would be the range. The range is the simplest measure of spread and is calculated by subtracting the lowest value from the highest value in a data set. In this case, the range would be $1,300 - $300 = $1,000.

The median would not be the best choice in this scenario because it only represents the middle value in a data set. It does not take into account extreme values like the $1,300 rent expense.

Standard deviation would not be the most appropriate measure of spread in this case because it calculates the average deviation of each data point from the mean. However, it may not accurately represent the spread when extreme values like the $1,300 rent expense are present.

The interquartile range (IQR) would not be the best choice either because it measures the spread of the middle 50% of the data set. It does not consider extreme values and would not accurately represent the range of rent expenses in this scenario.

In summary, the range would be the most appropriate measure of spread in this case because it takes into account the extreme values of $300 and $1,300 and provides a clear measure of the difference between them.

Know more about Standard deviation here,

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

Let's calculate the products and check if they indeed have the same value:

Product of 32 and 46:

32 * 46 = 1,472

Reverse the digits of 23 and 64:

23 * 64 = 1,472

As you mentioned, the products are the same. This phenomenon is not unique to this particular pair of numbers. In fact, it occurs with any pair of two-digit numbers whose digits, when reversed, are the same as the product of the original numbers.

To find two other pairs of two-digit numbers that have this property, we can explore a few examples:

Product of 13 and 62:

13 * 62 = 806

Reversed digits: 31 * 26 = 806

Product of 17 and 83:

17 * 83 = 1,411

Reversed digits: 71 * 38 = 1,411

As for determining if a given pair of two-digit numbers will have this property without actually performing the multiplication, there is a simple rule. For any pair of two-digit numbers (AB and CD), if the sum of A and D equals the sum of B and C, then the products of the original and reversed digits will be the same.

For example, let's consider the pair 25 and 79:

A = 2, B = 5, C = 7, D = 9

The sum of A and D is 2 + 9 = 11, and the sum of B and C is 5 + 7 = 12. Since the sums are not equal (11 ≠ 12), we can determine that the products of the original and reversed digits will not be the same for this pair.

Therefore, by checking the sums of the digits in the two-digit numbers, we can determine whether they will have the property of the products being the same when digits are reversed.

After answering the provided question, we can conclude that Therefore, inequality the answer is X = 9.

In mathematics, an inequality is a non-equal relationship between two expressions or values. As a result, imbalance leads to inequality. In to mathematics, an inequality connects two values that are not equal. Inequality is not the same as equality. When two values are not equal, the not equal sign is commonly used (). Different inequalities, no matter how small or large, are used to contrast values. Many simple inequalities can be solved by modifying the 2 sides until only the variables remain. However, a number of factors contribute to inequality: Negative values are divided or added on both sides. Exchange left and right.

the inequality :

\(24 > -9 + 5x\\33 > 5x\\6.6 < x\\\)

So, the solution to the inequality is x > 6.6. Among the answer choices given, the only solution that satisfies this inequality is:

X = 9

Therefore, the answer is X = 9.

To know more about inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29914203

#SPJ1

Answer:

question por favor. ............ ....

Answer:

18/8 = x/3

x = 6.75 inches (length)

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi, to answer this question we have to write 2 ratios using the information given:

A larger rectangle has a length of 18 inches and width of 8 inches.

Inches /width = 18/8

So, for a rectangle that has a length of x inches and width of 3 inches the ratio is :

x/3

Solving for x:

18/8 = x/3

18/8 (3) =x

6.75 in= x

Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.

Answer:

y= -2/5x -2

Step-by-step explanation:

y = mx + b

jxjxjxjxnxjddjdjdjdjj

Answer: To find the magnitude and direction of vector RS, we first need to find the components of the vector, which are given by the differences in the x- and y-coordinates of R and S:

v = RS = <(-14) - (-2), 8 - 11> = <-12, -3>

The magnitude of v is given by the formula ||v|| = sqrt(a^2 + b^2), where a and b are the x- and y-components of v:

||v|| = sqrt((-12)^2 + (-3)^2) = sqrt(144 + 9) = sqrt(153) = 12.37

The direction of v is given by the angle that it makes with the positive x-axis, measured counterclockwise. We can find this angle using the formula theta = arctan(b/a), where a and b are the x- and y-components of v:

theta = arctan(-3/-12) = arctan(0.25) = -14.04 degrees (rounded to the nearest hundredth)

Therefore, the magnitude of RS is 12.37, and the direction of RS is 14.04 degrees below the negative x-axis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2,

Step-by-step explanation:

It will be a low value < 7.

It.s in the acid range.t

Answer:

It would be 2!

I took the K-12 Quiz

Answer:

a) 1/25

b) 4/25

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: y= 3/2x - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation is y=mx + b

The y-intercept is when x = 0, so on the table y-intercept = -6

The slope is rise/run, we see that y increase by three and x increase by 2, so the slope is 3/2

to get the slope of any straight line, we simply need two points off of it, let's use those ones in the picture below.

\((\stackrel{x_1}{2}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{-3})\qquad (\stackrel{x_2}{6}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{3}) \\\\\\ \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies \cfrac{\stackrel{rise} {\stackrel{y_2}{3}-\stackrel{y1}{(-3)}}}{\underset{run} {\underset{x_2}{6}-\underset{x_1}{2}}} \implies \cfrac{3 +3}{4} \implies \cfrac{ 6 }{ 4 } \implies {\Large \begin{array}{llll} \cfrac{3 }{ 2 } \end{array}}\)

now, the y-intercept occurs when x = 0, recheck the picture below.

Influential scores, indicated by large residuals, have a significant impact on the regression line when removed from the data. These points, characterized by extreme x or y-values, can alter the slope and intercept of the regression line, emphasizing their importance in regression analysis.

The correct statements about influential scores are i and ii.

i. Influential scores have large residuals because they have a strong effect on the regression line. This means that if we remove an influential score from the data, it will significantly change the slope and intercept of the regression line.

ii. Removal of an influential score sharply affects the regression line because influential scores have a large impact on the regression line. If we remove an influential score, it will significantly change the slope and intercept of the regression line.

iii. This statement is not true. An x-value that is an outlier in the x-variable may be indicative of a point being influential, but a y-value that is an outlier in the y-variable can also be indicative of a point being influential.

Learn more about regression line here:

brainly.com/question/7656407

#SPJ11

Answer:

perpendicular slope = \(\frac{1}{6}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

given

6x + y = 8 ( subtract 6x from both sides )

y = - 6x + 8 ← in slope- intercept form

with slope m = - 6

given a line with slope m then the slope of a line perpendicular to it is

\(m_{perpendicular}\) = - \(\frac{1}{m}\) = - \(\frac{1}{-6}\) = \(\frac{1}{6}\)

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

because (-2)^2 is 4 and -2^2 is -4

Answer:

it would be (5,60)

Step-by-step explanation:

he bought 5 boxes

each box has 12 pencils

5*12=60

Answer:

121.80

Step-by-step explanation:

keeping in mind that parallel lines have exactly the same slope, let's check for the slope of the equation above

\(x-3y=9\implies -3y=-x+9\implies y=\cfrac{-x+9}{-3} \\\\\\ y=\cfrac{-x}{-3}+\cfrac{9}{-3}\implies y=\cfrac{1}{3}x-3\qquad \impliedby \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} slope-intercept~form\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y=\underset{y-intercept}{\stackrel{slope\qquad }{\stackrel{\downarrow }{m}x+\underset{\uparrow }{b}}} \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\)

so we're really looking for the equation of a likne whose slope is 1/3 and it passes through (-10 , 9)

\((\stackrel{x_1}{-10}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{9})\hspace{10em} \stackrel{slope}{m} ~=~ \cfrac{1}{3} \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{9}=\stackrel{m}{ \cfrac{1}{3}}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{(-10)}) \implies y -9= \cfrac{1}{3} (x +10) \\\\\\ y-9=\cfrac{1}{3}x+\cfrac{10}{3}\implies y=\cfrac{1}{3}x+\cfrac{10}{3}+9\implies {\Large \begin{array}{llll} y=\cfrac{1}{3}x+\cfrac{37}{3} \end{array}}\)

They both have slope that are neither parallel nor perpendicular. Hence, the answer is (a) neither.

Given below are the pair of equations and we need to tell whether the lines for each pair of equations are parallel, perpendicular, or neither:

y= -1/2x-11 ...(1)

16x-8y=-8 ...(2)

We can convert both the equations into slope-intercept form i.e. y = mx + b. Then, we can compare the slope of both equations and determine their relationship.

(1) can be written as y = -1/2 x - 11

Comparing it with y = mx + b, we can say that the slope m = -1/2(2) can be written as:

16x - 8y = -8

=> 16x + 8 = 8y

=> y = 2x + 1

Comparing it with y = mx + b, we can say that the slope m = 2

Now, we can compare the slope of both the equations:

(1) has slope = -1/2 and

(2) has slope = 2

To determine the relationship between the two lines we will use the following criteria: If two lines have the same slope, they are parallel. If two lines have slopes that are negative reciprocals of each other, they are perpendicular. In all other cases, the lines are neither parallel nor perpendicular. The slope of (1) is -1/2 and slope of (2) is 2.

To learn more about slope, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29184253

#SPJ11

To maximize the number of people that can be fed, subject to the constraint that the total cost of rice and beans cannot exceed $2,000,000. Let's first rewrite the cost constraint as an equation:

38.5x + 35y = 2,000,000

Now we can rewrite the expression for P in terms of one variable.

How optimal allocation for famine relief funds?

To find the maximum number of people that can be fed, which means we need to maximize the function P= 1.1x +y - 108 subject to the budget constraint:

38.5x + 35y = 2,000,000

First, we can rewrite the budget constraint as:

77x + 70y = 4,000,000y - 108.

To do this, we can use the constraints provided by the budget and the prices of rice and beans. Let's assume that the organization will spend all of the $2,000,000, so we have the equation:

38.5x + 35y = 2,000,000

This represents all the possible combinations of sacks of rice and beans that can be bought with the given budget.

To make the problem easier to work with, we can solve for y in terms of x:

y = (2,000,000 - 38.5x) / 35

Now we can substitute this expression for y into the function for P:

P = 1.1x + (2,000,000 - 38.5x) / 35 - 108

Simplifying this, we get:

P = (14x - 3250) / 35

To maximize P, we can take the derivative and set it equal to zero:

dP/dx = 14/35 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = 100,000/14

x = 7,142.857

Since we can't buy a fraction of a sack, we round down to the nearest whole number:

x = 7,142

Now we can use the equation we derived earlier to find the corresponding value of y:

y = (2,000,000 - 38.5 x) / 35

y = (2,000,000 - 38.5(7,142)) / 35

y = 22,000

Therefore, the maximum number of people that can be fed is:

P = 1.1 x + y - 108

P = 1.1(7,142) + 22,000 - 108

P = 30,346

So, the organization should buy 7,142 sacks of rice and 22,000 sacks of beans to feed the maximum number of people.

Learn more about constraint

brainly.com/question/13643976

#SPJ11

Answer: first of all, please write out the problem.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 5.25

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract 7/10 from both sides of the equation

-8/9x +7/10 - 7/10 = -119/30-7/10

-8/9x = -119-21/30

-8/9x = -140/30

the negative signs cancels out and the right hand side reduced to the lowest tern

8/9x = 14/3

multiply both sides by the reciprocal of 8/9 which is 9/8

9/8 * 8/9x = 14/3 * 9/8

x = 21/4

x = 5.25

Answer:

the best eatimated answer would be 150 miles.

24% of 603 = 144.72

so you can round it to 150

Answer:

24% of 603 is 144.72, so the best estimate would probably be 150 miles.

The length of each square Kumar cuts is 10cm and 13cm, and altogether he cuts 130 squares.

Given that,

Length of paper = 65 cm

Breadth of paper = 50 cm

The length of each square,

The greatest common factor of 65 and 50 is 5.

So,

50/5 = 10

65/5 = 13

Therefore the length of each square is 10cm and 13cm.

To find the number of squares cut altogether ,

10 x 13 = 130 squares.

Therefore altogether Kumar cuts 130 squares.

To learn more about length of square refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/28353618

#SPJ1

y = 2x - 4

y = 4x - 6

y = 3x - 4

that's what i got

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 1 1/99 miles per hour

Answer:

53

Step-by-step explanation:

72 = x + 3x - 4

72 = 4x - 4

72 + 4 = 4x - 4 + 4

76 = 4x

76/4 = 4x/4

x = 19

3(19) - 4 = 53

Hope this helps!

Answer:

$25,600

Step-by-step explanation: