100 points!!!!! What do you think America would be like today if the Pilgrims on the Mayflower didn’t sail off course to Plymouth Rock and instead had sailed to Virginia like they had originally planned?

The Peace of Westphalia, which was signed in 1648, had a number of significant consequences. Some are:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

They all gathered syrup.

The diet of North American tribes similar because they all gathered syrup. They all gather sap from maple trees to make syrup. Therefore, option (1) is correct.

The term tribe generally refers to a group of people who share a common ancestry, language, culture, and social structure. Historically, tribes were often composed of families or clans that were organized around a system of chiefs, elders, or other leaders.

They typically lived in a specific geographical area and engaged in activities such as hunting, fishing, farming, or herding. Tribes have been found in various parts of the world, including Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania.

The all North American tribes gathered syrup so the diet of North American tribes were similar. Thus option (1) is correct.

Learn more about tribes here:

https://brainly.com/question/19552114

#SPJ3

ore Answer:Here’s a quick glance at several fees you’ll often see with credit cards: Interest fees: Usually charged when you carry all or part of your statement balance past the minimum payment due date. Annual fees: Charged yearly for the privilege of using a card. well i named 2 but theres more

Explanation:

The U.S. saw value in providing economic aid to Russia and the other new nations that formed after the fall of the Soviet Union for several reasons: Promoting stability and democracy, preventing economic collapse, Fostering positive diplomatic relations and Mitigating security concerns.

Promoting stability and democracy: The United States viewed the economic aid as a means to support the transition of these newly independent nations towards stable democracies. By assisting in their economic development, the U.S. aimed to prevent social and political upheaval, which could have potentially led to conflicts or the rise of authoritarian regimes.

Preventing economic collapse: The dissolution of the Soviet Union resulted in significant economic challenges for the newly independent states. These countries experienced severe economic downturns, hyperinflation, and the loss of established trade networks. By providing economic aid, the U.S. aimed to prevent complete economic collapse and help stabilize their economies.

Fostering positive diplomatic relations: The provision of economic aid served as a means to establish and strengthen diplomatic ties with the newly independent nations. By extending a helping hand during a period of significant transition, the U.S. sought to cultivate positive relationships and build trust with these countries.

Mitigating security concerns: The U.S. recognized that economic instability in the region could have broader security implications. By assisting in the economic recovery of these countries, the U.S. aimed to prevent the spread of organized crime, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or the emergence of extremist ideologies that could pose a threat to global security.

For such more question on economic:

https://brainly.com/question/15458963

#SPJ8

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

in his Fireside Chat after the attack on pearl harbor, FDR increase American's confidence in the ability of the United States to win the war against the axis powers by explaining how the United State military has become stronger since  World War II first began, to show the confidence in U.S  Army forces.

Two days after Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese, President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered his Fireside Chat to the Americans to get the nation ready for the battle that was to come and with the main message of the speech was to gather the necessary support of the citizens and wanted his audience to extract hope from his speech, despite the difficulties of the presence situation.

He explains how the U.S. military has become stronger since, World War II first began is the correct answer. This can be explained as follows

Therefore, it can be concluded that option B is the correct answer from the given options for the question.

Learn more about FDR increase  Americans' confidence in the ability of the United States to win the war  against the Axis powers here:

https://brainly.com/question/1854022

Answer:

Early Hunters

Explanation:

Answer: He suggest that the government shouldn't be involved. due to his belief of limited government

Explanation:

Answer: A. Require every former Confederate voter to pledge allegiance to the Union

Explanation:

Radical Republicans sought to ensure the loyalty of the South to the Union and to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans. They did not necessarily want to imprison all Confederate soldiers (option B) or ban all former Confederate leaders from holding political office for life (option C), although they did want to restrict the political power of former Confederates. They were indeed supportive of expanding the Freedmen's Bureau (option D), an agency that provided assistance to freed slaves, but this was not at the expense of the Confederate states. Rather, it was intended to help integrate freed slaves into society.

Answer:

Visual sources be used within the discussion to reinforce and explain the written information

Although the asteroid impact that wiped out the non-avian dinosaurs is the most well-known cause of a mass extinction, volcanic activity appears to have wreaked far more havoc on Earth's biota.

At least 4 mass extinctions have been linked to volcanic activity, while only one has been linked to an asteroid. Humans are to blame for factors such as climate change and the introduction of invasive species, which are causing much more extinctions as animal habitats disappear or are disrupted by new species. Extinction events in the past have been caused by extreme changes in temperature, rising or falling sea levels, and catastrophic, one-time events such as a massive huge explosion or an asteroid striking Earth.

Learn more on mass extinction

https://brainly.com/question/14696980

#SPJ4

Answer:

James B. Weaver Thomas E. Watson

Explanation:

Answer:

James B. Weaver and James G. Field were the most successful leader of the populist movement.

Explanation:

Answer:

i only know , 31. which is A.

Answer:

E. USSR

Explanation:

The US talked to the Soviet Union so your answer would be USSR

Answer:

USSR

Explanation:

The other answer is correct, the SALT talks were between Nixon and the USSR

Examples of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics workplaces are Offices,laboratories, outdoor worksites, factories, and historic sites.

A workplace refers to a place (such as a shop or factory) where work is done.

Offices, laboratories, and outdoor worksites are common workplaces.

Factories, classrooms, museums, observatories, and historic sites are the other type of workplaces.

Thus, these are the various types of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics workplaces.

Learn more about Workplace here:

https://brainly.com/question/26463698

#SPJ2

Answer:

A. B. C. E. G.

Explanation:

Edge

Under the direction of an experimenter, people were willing to give another person potentially fatal electric shocks, according to Milgram's obedience study. It emphasises how influential environmental influences are in determining behaviour.

Whereas obedience means doing what you are told, and conformity means caving in to peer pressure or following the crowd, compliance is the act of giving in to an expressed request from another person or group of people.

Stanley Milgram, a social psychologist, studied how respect for authority affected obedience. He came to the conclusion that people, even when acting against their own better judgement and inclinations, obey either out of fear or out of a desire to look cooperative.

To know more about Milgram's obedience visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/4123022

#SPJ1

Answer:

developed in Mesopotamia (Iraq) by 4200–4000 BC.

Explanation:

Answer:

Maryland. This case, decided by the Supreme Court in 1819, asserted national supremacy vis-Ã-vis state action in areas of constitutionally granted authority. Maryland had placed a prohibitive tax on the bank notes of the Second Bank of the United States.

Explanation:

The Clinton presidency impacted the political climate through economic policies and addressing social issues such as healthcare and LGBTQ+ rights.

Firstly, Clinton's economic policies played a crucial role in shaping the nation's fiscal landscape. His administration pursued a combination of fiscal discipline, tax reforms, and deregulation, leading to a period of economic growth, low unemployment rates, and budget surpluses. This fostered a sense of optimism and confidence in the economy, shaping the political discourse and creating a favorable environment for pro-growth policies.

Secondly, the Clinton presidency had a notable influence on social issues. Clinton's administration made efforts to address social challenges such as healthcare reform, education, and LGBTQ+ rights. The push for healthcare reform resulted in the controversial proposal known as "Hillarycare," which ultimately did not pass but sparked national discussions about the role of government in healthcare.

Additionally, Clinton's presidency witnessed advancements in LGBTQ+ rights, including implementing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the military and signing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). These actions sparked debates and shaped the political climate around issues of equality and social progress.

In conclusion, the Clinton presidency significantly impacted the political climate in the United States. Its economic policies fostered growth and influenced discussions on fiscal responsibility, while its efforts to address social issues contributed to national debates on healthcare, LGBTQ+ rights, and the role of government in shaping society. economic policies and their impact on social issues.

For more questions on Clinton

https://brainly.com/question/30053739

#SPJ8

Answer:

Germany became a republic in 1919. After losing the First World War, Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated. Many Germans were dissatisfied with the new situation. They longed for a return to the Empire. Many people also believed that the ruling social democrats were to blame for losing the war. Nevertheless, things started to look up from the mid-1920s onwards.And then in 1930, the global economic crisis hit. Germany could no longer pay the war debts stipulated in the Versailles Peace Treaty. Millions of Germans lost their jobs. The country was in a political crisis as well. Cabinets were falling, and new elections were held all the time. It seemed impossible to form a majority government.

Explanation:

The rise of the NSDAP

The appeal of the Nazis

Hitler appointed Chancellor

National Socialist government: the Nazis share the power

Fire in the Reichstag: a first step towards the dictatorship

Oppression of all opponents

Hitler gains more power

Gleichschaltung of society

Oppression of the Jews

Hitler the autocrat

Contrary to orthodox liberals or neoliberals, supporters of state interventionism, such as heterodox liberals, think that markets may need more government action in economic concerns rather than being likely to produce national prosperity or public well-being on their own.

State intervention is the term for the government's arbitrary actions that interfere with the market economy. Such interference transgresses the social norms that were established when the system of governance was established.

Modern usage of the term "neoliberalism" refers to market-oriented reform initiatives such as "eliminating price restrictions, deregulating capital markets, decreasing trade barriers," and "cutting state power in the economy,", particularly through privatization and austerity measures.

To learn more about neoliberals

https://brainly.com/question/29585564

#SPJ4

Answer:

An oracle, in ancient Greece, was someone who could see the future. But Apollo did not want any old oracle to speak for him. He wanted a real one. But there weren't any real ones, not really. The oracles he had met always had vague answers.

Explanation:

A. Efficiency and speed are valued, is the characteristic of low-context culture

A characteristic of low-context culture is that efficiency and speed are valued. In low-context cultures, the focus is on direct and efficient communication, where information is conveyed in a straightforward and concise manner. People in these cultures prioritize getting things done quickly and effectively.

Efficiency is highly valued because it allows for optimal use of time and resources. Clear and concise communication enables individuals to exchange information rapidly, make decisions promptly, and take swift action. Low-context cultures emphasize productivity and achieving goals within specific timeframes.

Speed is important because it helps streamline processes, reduce delays, and ensure timely responses. In low-context cultures, time is seen as a valuable resource that should be utilized efficiently.

On the other hand, characteristics such as teamwork, excellence and completeness, and the importance of nonverbal elements are more commonly associated with other cultural contexts rather than low-context cultures. While these aspects may still hold value, they are not the primary focus in low-context cultures, where efficiency and speed take precedence in communication and task accomplishment. Therefore, Option A is correct.

The question was incomplete. find the full content below

Which of the following is a characteristic of low-context culture?

A. Efficiency and speed are valued.

B. Teamwork is preferred.

C. Excellence and completeness are valued.

D. Nonverbal elements are important

Know more about low-context culture here:

https://brainly.com/question/30763882

#SPJ8

Answer:

The main Characteristics of a good king is:

Explanation:

Introduction

After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values."

The popular sovereignty in case of 1850, if the New Mexico Territory ever filed to become a state, the federal government gave its residents the right to use popular sovereignty to decide whether slavery would be allowed within the state's boundaries.

Popular sovereignty is a kind of democratic government. The people are the government's source of power, and if it ignores their will, that power is unconstitutional.

The people, who have sovereignty or supreme power, are expected to be served by the government that they freely choose.

A nation's constitution must be approved by a majority of the people or their representatives in order to be considered popularly sovereign. One of the principles upon which the United States was founded is popular sovereignty.

Therefore, the popular sovereignty in case of 1850, if the New Mexico Territory ever filed to become a state, the federal government gave its residents the right to use popular sovereignty to decide whether slavery would be allowed within the state's boundaries.

To know more about the popular sovereignty, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2590759

#SPJ9

Answer:

Henry Cabot Lodge did not ratify the Treaty of versailles for many reasons. Henry Cabot and the senate had felt the need to reject at times,  treaties when its members felt their concerns were not adequately addressed. The Treaty of Versailles was ratified because President Woodrow Wilson had failed to take senators' objections to the agreement into consideration.

Explanation:

We can see that the Treaty of Versailles wasn't actually ratified by Henry Cabot Lodge. This was as a result of many reasons. One of the reasons which can be seen for the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles was because the members of the senate see that their concerns were not adequately addressed.

The ratification of the Treaty was as a result of President Woodrow Wilson's failure to take senators' objections to the agreement into consideration.

The Treaty of Versailles actually refers to the controversial treaty that made Germany and other world powers to receive the blame of World War I. It led to loss of territories, military forces reduction, etc.

We see here that the above summary reveals what happened at the failure of the ratification of the Treaty.

Learn more about The Treaty of Versailles https://brainly.com/question/3604628

#SPJ5

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Spanish explorer Francisco Vázquez Coronado was leading an expedition from México to modern-day Arizona's territory in 1540, trying to find the mysterious cities of Cibola when they found the Grand Canyon and traveled through the Colorado River.

It must have been a wonderful moment of discovery for the Spanish conquerors. To be in front of that majestic sightseeing, speechless, contemplating this nature's wonder never before seen or imagined for them. We could say they were in shock!

Something similar happened to me when I visited the Great City of Teotihuacan, in México. It is an impressive archeological site built by the Teotihucans in central Mexico. The Aztecas found this place abandoned in the 1400s when they were traveling from Aztlán to the Texcoco Lake, where they founded the great city of Tenochtitlan. The capital city of the Aztec Empire.

When I saw the big pyramid of the moon, I was surprised. But when I saw the huge Pyramid of the Sun, I was in shock! It was simply, extraordinary. The architectonic perfection, the symmetry, the proportions, the height. I just wondered how did these people built these magnificent pyramids and temples thousands of years ago, when they did not have the technology we have today.